Trajectory forms as a source of information about events

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 15-31

  Muchisky, Michael M ^a   Bingham, Geoffrey P ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; VISION;

HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0036358872     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194554     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. AMEMIYA, T. (1981). Qualitative response models: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 19, 1483-1536.
2. BINGHAM, G. P. (1987). Kinematic form and scaling: Further investigations on the visual perception of lifted weight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 13, 155-177.
3. BINGHAM, G. P. (1995). Dynamics and the problem of visual event recognition. In T. R. Port & T. Van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as motion: Dynamics, behavior and cognition (pp. 403-448). Cambridge, MA: MIT
4. BINGHAM, G. P., ROSENBLUM, L. D., & SCHMIDT, R. C. (1995). Dynamics and the orientation of kinematic forms in visual event recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 1473-1493.
5. BINGHAM, G. P., & RUNESON, S. (1983, October). On describing what is perceived: Seeing "velocity" versus seeing "push" in moving objects. Paper presented at a meeting of the International Society for Ecological Psychology, Trinity College, Hartford, CT.
6. BRAUNSTEIN, M. L. (1976). Depth perception through motion. New York: Academic Press.
7. BRAUNSTEIN, M. L. (1994). Structure from motion. In A. T. Smith & R. J. Snowden (Eds.), Visual detection of motion (pp. 367-393). San Diego: Academic Press.
8. BROWN, R. H. (1961). Visual sensitivity to differences in velocity. Psychological Bulletin, 58, 89-103.
9. DIJKSTRA, T. M. H., SNOEREN, P. R., & GIELEN, C. C. A. M. (1994). Extraction of three-dimensional shape from optic flow: A geometric approach. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 11, 2184-2196.
10. FINNEY, D. J. (1971). Probit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. GOTTSDANKER, R. M. (1956). The ability of human operators to detect acceleration of target motion. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 477-487.
12. GOTTSDANKER, R. M., FRICK, J. W., & LOCKARD, R. B. (1961). Identifying the acceleration of visual targets. British Journal of Psychology, 52, 31-42.
13. HOFFMAN, D., & FLINCHBAUGH, B. (1982). The interpretation of biological motion. Biological Cybernetics, 42, 197-204.
14. JANSSON, G., BERGSTRÖM, S. S., & EPSTEIN, W. (EDS.) (1994). Perceiving events and objects. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. JOHANSSON, G. (1950). Configurations in event perception. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.
16. JOHANSSON, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 201-211.
17. JOHANSSON, G. (1976). Spatio-temporal differentiation and integration in visual motion perception. Psychological Research, 38, 279-293.
18. JOHANSSON, G., VON HOFSTEN, C., & JANSSON, G. (1980). Event perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 27-63.
19. KAY, B. A., SALTZMAN, E. L., & KELSO, J. A. S. (1991). Steady state and perturbed rhythmical movements: A dynamical analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 183-197.
20. KOENDERINK, J. J. (1990). Solid shape. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. KOENDERINK, J. J., & VAN DOORN, A. J. (1992). Second-order optic flow. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 9, 530-538.
22. LAPPIN, J. S. (1995). Visible information about structure from motion. In W. Epstein & S. Rogers (Eds.), Perception of space and motion (pp 165-199). New York: Academic Press.
23. LAPPIN, J. S., BELL, H. H., HARM, O. J., & KOTTAS, B. (1975). On the relation between time and space in the visual discrimination of velocity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 1, 383-394.
24. LITER, J. C., BRAUNSTEIN, M. L., & HOFFMAN, D. D. (1993). Inferring structure from motion in two-view and multiview displays. Perception, 22, 1441-1465.
25. MCKEE, S. P. (1981). A local mechanism for differential velocity detection. Vision Research, 21, 491-500.
26. NAKAYAMA, K. (1981). Differential motion hyperacuity under conditions of common image motion. Vision Research, 21, 1475-1482.
27. NORMAN, J. F., & TODD, J. T. (1993). The perceptual analysis of structure from motion for rotating objects undergoing affine stretching transformations. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 279-291.
28. ORBAN, G. A., DE WOLF, J., & MAES, H. (1984). Factors influencing velocity coding in the human visual system. Vision Research, 24, 33-39.
29. PEROTTI, V. J., TODD, J. T., LAPPIN, J. S., & PHILLIPS, F. (1998). The perception of surface curvature from optical motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 377-388.
30. PEROTTI, V. J., TODD, J. T., & NORMAN, J. F. (1996). The visual perception of rigid motion from constant flow fields. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 666-679.
31. REGAN, D. M., KAUFMAN, L., & LINCOLN, J. (1986). Motion in depth and visual acceleration. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. 1. Sensory processes and perception (pp. 19-1 to 19-46). New York: Wiley.
32. ROSENBAUM, D. A. (1975). Perception and extrapolation of velocity and acceleration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 1, 395-403.
33. ROSENBERG, R. M. (1977). Analytical dynamics of discrete systems. New York: Plenum.
34. RUNESON, S. (1974). Constant velocity - Not perceived as such. Psychological Research, 37, 3-23.
35. SCHMERLER, J. (1976). The visual perception of accelerated motion. Perception, 5, 167-185.
36. THOMPSON, J. M. T., & STEWART, H. B. (1986). Nonlinear dynamics and chaos: Geometrical methods for engineers and scientists. New York: Wiley.
37. TITTLE, J. S., & PEROTTI, V. J. (1997). The perception of shape and curvedness from binocular stereopsis and structure from motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1167-1179.
38. TODD, J. T. (1982). Visual information about rigid and nonrigid motion: A geometric analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 8, 238-251.
39. TODD, J. T. (1983). Perception of gait. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 31-42.
40. TODD, J. T. (1995). The visual perception of three-dimensional structure from motion. In W. Epstein & S. Rogers (Eds.), Perception of space and motion (pp. 201-226). New York: Academic Press.
41. TODD, J. T., & BRESSAN, P. (1990). The perception of 3-dimensional affine structure from minimal apparent motion sequences. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 419-430.
42. TODD, J. T., & NORMAN, J. F. (1991). The visual perception of smoothly curved surfaces from minimal apparent motion sequences. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 509-523.
43. TODD, J. T., TITTLE, J. S., & NORMAN, J. F. (1995). Distortions of three-dimensional space in the perceptual analysis of motion and stereo. Perception, 24, 75-86.
44. VAN DOORN, A. J., & KOENDERINK, J. J. (1983). Detectability of velocity gradients in moving random dot patterns. Vision Research, 23, 799-804.
45. WERKHOVEN, P., SNIPPE, H. P., & TOET, A. (1992). Visual processing of optic acceleration. Vision Research, 32, 2313-2329.