A first study about the Italian adaptation of the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45.2);Un primo studio sulla validazione Italiana dell'Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45.2)

Ricerca in Psicoterapia

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 7-19

  Lo Coco, Gianluca ^a   Prestano, Claudia ^a   Gullo, Salvatore ^a   Di Stefano, Giovanni ^a   Lambert, Michael J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PALERMO   (Italy)

^b BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Confirmative factor analysis; Consruct validity; OQ 45; Outcome measure

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BECK DEPRESSION INVENTORY; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MENTAL HEALTH; MENTAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATE TRAIT ANXIETY INVENTORY;

EID: 44449126110     PISSN: 15928543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. BARLOW D.H. (1996), The effectiveness of psychotherapy: Science and policy, in «Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice», 3, 236-240.
2. BECK A. T., STEER R.A., GARBIN M.G. (1988), Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years later, in «Clinical Psychology Review», 8, 77-100.
3. BECK A.T., WARD C.H., MENDELSON M., MOCK J., ERBAUGH J. (1961), An inventory for measuring depression, in «Archives of General Psychiatry», 4, 561-571.
4. BECK A.T., EPSTEIN N., BROWN G., STEER R.A. (1988), An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties, in «Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology», 56, 893-897.
5. BECKSTEAD D.J., HATCH A.L., LAMBERT M.J., EGGETT D.L., GOATES M.K., VERMEERSCH D.A. (2003), Clinical significance of the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45.2), in «The Behavior Analyst Today», 4: 79-90.
6. CHAMBLESS D.L., HOLLON S.D. (1998), Defining empirically supported therapies, in «Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology», 66, 7-18.
7. FROYD J.E., LAMBERT M.J., FROYD, J.D. (1996), A review of practices of psychotherapy outcome measurement, in Journal of Mental Health», 5, 11-15.
8. th ed.), Wiley, New York, pp. 84-135.
9. HU L., BENTLER P. M. (1999), Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives, in «Structural Equation Modeling», 6, 1-55.
10. JACOBSON N.S., TRUAX P. (1991), Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research, in «Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology», 59, 12-19.
11. JÖRESKOG K., SÖRBOM D. (1996), LISREL 8: User's reference guide, Scientific Software International, Chicago.
12. LAMBERT M.J. (1983), Introduction to assessment of psychotherapy outcome: Historical perspective and current issues, in M.J. LAMBERT, E.R. CHRISTENSEN, S.S. DEJULIO (Eds.), The assessment of psychotherapy outcome, Wiley, New York, pp. 3-32.
13. th ed.), Wiley, New York, pp. 72-113.
14. LAMBERT M.J., HANSEN N.B., UMPHRESS V., LUNNEN K., OKIISHI J., BURLINGAME G., HUEFNER J.C., REISINGER C.W. (1996a), Administration and scoring manual for the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ 45.2), American Professional Credentialing Services, Wilmington, DL.
15. LAMBERT, M. J., BURLINGAME, G. M., UMPHRESS, V. J., HANSEN, N. B., VERMEERSCH, D., CLOUSE, G., & YANCHAR, S. (1996b), The reliability and validity of the Outcome Questionnaire, in «Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy», 3, 106-116.
16. LAMBERT M.J., HANSEN N.B., FINCH A.E. (2001), Client-focused research: Using client outcome data to enhance treatment effects, in «Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology», 69, 159-172.
17. LAMBERT M.J., OGLES B.M. (2004), The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy, in «M.J. LAMBERT, E.R. CHRISTENSEN, S.S. DEJULIO (Eds.), The assessment of psychotherapy outcome, Wiley, New York, pp. 139-193.
18. LO COCO G., PRESTANO C., LAMBERT M.J. (2003), La ricerca focalizzata sul paziente. Un modello di supporto clinico per il terapeuta, in «Ricerca in Psicoterapia», 6 (3), 135-149.
19. MUELLER R., LAMBERT M.J., BURLINGAME G.M. (1998), The Outcome Questionnaire: A confirmatory factor analysis, in «Journal of Personality Assessment», 70, 248-262.
20. SPIELBERGER C.D., GORSUCH R.L., LUSHENE R., VAGG P.R., JACOBS G.A. (1983), Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y), Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
21. VERMEERSCH D.A., LAMBERT M.J., BURLINGAME G.M. (2000), Outcome Questionnaire: Item sensitivity to change, in «Journal of Personality Assessment», 74, 242-261.
22. WESTEN D (2005), Lo statuto empirico delle psicoterapie validate empiricamente: assunti, risultati e pubblicazione delle ricerche, in «Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane», XXXIX, 1, 7-10.