Perspective distortion of trajectory forms and perceptual constancy in visual event identification

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 629-641

  Wickelgren, Emily A ^a   Bingham, Geoffrey P ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4544237548     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194907     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. BINGHAM, G. P. (1987a). Dynamical systems and event perception: A working paper. Pt. I. Perception-Action Workshop Review, 2, 4-14.
2. BINGHAM, G. P. (1987b). Kinematic form and scaling: Further investigations on the visual perception of lifted weight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 13, 155-177.
3. BINGHAM, G. P. (1995). Dynamics and the problem of visual event recognition. In R. F. Port & T. van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition (pp. 403-448). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. BINGHAM, G. P., ROSENBLUM, L. D., & SCHMIDT, R. C. (1995). Dynamics and the orientation of kinematic forms in visual event recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 1473-1493.
5. CUTTING, J. E., & KOZLOWSKI, L. T. (1977). Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 9, 353-356.
6. FRYKUOLM, G. (1983). Action, intention, gender, and identity, perceived from body movement (Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis: Abstracts of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Social Sciences, No. 31).
7. GILDEN, D. L., & PROFFITT, D. R. (1989). Understanding collision dynamics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 372-383.
8. GILDEN, D. L., & PROFFITT, D. R. (1994). Heuristic judgment of mass ratio in two-body collisions. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 708-720.
9. JOHANSSON, G. (1950). Configurations in event perception. Uppsala, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell.
10. JOHANSSON, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 201-211.
11. JOHANSSON, G. (1976). Spatio-temporal differentiation and integration in visual motion perception: An experimental and theoretical analysis of calculus-like functions in visual data processing. Psychological Research, 38, 379-393.
12. JOHNSON, R. A., & WICHERN, D. W. (1998). Applied multivariate statistical analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13. KAY, B. A., KELSO, J. A. S., SALTZMAN, E. L., & SCHÖNER, G. (1987). Space-time behavior of single and bimanual rhythmical movements: Data and limit cycle model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 13, 178-192.
14. MACMILLAN, N. A., & CREELMAN, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. MUCHISKY, M. M., & BINGHAM, G. P. (2002). Trajectory forms as a source of information about events. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 15-31.
16. NEWELL, F. N., ERNST, M. O., TJAN, B. S., & BÜLTHOFF, H. H. (2001). Viewpoint dependence in visual and haptic object recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 37-42.
17. ORRAN, G. A., DE WOLF, J., & MAES, H. (1984). Factors influencing velocity coding in the human visual system. Vision Research, 24, 33-39.
18. PEROTTI, V. J., TODD, J. T., LAPPIN, J. S., & PHILLIPS, F. (1998). The perception of surface curvature from optical motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 377-388.
19. RUNESON, S. (1977). On visual perception of dynamic events. Uppsala, Sweden: University of Uppsala.
20. RUNESON, S. (1983). On visual perception of dynamic events (Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis: Studia Psychologica Upsaliensia, No. 9). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell. (Original work published 1977).
21. RUNESON, S. (1995). Support for the cue-heuristic model is based on suboptimal observer performance: Response to Gilden and Proffitt (1994). Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1262-1273.
22. RUNESON, S., & FRYKHOLM, G. (1993). Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person-and-action perception: Expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 585-615.
23. RUNESON, S., & VEDELER, D. (1993). The indispensability of precollision kinematics in the visual perception of relative mass. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 617-632.
24. SHEPARD, R. N., & METZLER, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
25. TARR, M. J., PEPPER, W., HAYWARD, W. G., & GAUTHIER, I. (1998). Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint dependent. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 275-277.
26. WICKELGREN, E. A., & BINGHAM, G. P. (2001). Infant sensitivity to trajectory forms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 942-952.