Phylogeny of the unispicate taxa in Cyperaceae tribe Cariceae I: Generic relationships and evolutionary scenarios

Systematic Botany

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 528-544

  Starr, Julian R ^a,c   Harris, Stephen A ^a   Simpson, David A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAREX; CYMOPHYLLUS; CYPERACEAE; EMBRYOPHYTA; KOBRESIA; SCHOENOXIPHIUM; UNCINIA; VESICAREX;

EID: 4444255960     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1600/0363644041744455     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. BAILEY, L. H. 1886. A preliminary synopsis of North American carices. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 3: 59-157.
2. BALL, P. W. 1990. Some aspects of the phytogeography of Carex. Canadian Journal of Botany 68: 1462-1472.
3. BALL, P. W., A. A. REZNICEK, and D. A. MURRAY. 2002. Cyperaceae Jussieu. In Flora of North America, North of Mexico, vol. 23, ed. Flora of North America Editorini Committee. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. BLASER, H.W. 1944. Studies in the morphology of the Cyperaceae. II. The prophyll. American Journal of Botany 31: 53-64.
5. BRUHL, J. J. 1995. Sedge genera of the world: relationships and a new classification of the Cyperaceae. Australian Systematic Botany 8: 125-305.
6. CHATER, A. O. 1980. Carex. Pp. 290-323 in Flora Europaea, Vol. 5., eds. T. G. Tutin, V. H. Heywood, N. A. Burges, D. M. Moore, S. M. Waters, and D. A. Webb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. CLARKE, C. B. 1883. On Hemicarex, Benth., and its allies. Journal of the Linnean Society, Botany 20: 374-403.
8. CLARKSON, R. B. 1961. Eraser's sedge, Cymophyllus fraseri (Andrews) Mackenzie. Castenea 26: 129-136.
9. CRINS, W. J. and P. W. BALL. 1988. Sectional limits and phylogenetic considerations in Carex section Ceratocystis (Cyperaceae). Brittonia 40: 38-47.
10. CUNNINGHAM, C. W. 1997. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 733-740.
11. DAI, L. K. and S. Y. LIANG, eds. 2000. Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae: delectis florae Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae. Tomus 12. Angiospermae, Monocotyledoneae, Cyperaceae (2), Caricoideae. Beijing: Science Press.
12. DARWIN, C. R. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection or, the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.
13. DAVIES, E. W. 1956. Cytology, evolution and the origin of the aneuploid series in the genus Carex. Hereditas 42: 349-365.
14. DREJER, S. 1844. Symbolae Caricologicae, ad synonymiam Caricum extricandam stabiliendamque et affinitates naturales eruendas. Hafniae: Academia Scientiarum Danica.
15. EGOROVA, T. V. 1999. The sedges (Carex L.) of Russia and adjacent states (within the limits of the former USSR). St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State Chemical-Pharmaceutical Academy; St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press.
16. FARRIS, J. S., M. KÄLLERSJÖ, A. G. KLUGE, and C. BULT. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
17. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
18. GOETGHEBEUR, P. 1986. Genera Cyperacearum. Een bijdrage tot dekennis van de morfologie, systematiek enfylogenese inn de Cyperaceae-gemra. Doctoral Thesis, Rijksuniversiteit Gent.
19. GRAVEL, G., J. R. STARR, A. BRUNEAU, and A. M. MUASYA. 2003. Gains and losses: the phylogenetic implications of a unique three base pair insertion in the 5.8S gene of the Cyperaceae. Monocots 111: The third international conference on the comparative biology of the monocotyledons (www.monocots3. org). (Abstract)
20. HAINES, R. W and K. A. LYE. 1972. Studies in African Cyperaceae VII: panicle morphology and possible relationships in Sclerieae and Cariceae. Botaniska Notiser 125: 331-343.
21. _ and _. 1983. The sedges and rushes of East Africa. Nairobi: East African Natural History Society.
22. HAMLIN, B. G. 1959. A revision of the genus Uncinia (Cyperaceae- Caricoideae) in NEW Zealand. Dominion Museum Bulletin No. 19. Wellington: Dominion Museum.
23. HILLIS, D. M. and J. J. BULL. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42: 182-192.
24. _ and J. J. WIENS. 2000. Molecules versus morphology in systematics: conflicts, artifacts, and misconceptions. Pp. 1-19 in Phylogenetic analysis of morphological data, ed. J. J. Wiens. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
25. HOLM, T. 1900. Studies in the Cyperaceae XIII. Carex willdenowii and its allies. American Journal of Science 10: 33-47.
26. _. 1903. Studies in the Cyperaceae XX. "Grebes Caricum". American Journal of Science 16: 445-464.
27. HOLMGREN, P. K., N. H. HOLMGREN, and L. C. BARNEIT. 1990. Index Herbariorum, Part I: The Herbaria of the World, 8th ed. New York: New York Botanical Garden.
28. HUELSENBKCK, J. P., D. M. HILLIS, and R. JONES. 1996. Parametric bootstrapping in molecular phylogenetics: applications and performance. Pp. 19-45 in Molecular zoology: advances, strategies, and protocols, eds. J. D. Ferraris and S. R. Palumbi. Chichester: Wiley-Liss.
29. JERMY, A. C., A. O. CHATER, and R. W. DAVID. 1982. Sedges of the British Isles. Handbook No. 1 (2nd ed.). London: Botanical Society of the British Isles.
30. KERN, J. H. 1958. Florae Malesianae precursores XXI: notes on Malaysian and some S. E. Asian Cyperaceae VII. Acta Botanica 7: 786-800.
31. _. 1974. Cyperaceae. Flora Malesiana 7: 435-753.
32. KISHINO, H. and M. HASEGAWA. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. Journal of Molecular Evolution 29: 170-179.
33. _, T. MIYATA, and M. HASEGAWA. 1990. Maximum likelihood inference of protein phylogeny and the origin of chloroplasts. Journal of Molecular Evolution 30: 151-160.
34. KLUGE, A. G. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Systematic Zoology 38: 7-25.
35. KOYAMA, T. 1957. Taxonomic study of Cyperaceae 7: the systematic position of Carex sect. Decorae with a taxonomic treatment of the Japanese species. Botanical Magazine, Tokyo 70: 347-357.
36. _. 1961. Classification of the family Cyperaceae (1). Journal of the Faculty of Science, University of Tokyo, section 3, Botany 8: 37-141.
37. _. 1962. Classification of the family Cyperaceae (2). Journal of the Faculty of Science, University of Tokyo, Section 3, Botany 8: 149-278.
38. KRECZETOVICZ, V. I. 1936. Are the sedges of subgenus Primocarex Kük. primitive? Botanicheskii Zhurnal SSSR 21: 395-425. [in Russian]
39. KÜKENTHAL, G. 1909. Cyperaceae - Caricoideae. Pp. 1-824 in Das Pflanzenreich, IV. 20 (Heft 38), ed. A. Engler. Leipzig: Wilhelm Englemann.
40. _. 1940. Neue Cyperaceen aus dem Malayischen und Papuanischen gebiet I. Bulletin du Jardin Botanique de Buitenzorg III, 16: 300-323.
41. KUKKONKN, I. 1967. Spikelet morphology and anatomy of Uncinia Fers. (Cyperaceae). Kew Bulletin 21: 93-97.
42. _. 1978. Two new species of Schoenoxiphium (Cyperaceae). Botanica Notiser 14: 819-823.
43. _. 1983. The genus Schoenoxiphium (Cyperaceae). A preliminary account. Bothalia 14: 819-823.
44. _ and H. TOIVONEN. 1988. Taxonomy of wetland carices. Aquatic Botany 30: 5-22.
45. LE COHU, M.-C. 1967. Recherches taxinomiques sur les Carex du Massif Armoricain. Botanica Rliedonica, série A, no3, 1-213.
46. LEVYNS, M. R. 1945. A comparative study of the inflorescence in four species of Schoenoxiphium and its significance in relations to Carex and its allies. Journal of South African Botany 11: 79-89.
47. LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species Plantarum, exhibentes plantas rite cognitas, ad genera relatas, cum differentiis specificis, nominibus trivialibus, synonymis selectis, locis natalibus, secundum systema sexuale digestas, Tomus II. Holmiae: Impensis Laurentii Salvii.
48. LOURTEIG, A. 1968. Étude sur Uncinia compacta R. Br. (Cyperaceae). Bulletin du Comité National Français des Recherches Antarctiques - Biologie 23: 25-31.
49. MEERT, M. and P. GOETGHEBEUR. 1979. Comparative floral morphology of Bisboeckelereae and Cariceae (Cyperaceae) on the basis of the anthoid concept. Bulletin de la Société Royale de Botanique de Belgique 112: 128-143.
50. MACKENZIE, K. K. 1935. Cyperaceae - Cariceae. North American Flora 18: 1-478.
51. MADDISON, W. P. and D. R. MADDISON. 2000. MacClade, vers. 4.0. Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
52. METCALFE, C. R. 1971. Anatomy of the monocotyledons. V. Cyperaceae. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
53. MORA OSEJO, L. E. 1966. Las inflorescencias parciales de ultimo orden de Uncinia Pers. y la agrupacion sistematica de las Caricoideae Kükenthal. Caldasia, Botanica 9: 277-293.
54. _. 1982. Consideraciones sobre la morfologia, anatomica y posicion sistemática de Vesicarex Steyermark (Cyperaceae). Acta Biologica Colombiana 1: 31-41.
55. MUASYA, A. M., J. J. BRUI-IL, D. A. SIMPSON, A. CULHAM, and M. W. CHASE. 2000. Suprageneric phylogeny of Cyperaceae: a combined analysis. Pp. 593-601 in Monocots: systematics and evolution, eds. K. L. Wilson and D. A. Morrison. Melbourne: CSIRO.
56. NACZI, R. F. C. 1992. Systematics of Carex section Griseae (Cyperaceae). Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
57. NANNFELDT, J. A. 1977. The species of Anthracoidea (Ustilaginales) on Carex subgen. Vignea with special regard to the Nordic species. Botaniska Notiser 130: 351-375.
58. NELMES, E. 1949. Notes on Cyperaceae: XX. The genus Uncinia in Malaysia. Kew Bulletin 1949: 140-145.
59. _. 1951. The genus Carex in Malaysia. Reinwardtia 1: 221-450.
60. _. 1952. Facts and speculations on phylogeny in the tribe Cariceae of the Cyperaceae. Kew Bulletin 1951: 427-436.
61. NICOLSON, D. H. 1992. Seventy-two proposals for the conservation of types of selected Linnaean generic names, the report of Subcommittee 3C on the lectotypification of Linnaean generic names. Taxon 41: 552-583.
62. NIXON, K. N. and J. M. CARPENTER. 1996. On simultaneous analysis. Cladistics 12: 221-241.
63. NOLTIE, H. J. 1994. Kobresia Willdenow. Pp. 333-352 in Flora of Bhutan (vol. 3, part 1), ed. H. J. Noltie. Edinburgh: Royal Botanic Garden.
64. OHWI, J. 1936. Cyperaceae Japonicae. 1. A synopsis of the Caricoideae of Japan, including the Kuriles, Saghalin, Korea, and Formosa. Memoirs of the College of Science, Kyoto Imperial University, Series B, Biology 11: 229-530.
65. PAX, F. A. 1887. Cariceae. In Engler and Prantl (eds.), Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 11, 2: 121. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.
66. PENNINGTON, R. T. 1996. Molecular and morphological data provide phylogenetic resolution at different hierarchical levels in Andira. Systematic Biology 45: 496-515.
67. POSADA, D. and K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
68. RAYMOND, M. 1959. Carices Indochinenses necnon Siamenses. Mémoires du Jardin Botanique de Montréal 53: 1-125.
69. REZNICEK, A. A. 1990. Evolution in sedges (Carex, Cyperaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 68: 1409-1432.
70. ROALSON, E. H., J. T. COLUMBUS, and E. A. FRIAR. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships in Cariceae (Cyperaceae) based on ITS (nrDNA) and trnT-L-F (cpDNA) region sequences: assessment of subgeneric and sectional relationships in Carex with emphasis on section Acrocystis. Systematic Botany 26: 318-341.
71. RUDALL, P. J. 2000. 'Cryptic' characters in monocotyledons: homology and coding, revisiting old characters in the light of new data and new phylogenies. Pp. 114-123 in Homology and systematics: coding characters for phylogenctic analysis, eds. R. Scotland and R. T. Pennington. London: Taylor & Francis.
72. SAVILE, D. B. O. and J. A. CALDER. 1953. Phylogeny of Carex in the light of parasitism by the smut fungi. Canadian Journal of Botany 31: 164-174.
73. SCHWEINITZ, L. D. DE. 1825. Monograph of the North American species of the genus Carex (J. Torrey ed.). Annals of the Lyceum of Natural History of New York 1: 283-373.
74. SHIMODAIRA, H. and M. HASEGAWA. 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 1114-1116.
75. SIMMONS, M. P. and H. OCHOTERENA. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Systematic Biology 49: 369-381.
76. SMITH, D. L. 1966. Development of the inflorescence in Carex. Annals of Botany 30 475-486.
77. _. 1967. The experimental control of inflorescence development in Carex. Annals of Botany 31: 19-30.
78. _ and J. S. FAULKNER. 1976. The inflorescence of Carex and related genera. Botanical Review 42: 53-81.
79. STANDLEY, L. A. 1987. Anatomical and chromosomal studies of Carex section Phacocystis in eastern North America. Botanical Gazette 148: 507-518.
80. STARR, J. R., R. J. BAYER, and B. A. FORD. 1999. The phylogenetic position of Carex section Phyllostachys and its implications for phylogeny and subgeneric circumscription in Carex (Cyperaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 563-577.
81. _, S. A. HARRIS, and D. A. SIMPSON. 2003. Potential of the 5′ and 3′ ends of the intergenic spacer (IGS) of rDNA in the Cyperaceae: new sequences for lower-level phylogenies in sedges with an example from Uncinia Pers. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164: 213-227.
82. _, _, and _. Phylogeny of the unispicate taxa in Cyperaceae tribe Cariceae II: the limits of Uncinia Pers. In Sedges: uses, diversity, and systematics of the Cyperaceae, eds. R. F. C. Naczi and B. A. Ford. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden (in press).
83. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods). Version 4. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
84. THOMAS, W. W. 1984. Insect pollination of Cymophyllus fraseri (Andrews) Mackenzie. Castenea 49: 94-95.
85. THOMPSON, J. D., T. J. GIBSON, F. PLEWNIAK, F. JEANMOUGIN, and D. G. HIGGINS. 1997. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 24: 4876-4882.
86. TIMONEN, T. 1998. Inflorescence structure in the sedge tribe Cariceae (Cyperaceae). Publications in Botany from the University of Helsinki 26: 1-35.
87. TUCKERMAN, E. 1843. Enumeratio Methodica Caricum Quarundam: species recensuit et secundum habitatum pro viribus disponere tentauit. Schenecstadiae: Isaacus Riggs.
88. WHEELER, G. A. 1987. The taxonomy of Carex sect. Abditispicae sect. nov. (Cyperaceae) from austral South America. Systematic Botany 12: 572-585.
89. _. 1989a. A new species of Carex sect. Abditispicae (Cyperaceae) from northern Argentina and the status of Vesicarex collumanthus in South America. Systematic Botany 14: 37-42.
90. _. 1989b. The taxonomy of Carex sect. Aciculares (Cyperaceae) in South America. Systematic Botany 14: 168-188.
91. WOJCIECHOWSKI, M. F., M. J. SANDERSON, B. G. BALDWIN, and M. J. DONOGHUE. 1993. Monophyly of the aneuploid Astragalus (Fabaceae): evidence from the nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. American Journal of Botany 80: 711-722.
92. YANG, Z. 1993. Maximum-likelihood estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. Molecular Biology and Evolution 10: 1396-1401.
93. YEN, A. C. and R. G. OLMSTEAD. 2000. Molecular systematics of Cyperaceae tribe Cariceae based on two chloroplast DNA regions: ndhF and trnL intron-intergenic spacer. Systematic Botany 25: 479-494.
94. YODER, A. D., J. A. IRWIN, and B. A. PAYSEUR. 2001. Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow loris phylogeny. Systematic Biology 50: 408-424.
95. ZHANG, S. R. 2001. A preliminary revision of the supraspecific classification of Kobresia Willd. (Cyperaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 135: 289-294.