The Outcome Questionnaire 45.2. Italian validation of an instrument for the assessment of psychological treatments;L'Outcome Questionnaire 45.2. Adattamento italiano di uno strumento per la valutazione dei trattamenti psicologici

Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 152-161

  Chiappelli, Marco ^a   Lo Coco, Gianluca ^b   Gullo, Salvatore ^b   Bensi, Luca ^c   Prestano, Claudia ^b  

^a Azienda USL di Bologna   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PALERMO   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Confirmatory factor analysis; Cross cultural validity; OQ 45; Outcome measure

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMMUNITY; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURAL FACTOR; DISTRESS SYNDROME; FEMALE; HUMAN; ITALY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH CARE; MENTAL HEALTH CENTER; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOMETRY; PSYCHOTHERAPY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; THE OUTCOME QUESTTIONNAIRE; UNIVERSITY; VALIDATION STUDY;

EID: 44449175537     PISSN: 1121189X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s1121189x00002852     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Anderson E.M. & Lambert M.J. (2001). A survival analysis of significant change in outpatient psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology 57, 875-888.
2. Bauer S., Lambert M.J. & Nielsen S.L. (2004). Clinical significance methods : a comparison of statistical techniques. Journal of Personality Assessment 82, 60-70.
3. Beck A.T., Steer R.A. & Garbin M.G. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years later. Clinical Psychology Review 8, 77-100.
4. Beckstead D.J., Hatch A.L., Lambert M.J., Eggett D.L., Goates M.K. & Vermeersch D.A. (2003). Clinical significance of the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45.2). Behavior Analyst Today 4, 79-90.
5. Bentler P.M. (2001). EQS 6 Structural Equations Program Manual. Multivariate Software: Encino, CA.
6. Butcher J., Derksen J., Sloore H. & Sirigatti S. (2003). Objective personality assessment of people in diverse cultures: European adaptions of the MMPI-2. Behaviour Research and Therapy 41, 819-840.
7. Chambless D.L. & Hollon S.D. (1998). Defining empirical supported psychological treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 66, 6-18.
8. Chambless D.L. & Ollendick T.H. (2001). Gli interventi psicologici validati empiricamente: controversie e prove empiriche. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane 3, 5-46.
9. Chapman J. E. (2003). Reliability and Validity of the Progress Questionnaire: an Adaptation of the Outcome Questionnaire. Drexel University: Philadelphia, PA.
10. Cipriani A. & Barbui C. (2007). What is an individual patient data meta-analysis? Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 16, 203-204.
11. Conti L. (1999). Repertorio delle Scale di Valutazione in Psichiatria. SEE: Firenze.
12. Davis W.E., Greenblatt R.L. & Pochyly J.M. (1990). Test of MCMI black norms for five scales. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 175-178.
13. de Jong K., Nugter M.A., Polak M.G., Wagenborg J. E.A., Spinhoven P., Heiser W.J. (in press). The Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45) in a Dutch population: a cross-cultural validation. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy.
14. Fava E. & Masserini C. (2006). La valutazione dell'efficacia delle psicoterapie nei servizi pubblici. In La Ricerca in Psicoterapia (a cura di N. Dazzi, V. Lingiardi, A. Colli). Raffaello Cortina: Milano.
15. Freni S. & Papini S.P. (2006). Una rassegna critica degli strumenti utili per la ricerca in psicoterapia. In La Ricerca in Psicoterapia (a cura di N. Dazzi, V. Lingiardi, A. Colli). Raffaello Cortina: Milano.
16. Goldberg D. (2006). The "NICE Guideline" on the treatment of depression. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 15, 11-15.
17. Guthrie E. (2004). Research on delivery of psychotherapy services: an introduction to the special section. Psychotherapy Research 14, 143-145.
18. Hansen N.B., Lambert M.J. & Forman E.M. (2002). The psychotherapy dose-response effect and its implications for tratment delivery services. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 9, 329-243.
19. Hartfield D.R. & Ogles B.M. (2004). The use of outcome measures by psychologists in clinical practice. Professional Psychology-Research and Practice 35(5), 485-491.
20. Jacobson N.S. & Truax P. (1991). Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful clinical change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 59, 12-19.
21. Jöreskog K. & Sörbom D. (1989). LISREL 7: A Guide to the Program and Applications (2nd ed.). SPSS: Chicago.
22. Kline R.B. (1991). Latent variable path analysis in clinical research: A beginner's tour guide. Journal of Clinical Psychology 47, 471-484.
23. Lambert M.J. (2001). Psychotherapy outcome and quality improvement: introduction to the Special Section on patient-focused research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 69, 147-149.
24. Lambert M.J. (2007). Presidential address: what we have learned from a decade of research aimed at improving psychotherapy outcome in routine care. Psychotherapy Research 17, 1-14.
25. th ed.) (ed. M. Lambert), pp. 139-193. Wiley: New York.
26. Lambert M.J., Hansen N.B., Umpress V., Lunnen K., Okiishi J., Burlingame G.M., Heufner J., & Reisinger C. (1996a). Administration and Scoring Manual for the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ 45.2). American Professional Credentialing Services: Wilmington, DE.
27. Lambert M.J., Burlingame G.M., Umphress V., Hansen N.B., Vermeersch D.A., Clouse G.C. & Yanchar S.C. (1996b). The reliability and validity of the Outcome Questionnaire. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy 3, 249-258.
28. Lambert M.J., Hansen N.B. & Finch A.E. (2001). Patient focused research: using patient outcome data to enhance treatment effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 69, 159-172.
29. Lambert M.J., Hannöver W., Nisslmüller K., Richard M. & Kordy H. (2002). Fragebogen zum ergebnis von psychotherapie: Zur reliabilität und Validitat der deutschen ubersetzung des Outcome Questionnaire 45.2 (OQ-45.2). Zeitscrift fur Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie 31, 40-46.
30. Lambert M.J., Morton J.J., Hatfield D.R., Harmon C., Hamilton S., Shimokawa K. et al. (2004). Administration and Scoring Manual for the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ 45.2) (3 ed.). American Professional Credentialling Services LLC: Wilmington, DE.
31. Lo Coco G., Prestano C. & Lambert M.J. (2003). La ricerca focalizzata sul paziente. Un modello di supporto clinico per il terapeuta. Ricerca in Psicoterapia 3, 135-149.
32. Lo Coco G., Prestano C., Di Stefano G., Gullo S. & Lambert M.J. (2006). Un primo studio sulla validazione italiana dell'Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45.2). Ricerca in Psicoterapia 9, 7-19.
33. Lueger R.J., Howard K.J., Martinovich Z., Lutz W., Anderson E.E. & Grissom G. (2001). Assessing treatment progress of individual patients using expected treatment response models. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 69, 150-158.
34. Mueller R., Lambert M.J. & Burlingame G.M. (1998). The Outcome Questionnaire: A confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment 70, 248-262.
35. Pilling S. & Price K. (2006). Developing and implementing clinical guidelines: lessons from the NICE Schizophrenia Guideline. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 15, 109-116.
36. Spielberger C.D., Gorsuch R.L., Lushene R.E., Vagg P.R. & Jacobs G.A. (1983). State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Manual. Consulting Psychologists Press: Palo Alto, CA.
37. Umphress V.J., Lambert M.J., Smart D.W., Barlow S.H. & Clouse G. (1997). Concurrent and construct validity of the Outcome Questionnaire. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 15, 40-55.
38. Vermeersch D., Lambert M.J. & Burlingame G.M. (2000). Outcome Questionnaire: Item sensitivity to change. Journal of Personality Assessment 74, 242-261.
39. World Health Organization (2003). Mental Health Policy and Service Guidance Package - Quality Improvement for Mental Health. World Health Organization: Geneva.