From horticultural plantings into wild populations: Movement of pollen and genes in Lobelia cardinalis

Plant Ecology

Volumn 197, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 55-67

  Johnson, Linda M K ^a,b   Galloway, Laura F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b CHRISTOPHER NEWPORT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Crop to wild gene flow; Gene flow; Pollen competition; Pollen flow; Siring ability

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; BIRD; GENE FLOW; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; HORTICULTURE; ISOLATED POPULATION; ORNITHOPHILY; POLLINATION; POPULATION GENETICS; WILD POPULATION;

LOBELIA; LOBELIA CARDINALIS;

EID: 44349108482     PISSN: 13850237     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11258-007-9359-9     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Adam D (2003) Transgenic crop trial's gene flow turns weeds into wimps. Nature 421:462
2. Arias DM, Rieseberg LH (1994) Gene flow between cultivated and wild sunflowers. Theor Appl Genet 89:655-660
3. Arriola PE, Ellstrand NC (1996) Crop-to-weed gene flow in the genus Sorghum (Poaceae): spontaneous interspecific hybridization between johnsongrass, Sorghum halepense, and crop sorghum, S. bicolor. Am J Bot 83:1153-1160
4. Bertin RI (1982) The ruby-throated hummingbird and its major food plants: ranges, flowering phenology, and migration. Can J Zool 60:210-219
5. Bowden WM (1948) Artificial hybrids of some North American species of Lobelia. Am J Bot 35:789
6. Brewbaker JL, Kwack BH (1963) The essential role of calcium ion in pollen germination and pollen tube growth. Am J Bot 50:859-865
7. Britton NL, Brown A (1970) An illustrated flora of the northern United States and Canada, 2nd edn. Dover Publications, New York
8. Brown BJ, Mitchell RJ, Graham SA (2002) Competition for pollination between an invasive species (purple loosestrife) and a native congener. Ecology 83:2328-2336
9. Campbell DR (1985) Pollen and gene dispersal: the influences of competition for pollination. Evolution 39:418-431
10. Campbell DR (1991) Comparing pollen dispersal and gene flow in a natural population. Evolution 45:1965-1968
11. Campbell DR, Waser NM (1989) Variation in pollen flow within and among populations of Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution 43:1444-1455
12. Carney SE, Cruzan MB, Arnold ML (1994) Reproductive interactions between hybridizing irises: analyses of pollen-tube growth and fertilization success. Am J Bot 81:1169-1175
13. Devlin B (1986) Studies on the female and male reproductive functions with a hermaphroditic species, Lobelia cardinalis. Dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
14. Devlin B, Stephenson AG (1984) Factors that influence the duration of the staminate and pistillate phases of Lobelia cardinalis flowers. Bot Gaz 145:323-328
15. Devlin B, Stephenson AG (1985) Sex differential floral longevity, nectar section, and pollinator foraging in a protandrous species. Am J Bot 72:303-310
16. Diaz A, Macnair MR (1999) Pollen tube competition as a mechanism of prezygotic reproductive isolation between Mimulus nasutus and its presumed progenitor M. guttatus. New Phytol 144:471-478
17. Doebley J (1990) Molecular evidence for gene flow among Zea species. Bioscience 40:443-448
18. Ellstrand NC (1988) Pollen as a vehicle for the escape of engineered genes. Trends Biotechnol 6:S30-S32
19. Ellstrand NC (1992) Gene flow among seed plant populations. New Forests 6:214-256
20. Ellstrand NC, Marshall DL (1985) Interpopulation gene flow by pollen in wild radish, Raphanus sativus. Am Nat 126:606-616
21. Ellstrand NC, Prentice HC, Hancock JF (1999) Gene flow and introgression from domesticated plants into their wild relatives. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30:539-563
22. Galloway L F, Etterson JR (2005) Population differentiation and hybrid success in Campanula americana: geography and genome size. J Evol Biol 18:81-89
23. Hauser TP, Jørgensen RB, Østergård H (1997) Preferential exclusion of hybrids in mixed pollinations between oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and weedy B. campestris (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 84:756-762
24. Hedrick PW (1985) Genetics of populations. Jones and Bartlett, Boston
25. Hufford KM, Mazer SJ (2003) Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends Ecol Evol 18:147-155
26. Johnson LMK (1996) The ecotype concept in an applied ecological context: the biology of two native ornamental plant species: Lobelia cardinalis and Rudbeckia hirta. MS Thesis, University of Virginia
27. Johnston MO (1991a) Natural selection on floral traits in two species of Lobelia with different pollinators. Evolution 45:1468-1479
28. Johnston MO (1991b) Pollen limitation of female reproduction in Lobelia cardinalis and L. siphilitica. Ecology 72:1500-1503
29. Johnston MO (1992) Effects of cross and self-fertilization on progeny fitness in Lobelia cardinalis and L. siphilitica. Evolution 46:688-702
30. Johnston MO (1993) Tests of two hypotheses concerning pollen competition in a self-compatible, long-styled species (Lobelia cardinalis: Lobeliaceae). Am J Bot 80:1400-1406
31. Kearns CA, Inouye DW (1993) Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press of Colorado, Niwot
32. Kirkpatrick KJ, Wilson HD (1988) Interspecific gene flow in Cucurbita; C. texana vs. C. pepo. Am J Bot 75:519-527
33. Klinger T, Arriola PE, Ellstrand NC (1992) Crop-weed hybridization in radish (Raphanus sativus): effects of distance and population size. Am J Bot 79:1431-1435
34. Klinger T, Elam DR, Ellstrand NC (1991) Radish as a model system for the study of engineered gene escape rates via crop-weed mating. Cons Biol 5:531-535
35. Kunin WE (1993) Sex and the single mustard: population density and pollinator behavior effects on seed-set. Ecology 74:2145-2160
36. Levin DA (1981) Dispersal versus gene flow in plants. Ann Mo Bot Garden 68:223-253
37. Li Y, Cheng Z, Smith W, Ellis D, Chen Y, Zheng X, Pei Y,Luo K, Zhao D, Yao Q, Duan H, Li Q (2004) Invasive ornamental plants: problems, challenges, and molecular tools to neutralize their invasiveness. Crit Rev Plant Sci 23:381-389
38. Linhart YB (1973) Ecological and behavioral determinants of pollen dispersal in hummingbird pollinated Heliconia. Am Nat 107:511-523
39. Lynch M (1991) The genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution 45:622-629
40. McKay JK, Christian CE, Harrison S, Rice KJ (2005) "How local is local?"-a review of practical and conceptual issues in the genetics of restoration. Rest Ecol 13:432-440
41. Mulcahy DL (1975) Gamete competition in plants and animals. North-Holland, Amsterdam
42. Muth N (2003) Gene flow might turn wimps into superweeds. Nature 421:785-786
43. Nagy ES, Rice KJ (1997) Local adaptation in two subspecies of an annual plant: implications for migration and gene flow. Evolution 51:1079-1089
44. Papa R, Gepts P (2003) Asymmetry of gene flow and differential geographical structure of molecular diversity in wild and domesticated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) from Mesoamerica. Theor Appl Genet 106:239-250
45. Pyke GH (1981) Optimal foraging in hummingbirds: rule of movement between inflorescences. Anim Behav 29:889-896
46. Rademaker MCJ, De Jong TJ (1998) Effects of flower number on estimated pollen transfer in natural populations of three hermaphroditic species: an experiment with fluorescent dye. J Evol Biol 11:623-641
47. Raybould AF, Gray AJ (1993) Genetically modified crops and hybridization with wild relatives: a UK perspective. J Appl Ecol 30:199-219
48. Richards CM, Church S, McCauley DE (1999) The influence of population size and isolation on gene flow by pollen in Silene alba. Evolution 53:63-73
49. SAS Institute (2003) SAS/STAT version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary
50. Schulke B, Waser NM (2001) Long-distance pollinator flights and pollen dispersal between populations of Delphinium nuttallianum. Oecologia 127:239-245
51. Skogsmyr I, Lankinen A (1999) Selection on pollen competitive ability in relation to stochastic factors influencing pollen deposition. Evol Ecol Res 1:971-985
52. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York
53. Smyth CA, Hamrick JL (1987) Realized gene flow via pollen in artificial populations of musk thistle, Carduus nutans L. Evolution 41:613-619
54. Snow AA, Palma PM (1997) Commercialization of transgenic plants: potential ecological risks. BioScience 47:86-96
55. Snow AA, Pilson D, Rieseberg LH, Paulsen MJ, Pleskac N, Reagon MR, Wolf DE, Selbo SM (2003) A Bt transgene reduces herbivory and enhances fecundity in wild sunflowers. Ecol Appl 13:279-286
56. Song ZP, Lu BR, Zhu YG, Chen JK (2003) Gene flow from cultivated rice to the wild species Oryza rufipogon under experimental field conditions. New Phytol 157:657-665
57. Strausbaugh PD, Core EL (1977) Flora of West Virginia, 2nd edn. Seneca Books, Grantsville
58. Thomson JD, Price MV, Waser NM, Stratton DA (1986) Comparative studies of pollen and fluorescent dye transport by bumble bees visiting Erythronium grandiflorum. Oecologia 69:561-566
59. Waser NM (1988) Comparative pollen and dye transfer by pollinators of Delphinium nelsonii. Funct Ecol 2:41-48
60. Waser NM, Price MV (1982) A comparison of pollen and fluorescent dye carry-over by natural pollinators of Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae). Ecology 63:1168-1172
61. Webb CJ, Bawa KS (1983) Pollen dispersal by hummingbirds and butterflies: a comparative study of two lowland tropical plants. Evolution 37:1258-1270
62. Werth CR (1985) Implementing an isozyme laboratory at a field station. Va J Sci 36:53-76
63. Whelan RJ, Roberts DG, England PR, Ayre DJ (2006) The potential for genetic contamination vs. augmentation by native plants in urban gardens. Biol Conserv 128:493-500
64. Whitton JD, Wolf E, Arias DM, Snow AA, Rieseberg LH (1997) The persistence of cultivar alleles in wild populations of sunflowers five generations after hybridization. Theor Appl Genet 95:33-40
65. Willi Y, Van Buskirk J (2005) Genomic compatibility occurs over a wide range of parental genetic similarity in an outcrossing plant. Proc R Soc B 272:1333-1338
66. Wilson H, Manhart J (1993) Crop/weed gene flow: Chenopodium quinoa Willd. and C. berlandieri Moq. Theor Appl Genet 86:642-648
67. Wolf LL, Hainsworth FR (1991) Hummingbird foraging patterns: visits to clumps of Ipomopsis aggregata inflorescences. Anim Behav 41:803-812