|
Volumn 49, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 484-488
|
Comparison of the flexural strength of six reinforced restorative materials.
a a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS;
CEMENT;
DENTAL ALLOY;
FLEXI FLOW CEMENT;
FLEXI FLOW NATURAL;
FLEXI-FLOW CEMENT;
FLEXI-FLOW NATURAL;
GLASS IONOMER;
MIRACLE MIX;
RESIN;
RESIN CEMENT;
SILVER;
TI CORE COMPOSITE RESIN;
TI-CORE COMPOSITE RESIN;
TITANIUM;
TOOTH CEMENT;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
ARTICLE;
CHEMISTRY;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
DENTAL SURGERY;
ELASTICITY;
HUMAN;
MATERIALS TESTING;
MECHANICAL STRESS;
PLIABILITY;
STATISTICS;
SURFACE PROPERTY;
TENSILE STRENGTH;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
CERMET CEMENTS;
COMPOSITE RESINS;
DENTAL ALLOYS;
DENTAL CEMENTS;
DENTAL MATERIALS;
DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT;
ELASTICITY;
GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS;
HUMANS;
MATERIALS TESTING;
PLIABILITY;
RESIN CEMENTS;
SILVER;
STATISTICS;
STRESS, MECHANICAL;
SURFACE PROPERTIES;
TENSILE STRENGTH;
TITANIUM;
|
EID: 0035468076
PISSN: 03636771
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (3)
|
References (0)
|