The place of the closed book, invigilated final examination in a knowledge economy;La place de l’examen final surveillé, à livre fermé dans une économie du savoir;Sind beaufsichtigte Abschlussprüfungen und Verbot von Hilfsmitteln noch Zeitgemäss?

Educational Media International

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 107-119

  Williams, Jeremy B ^a  

^a Universitas 21 Global   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 44949179763     PISSN: 09523987     EISSN: 14695790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09523980500237864     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Biggs, J., 1987. Student approaches to learning and studying, Hawthorn, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
2. Biggs, J., 1993. What do inventories of students’ learning process really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83: 3–19.
3. Biggs, J., 1999. Teaching for quality learning at university, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
4. Bloom, B. S., ed. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals: Handbook I, cognitive domain, London: Longman.
5. Chaptal, A., and Pouzard, G., 2004. New exams for new professional styles. Educational Media International, 41(2): 129–133.
6. Entwistle, N. J., and Entwistle, A. C., 1991. Contrasting forms of understanding for degree examination: the student experience and its implications. Higher Education, 22: 205–227.
7. Herrington, J., and Herrington, A., 1998. Authentic assessment and multimedia: how university students respond to a model of authentic assessment. Higher Education Research and Development, 17(3): 305–322.
8. Herrington, J., and Standen, P., 2000. Moving from an instructivist to a constructivist multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(3): 195–205.
9. Hung, D., and Chen, D. T., 2003. A proposed framework for the design of a CMC learning environment: facilitating the emergence of authenticity. Educational Media International, 40(1/2): 7–13.
10. Laurillard, D., 2002. Rethinking university teaching: a conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies, (2nd edn), London: Routledge.
11. Marton, F., and Säljö, R., 1976a. On qualitative differences in learning—1: outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46: 4–11.
12. Marton, F., and Säljö, R., 1976b. On qualitative differences in learning—2: outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46: 115–127.
13. Morgan, C., and O’Reilly, M., 1999. Assessing open and distance learners, London: Kogan Page.
14. Ramsden, P., 1992. Learning to teach in higher education, London: Routledge.
15. Thomas, P., Price, B., Paine, C., and Richards, M., 2002. Remote electronic examinations: student experiences. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5): 537–549.
16. Wiggins, G., 1989. A true test: toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 70(9): 703–713.
17. Wiggins, G., 1998. Educative assessment, San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
18. Williams, J. B., 2002. “ The plagiarism problem: are students entirely to blame? ”. In Proceedings of the 19th annual conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE) Edited by: Williamson, A., Gunn, C., Young, A., and Clear, T., 721–730. Available online at: http://www.unitec.ac.nz/ascilite/proceedings/papers/189.pdf (accessed 16 January 2005)
19. Williams, J. B., 2004a. “ The five key benefits of on-line final examinations (with three free bonus benefits) ”. In Educational innovation in economics and business VIII: pedagogy, technology and innovation, Edited by: Ottewill, R., Borredon, E., Falque, L., Macfarlane, B., and Wall, A., 347–358. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
20. Williams, J. B., 2004b. “ Creating authentic assessments: a method for the authoring of open book open web examinations ”. In Beyond the comfort zone: proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE conference Edited by: Atkinson, R., McBeath, C., Jonas-Dwyer, D., and Phillips, R., 934–937. Available online at: http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/procs/pdf/williams.pdf (accessed 16 January 2005)
21. Williams, J. B., 2004c. The authentic assessment web site Available online at: http://www.jeremybwilliams.net/authentic/ (accessed 16 January 2005)
22. Williams, J. B., in press. Assertion-reason multiple-choice testing as a tool for deep learning: a qualitative analysis. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, (forthcoming)