Supporting problem solving with case-stories learning scenario and video-based collaborative learning technology

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 120-128

  Hung, David ^a   Tan, Seng Chee ^a   Cheung, Wing Sum ^a   Hu, Chun ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Case stories; CSCL; Problem solving; Social cultural psychology

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042595681     PISSN: 14364522     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bransford, J. D., & Vye, N. J. (1989). Cognitive research and its implications for instruction. In L. B. Resnick & L. E. Klopfer (Eds.), Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research (pp 173-205), Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
2. Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R. S., Hesselbring, T. S., Kinzer, C. K., & Williams, S. M. (1990). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multi-media: Exploration ideas in high technology (pp 115-141), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Brown, D. E. (1992). Using examples and analogies to remediate misconceptions in physics: Factors influencing conceptual change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29 (1), 17-34.
4. Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
5. Burke, K. (1969). A grammar of motives, Berkeley: University of California Press.
6. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1990). Anchored Instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19 (6), 2-10.
7. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1992a). Technology and the design of generative learning environments. In T.M. Duffy & D.H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp 77-89), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1992b). Anchored instruction in science and mathematics education: Theoretical basis, developmental projects and initial research findings. In R. Duschl & R. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology and educational theory and practice (pp 224-273), New York. SUNY Press.
9. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1993). The Jasper experiment: An exploration of issues in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology: Research & Development, 40 (1), 65-80.
10. Deng, Z. Y. (2001). The distinction between key ideas in teaching school physics and key ideas in the discipline of physics. Science Education, 85, 263-278.
11. Dewey, J. (1990). The school and society and the child and the curriculum, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press (Original published in 1902).
12. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process, Boston: Heath.
13. Duhaney, D. (2000). Technology and the educational process: Transforming classroom activities. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27 (1), 67-72.
14. Ferguson, W., Bareiss, R., Birnbaum, L., & Osgood, R. (1991). ASK Systems: An Approach to the Realization of Story-Based Teachers. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2 (1), 95-134.
15. Hernandez-Serrano, J., & Jonassen, D. (in press). The effects of case libraries on problem solving. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.
16. Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional Design Models for Well-Structured and Ill-Structured Problem-Solving Learning Outcomes. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 45 (1), 656-94.
17. Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environment. In Reigeluth, Charles M. (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, Vol. II (pp 215-239), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. nd ed.) (pp 69-120), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
19. Jonassen, D., & Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999). Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology: Research & Development, 47 (1), 61-79.
20. Kilpatrick, W. (1992). Why Johnny can't tell right from wrong, NY: Simon & Schuster.
21. Kolodner, J. L. (1983). Reconstructive Memory: A Computer Model. Cognitive Science, 7 (4), 281-328.
22. Kolodner, J. L. (1997). Educational Implications of Analogy - A View from Case Based Reasoning, The American Psychologist, 52 (1), 57-66.
23. Lehtinen, E., Hakkarainen, K., Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., & Muukkonen, H. (1999). Computer-supported collaborative learning. A review (The J.H.G.I. Giesbers Reports on Education, Number 10), Nijmegen, The Netherlands: University of Nijmegen, Department of Educational Sciences.
24. Lourdusamy, A., Khine, M.S., & Sipusic, M. (in press). Collaborative learning tool for presenting authentic case studies and its impact on student participation. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 31 (3).
25. Matsumoto, D. (1996). Culture and psychology, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
26. Randall, W. L. (1999). Narrative Intelligence and the Novelty of Our Lives, Journal of Aging Studies, 13 (1), 11-28.
27. Ricoeur, P. (1981/1998). Hermeneutics and the human sciences: Essays on language, action and interpretation (edited, translated & introduced by J. B. Thompson), Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28. Schank, R. C. (1993/1994). Goal-based scenarios: A radical look at education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3 (4), 429-453.
29. Tappan, M. (1998). Moral education in the Zone of Proximal Development. Journal of Moral Education, 27 (2), 141-160.
30. Tulving, E. (1993). What is episodic memory? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 67-70.
31. Vitz, P. (1990). The use of stories in moral development: New psychological reasons for an old educational method. American Psychologist, 45 (6), 709-720.
32. Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind in action, NY: Oxford University Press.