Selection of thermodynamic models for combinatorial control of multiple transcription factors in early differentiation of embryonic stem cells

BMC Genomics

Volumn 9, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2008, Pages

  Chen, Chieh Chun ^a,b   Zhu, Xin Guang ^c   Zhong, Sheng ^a,b,c  

^a University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

^b University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 4; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR NANOG; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SOX2; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; HIGH MOBILITY GROUP B PROTEIN; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEIN; NANOG PROTEIN, HUMAN; POU5F1 PROTEIN, HUMAN; SOX-2 TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVELOPMENTAL GENETICS; DNA MICROARRAY; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; GENETIC ALGORITHM; GENETIC MODEL; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; STEADY STATE; THERMODYNAMICS; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYTOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN MICROARRAY;

ALGORITHMS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; HMGB PROTEINS; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR-3; PROTEIN ARRAY ANALYSIS; THERMODYNAMICS; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 44449121434     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-S1-S18     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bintu L Transcriptional regulation by the numbers: Applications Curr Opin Genet Dev 2005, 15(2):125-35 10.1016/j.gde.2005.02.006 15797195
2. Bintu L Transcriptional regulation by the numbers: Models Curr Opin Genet Dev 2005, 15(2):116-24 10.1016/j.gde.2005.02.007 15797194
3. Buchler NE Gerland U Hwa T On schemes of combinatorial transcription logic Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100(9):5136-41 404558 12702751 10.1073/pnas.0930314100
4. Ivanova N Dissecting self-renewal in stem cells with RNA interference Nature 2006, 442(7102):533-538 10.1038/nature04915 16767105
5. Evans MJ Kaufman MH Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos Nature 1981, 292(5819):154-6 10.1038/292154a0 7242681
6. Martin GR Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1981, 78(12):7634-8 349323 6950406 10.1073/pnas.78.12.7634
7. Thomson JA Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts Science 1998, 282(5391):1145-7 10.1126/science.282.5391.1145 9804556
8. Pease S Isolation of embryonic stem (ES) cells in media supplemented with recombinant leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) Dev Biol 1990, 141(2):344-52 10.1016/0012-1606(90)90390-5 2120094
9. Abeyta MJ Unique gene expression signatures of independently-derived human embryonic stem cell lines Hum Mol Genet 2004, 13(6):601-8 10.1093/ hmg/ddh068 14749348
10. Bhattacharya B Gene expression in human embryonic stem cell lines: unique molecular signature Blood 2004, 103(8):2956-64 10.1182/ blood-2003-09-3314 15070671
11. Catena R Conserved POU binding DNA sites in the Sox2 upstream enhancer regulate gene expression in embryonic and neural stem cells J Biol Chem 2004, 279(40):41846-57 10.1074/jbc.M405514200 15262984
12. Boyer LA Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells Cell 2005, 122(6):947-56 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.020 16153702
13. Loh YH The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells Nat Genet 2006, 38(4):431-40 10.1038/ ng1760 16518401
14. Golan-Mashiach M Design principle of gene expression used by human stem cells: Implication for pluripotency Faseb J 2005, 19(1):147-9 15498892
15. Skottman H Gene expression signatures of seven individual human embryonic stem cell lines Stem Cells 2005, 23(9):1343-56 10.1634/ stemcells.2004-0341 16081666
16. Bernstein BE A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells Cell 2006, 125(2):315-26 10.1016/ j.cell.2006.02.041 16630819
17. Nishimura DY A spectrum of FOXC1 mutations suggests gene dosage as a mechanism for developmental defects of the anterior chamber of the eye Am J Hum Genet 2001, 68(2):364-72 1235270 11170889 10.1086/318183
18. Sun X Frequent somatic mutations of the transcription factor ATBF1 in human prostate cancer Nat Genet 2005, 37(4):407-12 10.1038/ng1528 15750593
19. Liang S Fuhrman S Somogyi R Reveal, a general reverse engineering algorithm for inference of genetic network architectures Pac Symp Biocomput 1998, 18-29 9697168
20. Tyson JJ Chen K Novak B Network dynamics and cell physiology Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2001, 2(12):908-16 10.1038/35103078 11733770
21. Elowitz MB Stochastic gene expression in a single cell Science 2002, 297(5584):1183-6 10.1126/science.1070919 12183631
22. Rosenfeld N Gene regulation at the single-cell level Science 2005, 307(5717):1962-5 10.1126/science.1106914 15790856
23. Raser JM O'Shea EK Noise in gene expression: Origins, consequences, and control Science 2005, 309(5743):2010-3 1360161 16179466 10.1126/ science.1105891
24. Blake WJ Noise in eukaryotic gene expression Nature 2003, 422(6932):633-7 10.1038/nature01546 12687005
25. Spellman PT Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization Mol Biol Cell 1998, 9(12):3273-97 25624 9843569
26. Banerjee N Zhang MQ Identifying cooperativity among transcription factors controlling the cell cycle in yeast Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31(23):7024-31 290262 14627835 10.1093/nar/gkg894
27. Gardner TS Faith JJ Reverse-engineering transcription control networks Physics of Life Reviews 2005, 2:65-88 10.1016/j.plrev.2005.01.001
28. Schmitt WA Jr Raab RM Stephanopoulos G Elucidation of gene interaction networks through time-lagged correlation analysis of transcriptional data Genome Res 2004, 14(8):1654-63 509275 15289483 10.1101/gr.2439804
29. Smith AG Embryo-derived stem cells: Of mice and men Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2001, 17:435-62 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.17.1.435 11687496
30. Pera MF Reubinoff B Trounson A Human embryonic stem cells J Cell Sci 2000, 113(Pt 1):5-10 10591620
31. Donovan PJ Gearhart J The end of the beginning for pluripotent stem cells Nature 2001, 414(6859):92-7 10.1038/35102154 11689953
32. Loebel DA Lineage choice and differentiation in mouse embryos and embryonic stem cells Dev Biol 2003, 264 (1):1-14 10.1016/ S0012-1606(03)00390-7 14623228
33. Stormo GD DNA binding sites: Representation and discovery Bioinformatics 2000, 16(1):16-23 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.1.16 10812473
34. Segal E Module networks: Identifying regulatory modules and their condition-specific regulators from gene expression data Nat Genet 2003, 34(2):166-76 12740579
35. Iyer V Struhl K Absolute mRNA levels and transcriptional initiation rates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996, 93(11):5208-12 39223 8643554 10.1073/pnas.93.11.5208
36. Lewis J Autoinhibition with transcriptional delay: A simple mechanism for the zebrafish somitogenesis oscillator Curr Biol 2003, 13(16):1398-408 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00534-7 12932323
37. Brandman O Interlinked fast and slow positive feedback loops drive reliable cell decisions Science 2005, 310(5747):496-8 10.1126/ science.1113834 16239477