Flexural and diametral tensile strength of composite resins

Brazilian Oral Research

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 84-89

  Bona, Álvaro Della ^a   Benetti, Paula ^b   Borba, Márcia ^c   Cecchetti, Dileta ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PASSO FUNDO   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PELOTAS   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Composite resins; Physical properties; Tensile strength

Indexed keywords

EID: 44449105580     PISSN: 18068324     EISSN: 18073107     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s1806-83242008000100015     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Atai M, Nekoomanesh M, Hashemi SA, Amani S. Physical and mechanical properties of an experimental dental composite based on a new monomer. Dent Mater. 2004;20(7):663-8.
2. Cohen BI, Volovich Y, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Comparison of the flexural strength of six reinforced restorative materials. Gen Dent. 2001;49(5):484-8.
3. Levartovsky S, Kuyinu E, Georgescu M, Goldstein GR. A comparison of the diametral tensile strength, the flexural strength, and the compressive strength of two new core materials to a silver alloy-reinforced glass ionomer material. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;72(5):481-5.
4. Bonilla ED, Mardirossian G, Caputo AA. Fracture toughness of posterior resin composites. Quintessence Int. 2001; 32(3):206-10.
5. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent. 2004;29(5):481-508.
6. Adabo GL, Santos Cruz CA, Fonseca RG, Vaz LG. The volumetric fraction of inorganic particles and the flexural strength of composites for posterior teeth. J Dent. 2003;31(5):353-9.
7. Sabbagh J, Ryelandt L, Bachérius L, Biebuyck JJ, Vreven J, Lambrethts P et al. Characterization of the inorganic fraction of resin composites. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31(11):1090-101.
8. Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Celis JP, Vanherle G. A classification of dental composites according to their morphological and mechanical characteristics. Dent Mater. 1992,8(5)310-9.
9. Anusavice KJ. Phillips: science of dental materials. 11th ed. St. Louis: W B Saunders; 2003.
10. Xu X, Burgess JO. Compressive strength, fluoride release and recharge of fluoride-releasing materials. Biomater. 2003;24(14):2451-61.
11. Palin WM, Fleming GJ, Burke JF, Marquis PM, Randall RC. The reliability in flexural strength testing of a novel dental composite. J Dent. 2003;31(8):549-57.
12. American National Standard. American Dental Association Specification n. 27 for Resin-based filling materials; 1993.
13. International Organization for Standardization: ISO 4049 Dentistry - Polymer-based filling, restorative and luting materials. 3rd ed; 2000.
14. Della Bona A, Anusavice KJ, DeHoff PH. Weibull analysis and flexural strength of hot-pressed core and veneered ceramic structures. Dent Mater. 2003;19(7):662-9.
15. Weinmann W, Thalacker C, Guggenberger R. Siloranes in dental composites. Dent Mater. 2005;21(1):68-74.
16. Ferracane JL, Ferracane LL, Musanje L. Effect of light activation method on flexural properties of dental composites. Am J Dent. 2003;16(5):318-22.
17. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Influence of UEDMA, BisGMA and TEGDMA on selected mechanical properties of experimental resin composites. Dent Mater. 1998;14(1):51-6.
18. Aguiar FH, Braceiro AT, Ambrosano GM, Lovadino JR. Hardness and diametral tensile strength of a hybrid composite resin polymerized with different modes and immersed in ethanol or distilled water media. Dent Mater. 2005;21(12):1098-103.
19. Geirsson J, Bayne SC, Swift EJ Jr, Thompson JY. Mechanical property characterization of a novel directly-placed ceramic restorative material. Am J Dent. 2004;17(6):417-21.
20. Palin WM, Fleming GJ, Marquis PM. The reliability of standardized flexure strength testing procedures for a light-activated resin-based composite. Dent Mater. 2005; 21(10):911-9.