Identifying the information for the visual perception of relative phase

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 70, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 465-476

  Wilson, Andrew D ^a   Bingham, Geoffrey P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PERIODICITY; VISION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION PERCEPTION; PERIODICITY; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 45549086269     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PP.70.3.465     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. BINGHAM, G. P. (1988). Task-specific devices and the perceptual bottleneck. Human Movement Science, 7, 225-264.
2. BINGHAM, G. P. (2001). A perceptually driven dynamical model of rhythmic limb movement and bimanual coordination. In J. D. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 75-79). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. BINGHAM, G. P. (2004a). Another timing variable composed of state variables: Phase perception and phase driven oscillators. In H. Hecht & G. J. P. Savelsbergh (Eds.), Time-to-contact (Advances in Psychology, Vol. 135, pp. 421-442). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
4. BINGHAM, G. P. (2004b). A perceptually driven dynamical model of bimanual rhythmic movement (and phase perception). Ecological Psychology, 16, 45-53.
5. BINGHAM, G. P., SCHMIDT, R. C., & ZAAL, F. T. J. M. (1999). Visual perception of relative phasing of human limb movements. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 246-258.
6. BINGHAM, G. P., ZAAL, F. T. J. M., SHULL, J. A., & COLLINS, D. (2001). The effect of frequency on visual perception of relative phase and phase variability of two oscillating objects. Experimental Brain Research, 136, 543-552.
7. BOGAERTS, H. [P.], BUEKERS, M. J., ZAAL, F. T. [J. M.], & SWINNEN, S. P. (2003). When visuo-motor incongruence aids motor performance: The effect of perceiving motion structures during transformed visual feedback on bimanual coordination. Behavioural Brain Research, 138, 45-57.
8. BRAUNSTEIN, M. L., HOFFMAN, D. D., & POLLICK, F. E. (1990). Discriminating rigid from nonrigid motion: Minimum points and views. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 205-214.
9. BUEKERS, M. J., BOGAERTS, H. P., SWINNEN, S. P., & HELSEN, W. F. (2000). The synchronization of human arm movements to external events. Neuroscience Letters, 290, 181-184.
10. FONTAINE, R. J., LEE, T. D., & SWINNEN, S. P. (1997). Learning a new bimanual coordination pattern: Reciprocal influences of intrinsic and to-be-learned patterns. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 1-9.
11. GIBSON, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
12. GIBSON, E. J., & PICK, A. D. (2000). An ecological approach to perceptual learning and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. HAKEN, H., KELSO, J. A. S., & BUNZ, H. (1985). A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements. Biological Cybernetics, 51, 347-356.
14. JACOBS, D. M., & MICHAELS, C. F. (2001). Individual differences and the use of nonspecifying variables in learning to perceive distance and size: Comments on McConnell, Muchisky, and Bingham (1998). Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 563-571.
15. JOHANSSON, G. (1950). Configurations in event perception. Uppsala, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell.
16. KELSO, J. A. S., & ZANONE, P. G. (2002). Coordination dynamics of learning and transfer across different effector systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 776-797.
17. MECHSNER, F., KERZEL, D., KNOBLICH, G., & PRINZ, W. (2001). Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination. Nature, 414, 69-73.
18. MECHSNER, F., & KNOBLICH, G. (2004). Do muscles matter for coordinated action? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 30, 490-503.
19. MUCHISKY, M. M., & BINGHAM, G. P. (2002). Trajectory forms as a source of information about events. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 15-31.
20. SCHMIDT, R. C., CARELLO, C., & TURVEY, M. T. (1990). Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 227-247.
21. TEMPRADO, J. J., SWINNEN, S. P., CARSON, R. G.,TOURMENT, A., & LAURENT, M. (2003). Interaction of directional, neuromuscular and egocentric constraints on the stability of preferred bimanual coordination patterns. Human Movement Science, 22, 339-363.
22. WENDEROTH, N., BOCK, O., & KROHN, R. (2002). Learning a new bimanual coordination pattern is influenced by existing attractors. Motor Control, 6, 166-182.
23. WICKELGREN, E. A., & BINGHAM, G. P. (2001). Infant sensitivity to trajectory forms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 942-952.
24. WICKELGREN, E. A., & BINGHAM, G. P. (2004). Perspective distortion of trajectory forms and perceptual constancy in visual event identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 629-641.
25. WICKELGREN, E. A., & BINGHAM, G. P. (2008). Trajectory forms as information for visual event recognition: 3-D perspectives on path shape and speed profile. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 266-278.
26. WILSON, A. D., & BINGHAM, G. P. (2008). Improved perception leads (eventually) to improved movement stability. Manuscript submitted for publication.
27. WILSON, A. D., BINGHAM, G. P., & CRAIG, J. C. (2003). Proprioceptive perception of phase variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 1179-1190.
28. WILSON, A. D., COLLINS, D. R., & BINGHAM, G. P. (2005a). Human movement coordination implicates relative direction as the information for relative phase. Experimental Brain Research, 165, 351-361.
29. WILSON, A. D., COLLINS, D. R., & BINGHAM, G. P. (2005b). Perceptual coupling in rhythmic movement coordination: Stable perception leads to stable action. Experimental Brain Research, 164, 517-528.
30. WIMMERS, R. H., BEEK, P. J., & VAN WIERINGEN, P. C. W. (1992). Phase transitions in rhythmic tracking movements: A case of unilateral coupling. Human Movement Science, 11, 217-226.
31. ZAAL, F. T. J. M., BINGHAM, G. P., & SCHMIDT́, R. C. (2000). Visual perception of mean relative phase and phase variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1209-1220.
32. ZANONE, P. G., & KELSO, J. A. S. (1992a). Evolution of behavioral attractors with learning: Nonequilibrium phase transitions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 403-421.
33. ZANONE, P. G., & KELSO, J. A. S. (1992b). Learning and transfer as dynamical paradigms for behavioral change. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior II (Advances in Psychology, Vol. 87, pp. 563-581). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
34. ZANONE, P. G., & KELSO, J. A. S. (1994). The coordination dynamics of learning: Theoretical structure and experimental agenda. In S. P. Swinnen, H. Heuer, J. Massion, & P. Casaer (Eds.), Interlimb coordination: Neural, dynamical, and cognitive constraints (pp. 461-490). San Diego: Academic Press.
35. ZANONE, P. G., & KELSO, J. A. S. (1997). Coordination dynamics of learning and transfer: Collective and component levels. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 1454-1480.