Trajectory forms as information for visual event recognition: 3-D perspectives on path shape and speed profile

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 266-278

  Wickelgren, Emily A ^a   Bingham, Geoffrey P ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

ACCELERATION; ADULT; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 42949121691     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PP.70.2.266     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. BERTENTHAL, B. I. (1996). Origins and early development of perception, action, and representation. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 431-459.
2. BERTENTHAL, B. I., & PINTO, J. (1993). Complementary processes in the perception and production of human movements. In E. Thelen & L. B. Smith (Eds.), A dynamic systems approach to development: Applications (pp. 209-239). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
3. BERTENTHAL, B. I., & PINTO, J. (1994). Global processing of biological motions. Psychological Science, 5, 221-225.
4. BERTENTHAL, B. I., PROFFITT, D. R., & CUTTING, J. E. (1984). Infant sensitivity to figural coherence in biomechanical motions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 213-230.
5. BERTENTHAL, B. I., PROFFITT, D. R., & KRAMER, S. J. (1987). Perception of biomechanical motions by infants: Implementation of various processing constraints. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 13, 577-585.
6. BINGHAM, G. P. (1987). Kinematic form and scaling: Further investigations on the visual perception of lifted weight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 13, 155-177.
7. BINGHAM, G. P. (1995). Dynamics and the problem of visual event recognition. In R. E Port & T. van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as motion: Dynamics, behavior and cognition (pp. 403-448). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. BINGHAM, G. P. (2004). Another timing variable composed of state variables: Phase perception and phase driven oscillators. In H. Hecht & G. J. P. Savelsbergh (Eds.), Time-to-contact (Advances in PSYCHOLOGY, Vol. 135). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
9. BINGHAM, G. P., ROSENBLUM, L. D., & SCHMIDT, R. C. (1995). Dynamics and the orientation of kinematic forms in visual event recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Perfor-mance, 21, 1473-1493.
10. BINGHAM, G. P., & RUNESON, S. (1983, October). On describing what is perceived: Seeing "velocity " versus seeing "push " in moving objects. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Society for Ecological Psychology, NASHVILLE, TN.
11. BINGHAM, G. P., SCHMIDT, R. C., & ZAAL, F. (1999). Visual perception of the relative phasing of human limb movements. Perception & Psy-chophysics, 61, 246-258.
12. BINGHAM, G. P., ZAAL, F. T. J. M., SHULL, J. A., & COLLINS, D. R. (2001). The effect of frequency on visual perception of relative phase and phase variability. Experimental Brain Research, 136, 543-552.
13. BOOTH, A. E., PINTO, J., & BERTENTHAL, B. I. (2002). Perception of the symmetrical patterning of human gait by infants. Developmental Psychology, 38, 554-563.
14. DAVIS, J. W. (2001, November). Representing and recognizing human motion: From motion templates to movement categories. Paper presented at the Digital Human Modeling Workshop, International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), MAUI, HI.
15. DAVIS, J. [W.], BOBRICK, A., & RICHARDS, W. (2000). Categorical representation and recognition of oscillatory motion patterns. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition, 2, 628-635.
16. DAVIS, J. W., & RICHARDS, W. A. (2000). Relating categories of intentional animal motions (Tech. Rep. No. OSU-CISRC-11/00-TR25). Ohio State University: Department of Computer and Information Science.
17. JOHANSSON, G. (1950). Configurations in event perception. Uppsala, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell.
18. JOKISCH, D., & TROJE, N. F. (2003). Biological motion as a cue for the perception of size. Journal of Vision, 3, 252-264.
19. LACQUANITI, F., TERZUOLO, C., & VIVIANI, P. (1983). The law relating the kinematic and figural aspects of drawing movements. Acta Psychologica, 54, 115-130.
20. MACMILLAN, N. A., & CREELMAN, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. MANN, R., JEPSON, A., & SISKIND, J. M. (1997). The computational perception of scene dynamics. Computer Vision & Image Understanding, 65, 113-128.
22. MCCONNELL, D. S., MUCHISKY, M. M., & BINGHAM, G. P. (1998). The use of time and trajectory forms as visual information about spatial scale in events. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 1175-1187.
23. MUCHISKY, M. M., & BINGHAM, G. P. (2002). Trajectory forms as a source of information about events. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 15-31.
24. PAVLOVA, M., & SOKOLOV, A. (2000). Orientation specificity in biological motion perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 889-899.
25. PITTENGER, J. B. (1985). Estimation of pendulum length from information in motion. Perception, 14, 247-256.
26. PITTENGER, J. B. (1990). Detection of violations of the law of pendulum motion: Observers' sensitivity to the relation between period and length. Ecological Psychology, 2, 55-81.
27. RAO, C., YILMAZ, A., & SHAH, M. (2002). View-invariant representation and recognition of actions. International Journal of Computer Vision, 50, 203-226.
28. RUBIN, J. M., & RICHARDS, W. A. (1985). Boundaries of visual motion (Tech. Rep. No. AIM-835). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.
29. RUNESON, S. (1974). Constant velocity: Not perceived as such. Psychological Research, 37, 3-23.
30. RUNESON, S. (1983). On the visual perception of dynamic events. Uppsala, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis: Studia Psychologica Upsaliensia, 9, 1-56.
31. RUNESON, S., & FRYKHOLM, G. (1981). Visual perception of lifted weight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 733-740.
32. RUNESON, S., & FRYKHOLM, G. (1983). Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person-and-action perception: Expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 585-615.
33. STAPPERS, P. J., & WALLER, P. E. (1993). Using the free fall of objects under gravity for visual depth estimation. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 125-127.
34. SUMI, S. (1984). Upside-down presentation of the Johansson moving light-spot pattern. Perception, 13, 283-286.
35. TWARDY, C. R., & BINGHAM, G. P. (2002). Causation, causal perception and conservation laws. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 956-968.
36. VIVIANI, P., & MCCOLLUM, G. (1983). The relation between linear extent and velocity in drawing movements. Neuroscience, 10, 211-218.
37. VIVIANI, P., & NATALE, S. (1992). Biological movements look uniform: Evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 603-623.
38. WATSON, J. S., BANKS, M. S., VON HAFSTEN, C., & ROYDEN, C. S. (1992). Gravity as a monocular cue for perception of absolute distance and/or absolute size. Perception, 21, 69-76.
39. WICKELGREN, E. A., & BINGHAM, G. P. (2004). Perspective distortion of trajectory forms and perceptual constancy in visual event identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 629-641.
40. WILSON, A. D., COLLINS, D. R., & BINGHAM, G. P. (2005a). Human movement coordination implicates relative direction as the information for relative phase. Experimental Brain Research, 165, 351-361.
41. WILSON, A. D., COLLINS, D. R., & BINGHAM, G. P. (2005b). Perceptual coupling in rhythmic movement coordination: Stable perception leads to stable action. Experimental Brain Research, 164, 517-528.
42. ZAAL, F., BINGHAM, G. P., & SCHMIDT, R. C. (2000). Visual perception of mean relative phase and phase variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1209-1220.