Evaluation of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Shoulder Pain: Are We Doing the Best We Can?

Clinics in Sports Medicine

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 491-505

  Michener, Lori A ^a   Snyder, Alison R ^b  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b A T STILL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; LABORATORY TEST; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF REPORT; SHORT FORM 36; SHOULDER GIRDLE; SHOULDER PAIN; SPORT INJURY; SURGEON; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

DISABILITY EVALUATION; HUMANS; PAIN MEASUREMENT; QUALITY OF LIFE; SHOULDER PAIN;

EID: 44149102203     PISSN: 02785919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2008.03.001     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Testa M.A., and Simonson D.C. Assessment of quality-of-life outcomes. N Engl J Med 334 13 (1996) 835-840
2. Kirkley A., and Griffin S. Development of disease-specific quality of life measurement tools. Arthroscopy 19 10 (2003) 1121-1128
3. Eechaute C., Vaes P., Van Aerschot L., et al. The clinimetric qualities of patient-assessed instruments for measuring chronic ankle instability: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 8 (2007) 6
4. Institute of Medicine. Health professions education: a bridge to quality (2003), Institute of Medicine, Washington, DC
5. Pew Health Professions Commission. Critical challenges: revitalizing the health professions for the twenty-first century (1995), Pew Charitable Trust
6. Snyder AR, Parsons JT, Valovich McLeod TC, et al. Utilizing disablement models and clinical outcomes assessment to enable evidence-based athletic training pracitce: part I-disablement models. J Athl Train, in Press.
7. Bot S.D., Terwee C.B., van der Windt D.A., et al. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis 63 4 (2004) 335-341
8. Fayad F., Mace Y., Lefevre-Colau M.M., et al. [Measurement of shoulder disability in the athlete: a systematic review.]. Ann Readapt Med Phys 47 6 (2004) 389-395 [in French]
9. Kirkley A., Griffin S., and Dainty K. Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder. Arthroscopy 19 10 (2003) 1109-1120
10. Michener L.A., and Leggin B.G. A review of self-report scales for the assessment of functional limitation and disability of the shoulder. J Hand Ther 14 2 (2001) 68-76
11. Snyder A.R., Valovich McLeod T.C., and Sauers E.L. Defining, valuing, and teaching clinical outcomes assessment in professional and post-professional athletic training education programs. Athletic Training Education Journal 2 Apr-Jun (2007) 1-11
12. Valovich McLeod TC, Snyder AR, Parsons JT, et al. Utilizing disablement models and clinical outcomes assessment to enable evidence-based athletic training practice: part II-clinical outcomes assessment. J Ath Train, in press.
13. Binkley J. Measurement of functional status, progress and outcome in orthopaedic clinical practice. Orthopaedic Physical Therapy Practice 11 (1999) 14-21
14. Cross K.M., Worrell T.W., Leslie J.E., et al. The relationship between self-reported and clinical measures and the number of days to return to sport following acute lateral ankle sprains. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 32 1 (2002) 16-23
15. Irrgang J.J., and Anderson A.F. Development and validation of health-related quality of life measures for the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 402 (2002) 95-109
16. Deyo R.A. Using outcomes to improve quality of research and quality of care. J Am Board Fam Pract 11 6 (1998) 465-473
17. Osoba D. Lessons learned from measuring health-related quality of life in oncology. J Clin Oncol 12 3 (1994) 608-616
18. Tanner S.M., Dainty K.N., Marx R.G., et al. Knee-specific quality-of-life instruments: Which ones measure symptoms and disabilities most important to patients?. Am J Sports Med 35 9 (2007) 1450-1458
19. Guyatt G.H., Ferrans C.E., Halyard M.Y., et al. Exploration of the value of health-related quality-of-life information from clinical research and into clinical practice. Mayo Clin Proc 82 10 (2007) 1229-1239
20. Wilson I.B., and Cleary P.D. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA 273 1 (1995) 59-65
21. Whiteneck G. Conceptual models of disability: past, present, and future. Workshop on disability in America: a new look (2006), The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
22. Jette A.M. Physical disablement concepts for physical therapy research and practice. Phys Ther 74 5 (1994) 380-386
23. Nagi S. Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation. In: Sussman M. (Ed). Sociology and rehabilitation (1965), American Sociological Association, Washington, DC 100-113
24. World Health Organization. ICF-English. Available at:. http://www3.who.int/icf/onlinebrowser/icf.cfm Accessed November 22, 2006
25. World Health Organization. ICF introduction. Available at:. http://www3.who.int/icf/intros/ICF-Eng-Intro.pdf Accessed October 20, 2006
26. Quinn L., and Gordon J. Functional outcomes documentation for rehabilitation (2003), W.B. Saunders Company, St. Louis (MO)
27. World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF (2002), World Health Organization, Geneva (IL)
28. Board on Health Science Policy-IOM. The future of disability in America (2007), The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
29. Threats T.T. Towards an international framework for communication disorders: use of the ICF. J Commun Disord 39 4 (2006) 251-265
30. Jette A.M. The changing language of disablement. Phys Ther 85 2 (2005) 118-119
31. Jette A.M. Toward a common language for function, disability, and health. Phys Ther 86 5 (2006) 726-734
32. Levack W. The international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF)-application to physiotherapy. New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy 32 1 (2004) 1-2
33. Hudak P.L., Amadio P.C., and Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand). The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). [corrected]. Am J Ind Med 29 6 (1996) 602-608
34. Williams G.N., Gangel T.J., Arciero R.A., et al. Comparison of the single assessment numeric evaluation method and two shoulder rating scales. Outcomes measures after shoulder surgery. Am J Sports Med 27 2 (1999) 214-221
35. Gabel C.P., Michener L.A., Burkett B., et al. The upper limb functional index: development and determination of reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Hand Ther 19 3 (2006) 328-348 [quiz: 349]
36. Guyatt G., Walter S., and Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis 40 2 (1987) 171-178
37. Nunnally J.C., and Bernstein I.H. Psychometric theory (1994), McGraw-Hill, New York
38. Portney L.G., and Watkins M.P. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 2nd edition (2000), Prentice Hall Health, Upper Saddle River (NJ)
39. Cronbach L.J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16 (1951) 297-334
40. Brinker M.R., Cuomo J.S., Popham G.J., et al. An examination of bias in shoulder scoring instruments among healthy collegiate and recreational athletes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11 5 (2002) 463-469
41. Soldatis J.J., Moseley J.B., and Etminan M. Shoulder symptoms in healthy athletes: a comparison of outcome scoring systems. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 6 3 (1997) 265-271
42. Ware Jr. J.E., and Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30 6 (1992) 473-483
43. Ware Jr. J.E., Snow K.K., Kosinski M., et al. SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide (1993), The Health Institute, Boston
44. McHorney C.A., Ware Jr. J.E., Lu J.F., et al. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 32 1 (1994) 40-66
45. Beaton D.E., Katz J.N., Fossel A.H., et al. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther. 14 2 (2001) 128-146
46. Gummesson C., Atroshi I., and Ekdahl C. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 4 (2003) 11
47. Kirkley A., Griffin S., McLintock H., et al. The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for shoulder instability. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Am J Sports Med 26 6 (1998) 764-772
48. Marx R.G., Bombardier C., and Wright J.G. What do we know about the reliability and validity of physical examination tests used to examine the upper extremity?. J Hand Surg [Am] 24 1 (1999) 185-193
49. Schmitt J.S., and Di Fabio R.P. Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria. J Clin Epidemiol 57 10 (2004) 1008-1018
50. Richards R.R., An K.N., Biglianai L.U., et al. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 3 (1994) 347-352
51. Beaton D.E., and Richards R.R. Measuring function of the shoulder. A cross-sectional comparison of five questionnaires. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78 6 (1996) 882-890
52. Goldhahn J., Angst F., Drerup S., et al. Lessons learned during the cross-cultural adaptation of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder form into German. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17 2 (2008) 248-254
53. Kocher M.S., Horan M.P., Briggs K.K., et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons subjective shoulder scale in patients with shoulder instability, rotator cuff disease, and glenohumeral arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 9 (2005) 2006-2011
54. Michener L.A., McClure P.W., and Sennett B.J. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons standardized shoulder assessment form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11 6 (2002) 587-594
55. Skutek M., Fremerey R.W., Zeichen J., et al. Outcome analysis following open rotator cuff repair. Early effectiveness validated using four different shoulder assessment scales. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 120 7-8 (2000) 432-436
56. Lippitt S.B., Harryman II D.T., and Matsen F.A. A practical tool for evaluation of function: the simple shoulder test. In: Matsen III F.A.F.F., and Hawkins R.J. (Eds). The shoulder: a balance of mobility and stability (1993), American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rosemont (IL)
57. Beaton D., and Richards R.R. Assessing the reliability and responsiveness of 5 shoulder questionnaires. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 7 6 (1998) 565-572
58. Godfrey J., Hamman R., Lowenstein S., et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the simple shoulder test: psychometric properties by age and injury type. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16 3 (2007) 260-267
59. Roddey T.S., Olson S.L., Cook K.F., et al. Comparison of the University of California-Los Angeles shoulder scale and the simple shoulder test with the shoulder pain and disability index: single-administration reliability and validity. Phys Ther 80 8 (2000) 759-768
60. van der Windt D.A., van der Heijden G.J., de Winter A.F., et al. The responsiveness of the shoulder disability questionnaire. Ann Rheum Dis 57 2 (1998) 82-87
61. de Winter A.F., van der Heijden G.J., Scholten R.J., et al. The shoulder disability questionnaire differentiated well between high and low disability levels in patients in primary care, in a cross-sectional study. J Clin Epidemiol 60 11 (2007) 1156-1163
62. Paul A., Lewis M., Shadforth M.F., et al. A comparison of four shoulder-specific questionnaires in primary care. Ann Rheum Dis 63 10 (2004) 1293-1299
63. Van der Heijden G.J.M.G., Leffers P., and Bouter L.M. Shoulder disability questionnaire: design and responsiveness of a functional status measures. J Clin Epidemiol 53 (2000) 29-38
64. Constant C.R., and Murley A.H. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214 (1987) 160-164
65. Leggin B.G., Michener L.A., Shaffer M.A., et al. The Penn shoulder score: reliability and validity. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 36 3 (2006) 138-151
66. MacDermid J.C., Solomon P., Law M., et al. Defining the effect and mediators of two knowledge translation strategies designed to alter knowledge, intent and clinical utilization of rehabilitation outcome measures: a study protocol [NCT00298727]. Implement Sci 1 (2006) 14