E-xams: Harnessing the power of ICTs to enhance authenticity

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 209-221

  Lam, Wing ^a   Williams, Jeremy B ^a   Chua, Alton Y K ^b  

^a School of Business   (Singapore)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Authentic assessment; Constructivism; ELearning; Examinations

Indexed keywords

EID: 44949122520     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for Quality Learning at University, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals: Handbook I, Cognitive Domain, London: Longman Group.
3. Cole, V. (2006). Hot Coffee is a lesson for MBA students, Retrieved June 1, 2007, from http://www.joystiq.com/2006/03/01/hot-coffee-is-a- lesson-for-mba-students/.
4. Fitzsimmons, J., & Williams, J. B. (2005). Creating authentic learning environments: a strategy for student engagement and deeper learning in introductory statistics. OLT-2005: Beyond Delivery Conference, Retrieved June 1, 2007, from https://olt.qut.edu.au/udf/OLT2005/index.cfm?fa= getFile&rNum=2420394.
5. Hanna, N. R. (2002). Effective use of a range of authentic assessments in a web assisted pharmacology course. Educational Technology & Society, 5(3), 123-137.
6. Herrington, J., & Herrington, A. (1998). Authentic assessment and multimedia: how university students respond to a model of authentic assessment. Higher Education Research and Development, 17(3), 305-322.
7. Herrington, J., & Standen, P. (2000). Moving from an instructivist to a constructivist multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(3), 195-205.
8. Hung, D., Tan, S. C., Cheung, W. S., & Hu, C. (2004). Supporting problem solving with case-stories learning scenario and video-based collaborative learning technology. Educational Technology & Society, 7(2), 120-128.
9. MacKinnon, G. R. (2000). The dilemma of evaluating electronic discussion groups. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(2), 125-131.
10. Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies (2nd Ed.), London and New York: Routledge.
11. Mueller, J. (2005). Authentic Assessment Toolbox, Retrieved June 2, 2007, from http://jonathan.mueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/index.htm.
12. Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. (l995). Problem-based learning: an instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31-38.
13. Svinicki, M. D. (2005). Authentic assessment: testing in reality. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 100, 23-29.
14. Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative Assessment: Designing Assessments to Inform and Improve Student Performance, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15. Wiggins, G. (1990). The case for authentic assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2(2), Retrieved June 2, 2007, from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=2&n=2.
16. th ASCILITE Conference, 721-30, Retrieved June 2, 2007, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/auckland02/ proceedings/papers/189.pdf.
17. st ASCILITE Conference, 934-937, Retrieved June 2, 2007, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/procs/williams.html.
18. Williams, J. B. (2006). The place of the closed book, invigilated final examination in a knowledge economy. Educational Media International, 43(2), 107-119.