The use of cues to convergence and accommodation in naïve, uninstructed participants

Vision Research

Volumn 48, Issue 15, 2008, Pages 1613-1624

  Horwood, Anna M ^a   Riddell, Patricia M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accommodation; Naturalistic; Near cues; Photorefraction; Vergence

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BINOCULAR CONVERGENCE; COLOR DISCRIMINATION; EYE DOMINANCE; HAPLOSCOPIC VIDEO REFRACTOR; HUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA IMAGE; SCHOOL CHILD; VIDEORECORDING; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADULT; CONVERGENCE, OCULAR; CUES; HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VISION DISPARITY;

EID: 45549094566     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.04.023     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Alpern M. Accommodation: Evaluation of the theories of presbyopia. In: Davson H. (Ed). The eye Vol. 3 (1962), Academic Press, London 191-229
2. Ansons A., Trimble R., Davis H., and Mein J. Diagnosis and management of ocular motility disorders (2001), Blackwell Science, Oxford
3. Arnott E., and O'Callaghan K. Further investigations of the AC/A ratio. British Orthoptic Journal 28 (1971) 11-22
4. Baker R., Brown B., and Garner L. Time course and variability of dark focus. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 24 (1983) 1528-1531
5. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 8476 (1986) 307-310
6. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 8 (1999) 135-160
7. Breinin G. Accommodative strabismus and the AC/A ratio. American Journal of Ophthalmology 71 (1971) 303
8. Buehren T., and Collins M.J. Accommodation stimulus-response function and retinal imaging quality. Vision Research 46 (2006) 1633-1645
9. Charman W., and Tucker J. Dependence of accommodation response on the spatial frequency spectrum of the observed object. Vision Research 17 (1977) 129-139
10. Ciuffreda K. The Glenn A. Fry Invited Lecture. Accommodation to gratings and more naturalistic stimuli. Optometry & Visual Science 68 (1991) 243-260
11. Ciuffreda K.J., and Hokoda S.C. Effect of instruction and higher level control on the accommodative response spatial frequency profile. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics 5 (1985) 221-223
12. Crone, R. (1973). The control of eye movements. In: Diplopia (p. 89). New York: American Elsevier.
13. Currie D., and Manny R. The development of accommodation. Vision Research 37 (1997) 1525-1533
14. Day M., Strang N.C., Seidel D., Gray L.S., and Mallen E.A. Refractive group differences in accommodation microfluctuations with changing accommodation stimulus. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics 26 (2006) 88-96
15. Eadie A.S., and Carlin P.J. Evolution of control system models of ocular accommodation, vergence and their interaction. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 33 (1995) 517-524
16. Erdurmus M., Yagci R., Karadag R., and Durmus M. A comparison of photorefraction and retinoscopy in children. Journal of AAPOS 11 (2007) 606-611
17. Eskridge J.B. Clinical objective assessment of the accommodative response. Journal of the American Optometric Association 60 (1989) 272-275
18. Field D. Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. Journal of the Optical Society of America 4 (1987) 2379-2394
19. Filipovic T. The accommodative convergence/accommodation (AC/A) and near convergence/distance(NC/D) ratios in esotropia. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus 35 (1998) 91-95
20. Fincham E., and Walton J. The reciprocal actions of accommodation and vergence. Journal of Physiology 137 (1957) 488-508
21. Francis E., Jiang B., Owens D., and Tyrrell R. Accommodation and vergence require effort-to-see. Optometry & Vision Science 80 (2003) 467-473
22. Graham D., and Field D. Statistical regularities of art images and natural scenes: spectra, sparseness and nonlinearities. Spatial Vision 21 (2007) 149-164
23. Griffin J., and Grisham J. Binocular anomalies: Diagnosis and vision therapy (2002), Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston
24. Hainline L., Riddell P., Grose Fifer J., and Abramov I. Development of accommodation and convergence in infancy. Behavioural Brain Research 49 (1992) 33-50
25. Harb E., Thorn F., and Troilo D. Characteristics of accommodative behavior during sustained reading in emmetropes and myopes. Vision Research 46 (2006) 2581-2592
26. Havertape S., Cruz O., and Miyazaki E. Comparison of methods for determining the AC/A ratio in accommodative esotropia. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus 36 (1999) 178-183
27. Horwood A., and Riddell P. The role of near cues in neonatal misalignments. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (2002) 4707 e-abstract
28. Horwood A., Turner J., Houston S., and Riddell P. Variations in accommodation and convergence responses in a minimally controlled photorefractive setting. Optometry & Visual Science 78 (2001) 791-804
29. Horwood A.M., and Riddell P.M. Can misalignments in typical infants be used as a model for infantile esotropia?. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 45 (2004) 714-720
30. Hung G. Linear model of accommodation and vergence can account for discrepancies between AC/A measures using the fixation disparity and phoria methods. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics 11 (1991) 275-278
31. Hung G. Quantitative analysis of the accommodative convergence to accommodation ratio: Linear and static models. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 44 (1997) 306-316
32. Hung G., Ciuffreda K., and Rosenfield M. Static model of proximal accommodation and vergence. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 35 (1994) 1280
33. Hung G., Ciuffreda K., and Rosenfield M. Proximal contributions to a linear static model of accommodation and vergence. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics 16 (1996) 31-41
34. Hung G.K. Adaptation model of accommodation and vergence. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics 12 (1992) 319-326
35. Hunt O.A., Wolffsohn J.S., and Gilmartin B. Evaluation of the measurement of refractive error by the PowerRefractor: a remote, continuous and binocular measurement system of oculomotor function. The British Journal of Ophthalmology 87 (2003) 1504-1508
36. Jiang B.-C. A method for correction of CA/A ratio based on linear model of accommodation and vergence. Optometry and Vision Science 71 (1994) 192-197
37. Judge S. How is binocularity maintained during convergence and divergence?. Eye 10 (1996) 172-176
38. Karania R., and Evans B.J. The Mallett Fixation Disparity Test: Influence of test instructions and relationship with symptoms. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics 26 (2006) 507-522
39. Kenyon R., Ciuffreda K., and Stark L. Dynamic vergence eye movements in strabismus and amblyopia: symmetric vergence. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 19 (1980) 60-74
40. Kenyon R., Ciuffreda K., and Stark L. Dynamic vergence eye movements in strabismus and amblyopia: asymmetric vergence. British Journal of Ophthalmology 65 (1980) 167-176
41. Kotulak J., and Schor C. The effects of optical vergence, contrast, and luminance on the accommodative response to spatially bandpass filtered targets [published erratum appears in Vision Res 1988;27(10):361]. Vision Research 27 (1987) 1797-1806
42. Kruger P.B., and Pola J. Changing target size is a stimulus for accommodation. Journal of the Optical Society of America, Part A 2 (1985) 1832-1835
43. Kushner B. Exotropic deviations: a functional classification and approach to treatment. American Orthoptic Journal 38 (1988) 81-93
44. Kushner B. Diagnosis and treatment of exotropia with a high Accommodation convergence- accommodation ratio. Archives of Ophthalmology 117 (1999) 221-224
45. Leibowitz H.W., and Owens D.A. Anomalous myopias and the intermediate dark focus of accommodation. Science 189 (1975) 646-648
46. Maddox E. Investigations on the relationship between convergence and accommodation of the eyes. Journal of Anatomy 20 (1893) 475-505 565-584
47. McLin L., Schor C., and Kruger P. Changing size (looming) as a stimulus to accommodation and vergence. Vision Research 28 (1988) 883-898
48. McLin Jr. L.N., Schor C.M., and Kruger P.B. Changing size (looming) as a stimulus to accommodation and vergence. Vision Research 28 (1988) 883-898
49. Mein J., and Trimble R. Diagnosis and management of ocular motility disorders (1991), Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford
50. Millodot M. Dictionary of optometry & visual science. (p. 16) (1997), Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
51. Morgan M. Accommodation and vergence. American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry 45 (1968) 417-454
52. North R., Henson D., and Smith T. Influence of proximal, accommodative and disparity stimuli upon the vergence system. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics 13 (1993) 239-243
53. Ogle K., and Martens T. On the accommodative convergence and the proximal convergence. Archives of Ophthalmology 128 (1957) 702-715
54. Okada Y., Ukai K., Wolffsohn J.S., Gilmartin B., Iijima A., and Bando T. Target spatial frequency determines the response to conflicting defocus- and convergence-driven accommodative stimuli. Vision Research 46 (2006) 475-484
55. Owens D.A. The Mandelbaum effect: Evidence for an accommodative bias toward intermediate viewing distances. Journal of the Optical Society of America 69 (1979) 646-652
56. Phillips S., and Stark L. Blur: A sufficient accommodative stimulus. Documenta Ophthalmologica 43 (1977) 65-89
57. Pratt-Johnson J., and Tillson G. Management of strabismus and amblyopia (1994), Thieme, New York
58. Radhakrishnan H., Allen P.M., and Charman W.N. Dynamics of accommodative facility in myopes. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 48 (2007) 4375-4382
59. Rosenfield M., Ciuffreda K., and Chen H. Effect of age on the interaction between the AC/A and CA/C ratios. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics 15 (1995) 451-455
60. Rosenfield M., Ciuffreda K., and Hung G. The linearity of proximally induced accommodation and vergence. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 32 (1991) 2985-2991
61. Rosenfield M., and Ciuffreda K.J. Effect of surround propinquity on the open-loop accommodative response. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 32 (1991) 142-147
62. Schaeffel F., Wilhelm H., and Zrenner E. Inter-individual variability in the dynamics of natural accommodation in humans: relation to age and refractive errors. Journal of Physiology 461 (1993) 301-320
63. Schimitzek T., and Lagreze W.A. Accuracy of a new photo-refractometer in young and adult patients. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 243 (2005) 637-645
64. Schober H., Dehler H., and Kassel R. Accommodation during observations with optical instruments. Journal of the Optical Society of America 60 (1970) 103-107
65. Schor C. Analysis of tonic and accommodative vergence disorders of binocular vision. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics 60 (1983) 1-14
66. Schor C. The Glenn A. Fry Award Lecture: Adaptive regulation of accommodative vergence and vergence accommodation. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics 63 (1986) 587-609
67. Schor C. A dynamic model of cross-coupling between accommodation and convergence-Simulations of step and frequency responses. Optometry and Vision Science 69 (1992) 258-269
68. Schor C. The influence of interactions between accommodation and convergence on the lag of accommodation. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics 19 (1999) 134-150
69. Schor C.M., and Cuiffreda K. Vergence eye movements. Basic and clinical aspects (1985), Butterworth, Woburn, MA
70. Seidemann A., and Schaeffel F. An evaluation of the lag of accommodation using photorefraction. Vision Research 43 (2003) 419-430
71. Semmlow J., and Wetzel P. Dynamic contributions of the components of binocular vergence. Journal of the Optical Society of America 69 (1979) 639-645
72. Stark L. Normal and abnormal vergence. In: Schor C., and Cuiffreda K. (Eds). Vergence eye movements (1983), Butterworth, Woburn, MA 3-14
73. Thompson D. Measurements with cover test versus troposcope. American Orthoptic Journal 2 (1952) 47-52
74. Tondel G., and Candy T. Accommodation and vergence latencies in human infants. Vision Research. 48 (2008) 564-576
75. Tondel G., Wang J., and Candy T. Infants' ability to track ramp accommodative stimuli. Investigative Ophthalmology & Vision Science 43 Suppl. (2002) 2865 (Abstract)
76. Tondel G.M., and Candy T.R. Human infants' accommodation responses to dynamic stimuli. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 48 (2007) 949-956
77. Tsuetaki T.K., and Schor C.M. Clinical method for measuring adaptation of tonic accommodation and vergence accommodation. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics 64 (1987) 437-449
78. Turner J., Horwood A., Houston S., and Riddell P. Development of the response AC/A ratio over the first year of life. Vision Research 42 (2002) 2521-2532
79. von Noorden G. Amblyopia, a multi-disciplinary approach. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 26 (1985) 1704-1716
80. Ward P. The effect of spatial frequency on steady-state accommodation. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics 7 (1987) 211-217
81. Weiss M., Seidemann A., and Schaeffel F. Stimulating human accommodation without changes in focus. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics 24 (2004) 207-217
82. Whitefoot H., and Charman W.N. Dynamic retinoscopy and accommodation. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics 12 (1992) 8-17
83. Wick B. Clinical factors in proximal vergence. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics 62 (1985) 1-18
84. Wick B., and Currie D. Dynamic demonstration of proximal vergence and proximal accommodation. Optometry and Vision Science 68 (1991) 163-167
85. Wolffsohn J.S., Hunt O.A., and Gilmartin B. Continuous measurement of accommodation in human factor applications. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics 22 (2002) 380-384