Door-in-the-face: Understandings of scholarship for academic instruction librarians

Library Philosophy and Practice

Volumn 2007, Issue JUNE, 2007, Pages

  Shanbhag, Shilpa ^a  

^a The College of New Jersey   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 44949169748     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15220222     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Andresen, L.W. (2000). A useable, trans-disciplinary conception of scholarship. Higher Education Research & Development 19 (2), 137-153.
2. Becher, T. (1994). The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education 19(2), 151-61.
3. Boyer, E.L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities for the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton University.
4. Brew, A. (1999). The value of scholarship. HERDSA Annual International Conference. Melbourne. 1-14, Retrieved February 07, 2007, from http://www.herdsa.org.au/branches/vic/Cornerstones/pdf/Brew.PDF
5. Buehl, M.M., Alexander, P.A. (2001). Beliefs about academic knowledge. Educational Psychology Review. 13(4), 385-418.
6. Cialdini, R.B., Vincent, J.E., Lewis, S.K., Catalan, J., Wheeler, D. & Darby, B.L. (1975). Reciprocal concessions procedure for inducing compliance: The door-in-the-face technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 31, 206-215.
7. Holschuh Simmons, M. (2005). Librarians as disciplinary discourse mediators: Using genre theory to move toward critical information literacy. portal: Libraries and the Academy 5 (3), 297-311.
8. Lea, M.R., Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education 23(2), 157-172.
9. Linder, C., Marshall, D. (2003). Reflection and phenomenography: Towards theoretical and educational development possibilities. Learning and Instruction 13, 271-284.
10. Lombardo, S.V., Miree, C.E. (2003). Caught in the web: the impact of library instruction on business students' perceptions and use of print and online resources. College & Research Libraries. 64(1), 6-22.
11. Marton, F., Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Meola, M. (2004). Chucking the checklist: A contextual approach to teaching undergraduates website evaluation. portal: Libraries and the Academy 4 (3), 331-344.
13. Schroeder, C. (2001). Academic literacies, legitimacy crises, and electronic cultures. The Journal of Literacy and Technology 1(2). February 07, 2007, from http://www.literacyandtechnology.org/v1n2/PDFs/ schroeder.pdf
14. Shanbhag, S. (2006). Alternative models of knowlege production: A step forward in information literacy as a liberal art. Library Philosophy and Practice 8 (1). Retrieved February 07, 2007, from http://www.webpages. uidaho.edu/~mbolin/shanbhag.htm.
15. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review 57(1), 1-22.
16. Trigwell, K., Shale, S. (2004). Student learning and the scholarship of teaching. Studies in Higher Education 29 (4), 155-168.
17. Walton, M., Archer, A. (2004). The web and information literacy: Scaffolding the use of web sources in a project-based curriculum. British Journal of Educational Technology 35 (2), 173-186.
18. Webber, S., Johnston, B. (2000). Conceptions of information literacy: New perspectives and implications. Journal of Information Science 26(6), 381-397.
19. Whitmire, E. (2003). Epistemological beliefs and the information-seeking behavior of undergraduates. Library and Information Science Research 25, 127-142.
20. Whitmire, E. (2004). The relationship between undergraduates' epistemological beliefs, reflective judgement, and their information-seeking behavior. Information Processing and Management. 40, 97-111.