Enhancing vocabulary development and reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies

Issues in Educational Research

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-11

  Cubukcu, Feryal ^a  

^a DOKUZ EYLUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 45549091007     PISSN: 03137155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Al Melhi, A. M. (2000). Analysis of Saudi college students' reported and actual reading strategies along with their metacognitive awareness as they read in English as a foreign language. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 7, January.
2. Alexander, P.A., & Jetton, T.L. (2000). Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (3, 285-310). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Baird, J. R. (1990). Metacognition, purposeful inquiry and conceptual change. In E. Hegarty-Hazel (Ed.), The student laboratory and the science curriculum. London: Routledge.
4. Bazerman, C. (1985). Physicist reading physics: Schema-laden purposes and purpose-laden schema. Written Communication, 2(1), 3-23.
5. Biggs, J. & Moore, P. (1993). The process of learning. Sydney: Prentice Hall.
6. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R. & Zeidner, M. (Eds) (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
7. Brown, A., & Palincsar, A. (1985). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension strategies: A natural history of one program for enhancing learning. (Technical Report No. 334), Urbana: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
8. Carrell, P. L. (1989). Metacognitive awareness and second language reading. Modern Language Journal, 73, 121-134.
9. Carrell, P. L. (1992). Awareness of text structure: Effects on recall. Language Learning, 42, 1- 20.
10. Carrell, P. L., Gajdusek, L., & Wise, T. (1998). Metacognition and EFL/ESL reading. Instructional Science, 26, 97-112.
11. Chamot, A. U., & O'Malley, J. M. (1994). Language learner and learning strategies. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (371-392). London: Academic.
12. Cohen, E. G. (1986). Designing groupwork. NY: Teachers College Press.
13. Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed?), The Nature of Intelligence, 12, 231-235. NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
15. Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies: L2 Proficiency and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 261-297.
16. Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 178-181.
17. Markstein, L. & Hirasawa, L. (1993). Expanding reading skills. Boston: Heinle Heinle.
18. O'Neil, H., & Abedi, J. (1996). Reliability and validity of a state metacognitive inventory: Potential for alternative assessment (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 469). Los Angeles: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation/National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
19. O'Malley, J.M., & Chamot, A.U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Palincsar, A. (1986). Metacognitive strategy instruction. Exceptional Children, 53(2), 118-124.
21. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds), Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press (451-502).
22. Pintrich, P. R. & Garcia, T. (1994). Self-regulated learning in college students: Knowledge, strategies, and motivation. In P. R. Pintrich, D. R. Brown & C. E. Weinstein (Eds), Student motivation, cognition, and learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum (113-133).
23. Pintrich, P. R., Wolters, C. A., & Baxter, G. P. (2000). Assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning. In G. Schraw & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 43-97). Lincoln NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
24. Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Volume III. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Pressley, M., Brown, R., El-Dinary, P., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). The comprehension instruction that students need: Instruction fostering constructively responsive reading. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 10(4), 215-224.
27. Raymond, M. (1993). The effects of structure strategy training on the recall of expository prose for university students reading French as a second language. Modern Language Journal, 77, 445-458.
28. Song, M. (1998). Teaching reading strategies in an ongoing EFL university reading classroom. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 8, 41-54.
29. Susser, B. & Robb, T. (1990). EFL extensive reading instruction, JALT Journal, 12(2), 161-185.
30. Taraban, R., Kerr, M. & Rynearson, K., (2004). Analytic and pragmatic factors in college students' metacognitive reading strategies. Reading Psychology, 25, 67-81.
31. Veenman, M.V.J. (1993). Intellectual ability and metacognitive skill: Determinants of discovery learning in computerized learning environments. PhD thesis. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
32. Wade, S. E., Trathen, W., & Schraw, G. (1990). An analysis of spontaneous study strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25(2), 147-166.
33. Winne, P. H. & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as Self regulated learning in D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. Graesser (Eds) Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, NJ: Erlbaum.