Authentic assessment: Testing in reality

New Directions for Teaching and Learning

Volumn 2004, Issue 100, 2004, Pages 23-29

  Svinicki, Marilla D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85015172550     PISSN: 02710633     EISSN: 15360768     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tl.167     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Anderson, R. S. and Speck, B. W. (eds.). Changing the Way We Grade Student Performance: Classroom Assessment and the New Learning Paradigm. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no. 74. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1998.
2. Barr, R and Tagg, J. “From Teaching to Learning: A New Paradigm for Undergraduate Education.” Change, 1995, 27(6), 12-25.
3. Cleveland, L. “Cleveland's Good for Business.” University of Texas at Austin Web site: http://www.utexas.edu/features/archive/2004/cleveland.html. Accessed November 14, 2004.
4. Newmann, F Secada, W and Wehlage, G. A Guide to Authentic Instruction and Assessment: Vision, Standards, and Scoring. Madison, Wis.: Wisconsin Center for Education Research, 1995.
5. Palomba, C and Banta, T. Assessment Essentials: Planning, Implementing, and Improving Assessment in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1999.
6. Snavely, L. L and Wright, C. A. “Research Portfolio Use in Undergraduate Honors Education: Assessment Tool and Model for Future Work.” Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2003, 29(5), 298-303.
7. Walvoord, B and Anderson, V. Effective Grading: A Tool for Learning and Assessment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1998.
8. Wellington, P Thomas, I Powell, I and Clarke, B. “Authentic Assessment Applied to Engineering and Business Undergraduate Consulting Teams.” International Journal of Engineering Education, 2002, 18(2), 168-179.
9. Wiggins, G. Educative Assessment: Designing Assessments to Inform and Improve Student Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1998.