Mechanical property characterization of a novel directlyplaced ceramic restorative material

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 417-421

  Geirsson, Jónas ^a   Bayne, Stephen C ^a   Swift Jr, Edward J ^a   Thompson, Jeffrey Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM DERIVATIVE; CALCIUM DERIVATIVE; DENTAL ALLOY; DOXADENT; FILTEK Z250; FUJI IX; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN; TOOTH CEMENT; TYTIN; WATER;

ARTICLE; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL SURGERY; HARDNESS; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; TENSILE STRENGTH; TIME;

ALUMINUM COMPOUNDS; CALCIUM COMPOUNDS; CERAMICS; COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HARDNESS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH; TIME FACTORS; WATER;

EID: 14544282906     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Arenholt-Bindslev D. Dental amalgam. Environmental aspects. Adv. Dent Res 1992; 6: 125-130.
2. Stonehouse CA, Newman AP. Mercury vapor release from dental aspirator. Br Dent J 2001; 190: 558-560. (Pubitemid 33755379)
3. Tripl L. Canada-wide standards: A pollution prevention program for dental amalgam waste. J Can Dent Assoc 2001; 67: 270-273.
4. Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY, Hickel R. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resin. Dent Mater 2000; 16:33-40.
5. Lutz F, Krejai I. Amalgam substitutes: A critical analyses. J Esthet Dent 2000; 12: 146-159.
6. Busato AL, Loguercioi AD, Reis A, de Oliveira Carrilho MR. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restoration: 6-year results. Am J Dent 2001; 14: 304-308. (Pubitemid 33673818)
7. Schulze KA, Marshall SJ, Gansky SA, Marshall GW. Color stability and hardness in dental composites after accelerated aging. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 612-619.
8. Meredith N, Setchell DJ. In vitro measurement of cuspal strain and displacement in composite restored teeth. J Dent 1997; 25: 331-337. (Pubitemid 127369255)
9. Choi KK, Ferracane JL, Hilton TJ, Charlton D. Properties of packable dental composites. J Esthet Dent 2000; 12: 216-226.
10. Lim BS, Ferracane JL, Sakaguchi RL, Condon JR. Reduction of polymerization contraction stress for dental composites by two-step-light- activation. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 436-444. (Pubitemid 40072245)
11. Tarumi H, Imazato S, Narimatzu M, Matsuo M, Ebisu S. Estrogenicity of fissure sealants and adhesive resin determined by reporter gene assay. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 1838-1843. (Pubitemid 32489349)
12. Sideridou I, Tserki U, Papanastasiou G. Study of water sorption, solubility and modulus of elastisity of light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomaterials 2003; 24:655-665. (Pubitemid 35346395)
13. Shaini FJ, Fleming GJ, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. A comparison of the mechanical properties of a gallium-based alloy with spherical high-copper amalgam. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 142-148. (Pubitemid 33651189)
14. Yap AU, Teih SH, Hastings GW, Lu CS. Comparative wear ranking of dental restorative materials utilizing different wear simulation modes. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24: 574-580. (Pubitemid 127731962)
15. Mash LK, Miller BH, Nakajima H, Collard SM, Guo IY, Okabe T. Handling characteristics of gallium alloy for dental restoration. J Dent 1993; 21: 350-354.
16. Mjõr IA, Burke FJT, Wilson NHF. The relative cost of different restorations in the UK. Br Dent J 1997; 182: 286-289.
17. Bjertness E, Sonju T. Survival analysis of amalgam restorations in long-term recall patients. Acta Odontol Scand 1990; 48:93-99.
18. Leinfelder KF, Sluder TB, Santos JFF, Wall J. Five-year clinical evaluation of anterior and posterior restorations of composite resin. Oper Dent 1980; 3: 276-281.
19. Lutz F, Phillips RW, Roulet JF, Setcos JC. In vivo and in vitro wear of potential posterior composites. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 914-920.
20. Roulet JF. The problems associated with substituting composite resins for amalgam: A status report on posterior composites. J Dent 1988; 16:101-113.
21. Bayne SC, Taylor DF, Roberson TM, Wilder AD, Sturdevant JR, Heymann HO, Lisk MW. Long term clinical failures in posterior composites. J Dent Res 1989; 68:185 (Abstr 32).
22. Baker DL, Greasley A. Clinical handling characteristics of spherical amalgam. Br Dent J1978; 144: 377.
23. Puttkammer A. Mercury-free amalgam? Zahnaerzl Rundsch 1928; 35: 1450-1454.
24. Blair FM, Witworth JM, McCabe JF. The physical properties of a gallium alloy restorative material. Dent Mater 1995; 11: 277-280.
25. Navarro MFL, Franco EB, Bastos PAM, Teixeira LC, Carvalho RM. Clinical evaluation of gallium alloy as a posterior restorative material. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 315-320. (Pubitemid 126699268)
26. Kaga M, Nakajima H, Sakai T, Oguchi H. Gallium alloy restorations in primary teeth: A 12-month study. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127: 1195-1200. (Pubitemid 126433042)
27. Osborne JW. Direct-placement gallium-based restorative alloy: A 3-year clinical evaluation. Quintessence Int 1999; 30:49-53.
28. Mash LK, Miller BH, Nakajima H, Guo IY, Okabe T. Handling characteristics of a gallium alloy triturated with alcohol. Am J Dent 1997; 10: 199-202. (Pubitemid 127499534)
29. Kraft L, Li J, Hermansson L. Characteristics of the contact zone between tooth structure and a calcium aluminium based filling material. Bulletin from manufacturer, DoxaCerex 2001.
30. Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K, Peutzfeldt A, van Dijken JWV. Hardness and in vitro wear of a novel ceramic restorative cement. Eur J Oral Sci 2002; 110: 175-178.
31. St-Georgs AJ, Swift EJ, Thompson JY, Heymann HO. Irradiance effects on the mechanical properties of universal hybrid and flowable hybrid resin composites. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 406- 413.
32. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc 1998; 129: 567- 577.
33. van Dijken JWV, Sunnegårdh-Grönberg. A 2-year clinical evaluation of novel calcium aluminate filling material in Class II cavities. J Dent Res 2003; 82 (Spec Is B): 2635 (Abstr 2635).
34. Shaini FJ, Fleming GJP, Shortall ACC, Marquis PM. A comparison of the mechanical properties of gallium-based alloy with a spherical high-copper amalgam. Dent Mat 2001; 17: 142-148. (Pubitemid 33651189)
35. 3M-ESPE, Filtek Z250 Technical Profile - Technical Paper, 1998. (Available on webside: www.3m.com).
36. McGrory KR, Fay RM, Katz JL, Powers JM. Compressive and flexural properties of composites. J Dent Res 2002; 81 (Spec Is A): (Abstr 3430).
37. Yin R, Heiss M, Sharp L, Suh BI. Development and physical properties of a new low shrinkage composite. J Dent Res 2002; 81 (Spec Is A): (Abstr 514).
38. GC, Fuji IX GP Fast Technical Information, 2001. (Available on website: www.gcamerica.com).
39. Yap AUJ, Pek YS, Cheang P. Physico-mechanical properties of a fast-set highly viscous GIC restorative. J Oral Rehabil 2003; 30: 1 -8.
40. Kraft L, Loof J, Engqvist H, Ahanfelt NO, Hermansson L. Mechanisms of dimensional changes in calcium aluminate-based materials. J Dent Res 2003; 82 (Spec Is B): 189 (Abstr 189).
41. Myklebost P, Mosseng OE, Gjerdet NR. Roughness of filling materials subjected to simulated gastric juice. J Dent Res 2003; 82 (Spec Is B): 378 (Abstr 378).
42. Anusavice KJ, Hojjatie B. Stress distribution in metal-ceramic crowns with facial porcelain margin. J Dent Res 1987; 66: 1493-1498.
43. Lamon J. Statistical approaches to failure for ceramic reliability assessment. JAm Ceram Soc 1988; 71: 106-112. (Pubitemid 18579681)
44. Ikeda K, Igaki H, Kuroda T. Fracture strength of aluminia ceramics under uniaxial and triaxial stress. Am Ceram Soc Bull 1986; 65: 683-688. (Pubitemid 16519726)