Simultaneous expression of cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization and conditioned place preference in individual rats

Brain Research

Volumn 1213, Issue , 2008, Pages 57-68

  Seymour, Claire M ^a   Wagner, John J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Centre response; Cocaine response; Conditioned place preference; Individual differences; Locomotor sensitization; Novelty

Indexed keywords

COCAINE; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENT; LOCOMOTION; MALE; NONHUMAN; OPEN FIELD BEHAVIOR; PLACE PREFERENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SENSITIZATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; COCAINE; COCAINE-RELATED DISORDERS; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; DOPAMINE UPTAKE INHIBITORS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; TIME FACTORS;

ANIMALIA; RATTUS; RODENTIA;

EID: 44449164833     PISSN: 00068993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.03.054     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Allen R.M., Everett C.V., Nelson A.M., Gulley J.M., and Zahniser N.R. Low and high locomotor responsiveness to cocaine predicts intravenous cocaine conditioned place preference in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 86 (2007) 37-44
2. Antelman S.M. Time-dependent sensitization as the cornerstone for a new approach to pharmacotherapy: drugs as foreign/stressful stimuli. Drug Dev. Res. 14 (1988) 1-30
3. Bardo M.T., and Bevins R.A. Conditioned place preference: what does it add to our preclinical understanding of drug reward?. Psychopharmacology 153 (2000) 31-43
4. Bardo M.T., Rowlett J.K., and Harris M.J. Conditioned place preference using opiate and stimulant drugs: a meta-analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 19 (1995) 39-51
5. Brabant C., Quertemont E., and Tirelli E. Evidence that the relations between novelty-induced activity, locomotor stimulation and place preference induced by cocaine qualitatively depend upon the dose: a multiple regression analysis in inbred C57BL/6J mice. Behav. Brain Res. 158 (2005) 201-210
6. Briegleb S.K., Gulley J.M., Hoover B.R., and Zahniser N.R. Individual difference in cocaine-and amphetamine-induced activation of male Sprague-Dawley rats: contribution of the dopamine transporter. Neuropsychopharmacology 29 (2004) 2168-2179
7. Carey R., and Gui J. A simple reliable method for the positive identification of Pavlovian conditioned cocaine effects in open-field behavior. J. Neurosci. Methods 73 (1997) 1-8
8. Carey R.J., DePalma G., and Damianopoulos E. Response to novelty as a predictor of cocaine sensitization and conditioning in rats: a correlational analysis. Psychopharmacology 168 (2003) 245-252
9. Carey R.J., DePalma G., and Damianopoulos E. Acute and chronic cocaine behavioral effects in novel versus familiar environments: open-field familiarity differentiates cocaine locomotor stimulant effects from cocaine emotional behavioral effects. Behav. Brain Res. 158 (2005) 321-330
10. Clement Y., and Chapouthier G. Biological bases of anxiety. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 22 (1998) 623-633
11. Cunningham C.L., and Nobel D. Conditioned activation induced by ethanol: role in sensitization and conditioned place preference. Pharm. Biochem. Behav. 43 (1992) 307-313
12. Cunningham C.L., Tull L.E., Rindal K.E., and Meyer P.J. Distal and proximal pre-exposure to ethanol in the place conditioning task: tolerance to aversive effect, sensitization to activating effect but no change in rewarding effect. Psychopharmacology 160 (2002) 414-424
13. DeVries A.C., and Pert A. Conditioned increases in anxiogenic-like behavior following exposure to contextual stimuli associated with cocaine are mediated by corticotrophin-releasing factor. Psychopharmacology 137 (1998) 333-340
14. Dietz D., Wang H., and Kabbaj M. Corticosterone fails to produce conditioned place preference or conditioned place aversion in rats. Behav. Brain Res. 181 (2007) 287-291
15. Djano S., and Martin-Iverson M.T. Does locomotor response to novelty in rats predict susceptibility to develop sensitization to cocaine and PHNO?. Behav. Pharmacol. 11 (2000) 455-470
16. Ennaceur A., Michalikova S., and Chazot P.L. Models of anxiety: responses of rats to novelty in an open space and an enclosed space. Behav. Brain Res 171 (2006) 26-49
17. Erb S.M., and Parker L.A. Individual differences in novelty-induced activity do not predict strength of amphetamine-induced place conditioning. Pharm. Biochem. Behav. 48 (1994) 581-586
18. Ferguson S.M., Fasano S., Yang P., Brambilla R., and Robinson T.E. Knockout of ERK1 enhances cocaine-evoked immediate early gene expression and behavioral plasticity. Neuropsychopharmacology 31 (2006) 2660-2668
19. Gong W., Neill D.B., and Justice Jr. J.B. Locomotor response to novelty does not predict cocaine place preference conditioning in rats. Pharm. Biochem. Behav. 53 (1996) 191-196
20. Gosnell B.A. Sucrose intake enhances behavioral sensitization produced by cocaine. Brain Res. 1031 (2005) 194-201
21. Gulley J.M., Hoover B.R., Larson G.A., and Zahniser N.R. Individual differences in cocaine-induced locomotor activity in rats: behavioral characteristics, cocaine pharmacokinetics and the dopamine transporter. Neuropsychopharmacology 28, (2003) 2089-2101
22. Hooks M.S., Jones G.H., Smith A.D., Neill D.B., and Justice Jr. J.B. Individual differences in locomotor activity and sensitization. Pharm Biochem Behav 38 (1991) 467-470
23. Kalinichev M., White D.A., and Holtzman S.G. Individual differences in locomotor reactivity to a novel environment and sensitivity to opioid drugs in the rat I. Expression of morphine-induced locomotor sensitization. Psychopharmacology 177 (2004) 61-67
24. Kosten T.A., and Miserendino M.J.D. Dissociation of novelty- and cocaine-induced conditioned locomotor activity from cocaine place conditioning. Pharm. Biochem. Behav. 60 (1998) 785-791
25. Lett B.T. Repeated exposures intensify rather than diminish the rewarding effects of amphetamine, morphine, and cocaine. Psychopharmacology 98 (1989) 357-362
26. Martin-Iverson M.T., and Reimer A.R. Classically conditioned motor effects do not occur with cocaine in an unbiased conditioned place preference procedure. Behav. Pharmacol. 7 (1996) 303-314
27. Mayfield R.D., Larson G., and Zahniser N.R. Cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization and D1 dopamine receptor function in rat nucleus accumbens and striatum. Brain Res. 573 (1992) 331-335
28. Nadal R., Rotllant D., Márquez C., and Armario A. Perseverance of exploration in novel environments predicts morphine place conditioning in rats. Behav. Brain Res. 165 (2005) 72-79
29. O'Dell L.E., Khroyan T.V., and Neisewander J.L. Dose-dependent characterization of the rewarding stimulant properties of cocaine following intraperitoneal and intravenous administration in rats. Psychopharmacology 123 (1996) 144-153
30. Ogawa M., Miyakawa T., Nakamura K., Kitano J., Furushima K., Kiyonari H., Nakayama R., Nakao K., Moriyoshi K., and Nakanishi S. Altered sensitivities to morphine and cocaine in scaffold protein tamalin knockout mice. PNAS 104 (2007) 14789-14794
31. Olmstead M.C. Animal models of drug addiction: where do we go from here?. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 59 (2006) 625-653
32. Orsini C., Bonito-Oliva A., Conversi D., and Cabib S. Susceptibility to conditioned place preference induced by addictive drugs in mice of the C57BL/6 and DBA/2 in bred strains. Psychopharmacology 181 (2005) 327-336
33. Pelloux Y., Constentin J., and Duterte-Boucher D. Differential effects of novelty exposure on place preference conditioning to amphetamine and its oral consumption. Psychopharmacology 171 (2004) 277-285
34. Pelloux Y., Costentin J., and Duterte-Boucher D. Novelty preference predicts place preference conditioning to morphine and its oral consumption in rats. Pharm. Biochem. Behav. 84 (2006) 43-50
35. Piazza P.V., and Le Moal M.L. Pathophysiological basis of vulnerability to drug abuse: role of an interaction between stress, glucocorticoids, and dopaminergic neurons. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 36 (1996) 359-378
36. Piazza P.V., Demininere J.M., Le Moal M., and Simon H. Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science 245 (1989) 1511-1513
37. Pierce R.C., and Kalivas P.W. A circuitry model of the expression of behavioral sensitization to amphetamine-like psychostimulants. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 25 (1997) 192-216
38. Pierce R.C., Bell K., Duffy P., and Kalivas P.W. Repeated cocaine augments excitatory amino acid transmission in the nucleus accumbens only in rats having developed behavioral sensitization. J. Neurosci. 16 (1996) 1550-1560
39. Quertemont E., Brabant C., and Tirelli E. Response to novelty as a predictor for drug effects: the pitfalls of some correlational studies. Psychopharmacology 173 (2004) 221-224
40. Robinson T.E., and Berridge K.C. The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 18 (1993) 247-291
41. Robinson T.E., and Berridge K.C. Incentive-sensitization and addiction. Addiction 96 (2001) 103-114
42. Robinson T.E., and Berridge K.C. Addiction. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 54 (2003) 25-53
43. Rogerio R., and Takahashi R.N. Anxiogenic properties of cocaine in the rat evaluated with the elevated plus maze. Pharm. Biochem. Behav. 43 (1992) 631-633
44. Sabeti J., Gerhardt G.A., and Zahniser N.R. Acute cocaine differentially alters accumbens and striatal dopamine clearance in low and high cocaine locomotor responders: behavioral and electrochemical recordings in freely moving rats. JPET 302 (2002) 1201-1211
45. Sabeti J., Gerhardt G.A., and Zahniser N.R. Individual differences in cocaine-induced locomotor sensitization in low and high cocaine locomotor-responding rats are associated with differential inhibition of dopamine clearance in nucleus accumbens. JPET 305 (2003) 180-190
46. Sanchez C.J., and Sorg B.A. Conditioned fear stimuli reinstate cocaine-induced conditioned place preference. Brain Res. 908 (2001) 86-92
47. Schechter M.D., and Calcagnetti D.J. Trends in place preference conditioning with a cross-indexed bibliography; 1957-1991. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 17 (1993) 21-41
48. Schechter M.D., and Calcagnetti D.J. Continued trends in the conditioned place preference literature from 1992 to 1996, inclusive, with a cross-indexed bibliography. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 22 (1998) 827-846
49. Schroeder J.A., Hummel M., Simpson A.D., Sheikh R., Soderman A.R., and Uterwald E.M. A role for mu opioid receptors in cocaine-induced activity, sensitization, and reward in the rat. Psychopharmacology 195 (2007) 265-272
50. Segal D.S., and Kuczenski R. Individual differences in responsiveness to single and repeated amphetamine administration: behavioral characteristic and neurochemical correlates. JPET 242 (1987) 917-926
51. Shimosato K., and Ohkuda S. Simultaneous monitoring of conditioned place preference and locomotor sensitization following repeated administration of cocaine and methamphetamine. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 66 (2000) 285-292
52. Shimosato K., and Watanabe S. Concurrent evaluation of locomotor response to novelty and propensity toward cocaine conditioned place preference in mice. J. Neurosci. Methods 128 (2003) 103-110
53. Shippenberg T.S., and Heidbreder C. Sensitization to the conditioned rewarding effects of cocaine: pharmacological and temporal characteristics. JPET 273 (1995) 808-815
54. Shuster L., Yu G., and Bates A. Sensitization to cocaine stimulation in mice. Psychopharmacology 54 (1977) 185-190
55. Simpson G.R., and Riley A.L. Morphine preexposure facilitates morphine place preference and attenuates morphine taste aversion. Pharm. Biochem. Behav. 80 (2005) 471-479
56. Spanagel R., and Heilig M. Addiction and its brain science. Addiction 100 (2005) 1813-1822
57. Thompson A.M., Gosnell B.A., and Wagner J.J. Enhancement of long-term potentiation in the rat hippocampus following cocaine exposure. Neuropharmacology 42 (2002) 1039-1042
58. Tzschentke T.M. Measuring reward with the conditioned place preference paradigm: a comprehensive review of drug effects, recent progress and new issues. Prog. Neurobiol. 56 (1998) 613-672
59. Tzschentke T.M., and Schmidt W.J. Blockade of behavioral sensitization by MK-801: fact or artifact?. Psychopharmacology 151 (2000) 142-151
60. Tzschentke T.M. Measuring reward with the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm: update of the last decade. Addiction Biology 12 (2007) 227-462
61. Valjent E., Corbillé A.-G., Bertram-Gonzalez J., Hervé D., and Girault J.-A. Inhibition of ERK pathway or protein synthesis during reexposure to drugs of abuse erases previously learned place preference. PNAS 103 (2006) 2932-2937
62. Vanderschuren L.J.M.J., and Kalivas P.W. Alterations in dopaminergic and glutamatergic transmission in the induction and expression of behavioral sensitization: a critical review of preclinical studies. Psychopharmacology 151 (2000) 99-120
63. Winger G., Woods J.H., Galuska C.M., and Wade-Galuska T. Behavioral perspectives on the neuroscience of drug addiction. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 84 (2005) 667-681
64. Wolf M.E. The role of excitatory amino acids in behavioral sensitization to psychomotor stimulants. Prog. Neurobiol. 54 (1998) 679-720
65. Wooters T.E., Dwoskin L.P., and Bardo M.T. Age and sex differences in the locomotor effect of repeated methylphenidate in rats classified as high or low novelty responders. Psychopharmacology 188 (2006) 18-27