Two plus two does not equal three: Statistical testa for multiple genome comparison

Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-22

  Raghupathy, Narayanan ^a   Hoberman, Rose ^b   Durand, Dannie ^a,b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Conserved linkage; Conserved synteny; Gene clusters; Spatial genomics

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; GENE CLUSTER; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC MODEL; GENOME; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; BASE SEQUENCE; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MULTIGENE FAMILY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 44049103784     PISSN: 02197200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219720008003242     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Hurst L, Pál C, Lercher M, The evolutionary dynamics of eukaryotic gene order, Nat Rev Genet 5(4):299-310, 2004.
2. Venter J et al., The sequence of the human genome, Science 291(5507):1304-1351, 2001.
3. Calabrese P, Chakravarty S, Vision T, Fast identification and statistical evaluation of segmental homologies in comparative maps, Bioinformancs 19(Suppl 1):i74-i80, 2003.
4. Durand D, Sankoff D, Tests for gene clustering. J Comput Biol 10(3-4): 453-482, 2003.
5. Hoberman R, Sankoff D, Durand D, The statistical analysis of spatially clustered genes under the maximum gap criterion, J Comput Biol 12(8):1081-1100, 2005.
6. McLysaght A, Hokamp K, Wolfe K, Extensive genomic duplication during early chordate evolution, Nat Genet 31(2):200-204, 2002.
7. Raghupathy N, Durand D, Individual gene cluster statistics in noisy maps, in RECOMB 2005 Workshop on Comparative Genomics, Vol. 3678 of LNBI, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 106-120, 2005.
8. Trachtulec Z, Forejt J, Synteny of orthologous genes conserved in mammals, snake, fly, nematode, and fission yeast, Mamm Genome 3 12):227-231, 2001.
9. Vandepoele K, Saeys Y, Simillion C, Raes J, Van De Peer Y, The automatic detection of homologous regions (ADHoRe) and its application to microcolinearity between Arabidopsis and rice, Genome Res 12(11):1792-1801, 2002.
10. Blanc G, Hokamp K, Wolfe K, A recent polyploidy superimposed on older large-scale duplications in the Arabidopsis genome, Genome Res 13(2):137-144, 2003.
11. Dehal P, Boore J, Two rounds of whole genome duplication in the ancestral vertebrate, PLoS Biol 3(10):e314, 2005.
12. Fujibuchi W, Ogata H, Matsuda H, Kanchisa M, Automatic detection of conserved gene clusters in multiple genomes by graph compaxison and P-quasi grouping, Nucleic Acids Res 28(20):4029-4036, 2000.
13. He X, Goldwasser M, Identifying conserved gene clusters in the presence of homology families, J Comput Biol 12(6):638-656, 2005.
14. Luc N, Risler J, Bergeron A, Raffinot M, Gene teams: A new formalization of gene clusters for comparative genomics, Comput Biol Chem 27 1):59-67, 2003.
15. Mau B, Darling A, Perna N, Identifying evolutionarily conserved segments among multiple divergent and rearranged genomes, in Lagergren J (ed.), RECOMB Satellite Workshop on Comparative Genomics, Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 72-84, 2004.
16. Ogata H, Fujibuchi W, Goto S, Kanehisa M, A heuristic graph comparison algorithm and its application to detect functionally related enzyme clusters, Nucleic Acids Res 28(20):4021-4028, 2000.
17. Pasek S, Bergeron A, Risler J, Louis A, Ollivier E, Raffinot M, Identification of. genomic features using domain teams, Technical Report 01-07-2004-LGI, Laboratoire Génome et Informatique, Evry, France, 2004.
18. Jaillon O et al., Genome duplication in the teleost fish Tetraodon nigroviridis reveals the early vertebrate proto-karyotype, Nature 431(7011):946-957, 2004.
19. Ku H, Vision T, Liu J, Tanksley S, Comparing sequenced segments of the tomato and Arabidopsis genomes: Large-scale duplication followed by selective gene loss creates a network of synteny, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(16):9121-9126, 2000.
20. Vandepoele K, Simillion C, Van de Peer Y, Detecting the undetectable: Uncovering duplicated segments in Arabidopsis by comparison with rice, Trends Genet 18(12):604-606, 2002.
21. Vandepoele K, Simillion C, Van de Peer Y, Evidence that rice and other cereals are ancient aneuploids, Plant Cell 15(9):2192-2202, 2003.
22. Scannell D, Byrne K, Gordon J, Wong S, Wolfe K, Multiple rounds of speciation associated with reciprocal gene loss in polyploid yeasts, Nature 440(7082):341-345, 2006.
23. Simillion C, Vandepoele K, Van de Peer Y, Recent developments in computational approaches for uncovering genomic homology, Bioessays 26(11):1225-1235, 2004.
24. Olinski R, Lundin L, Hallböök F, Conserved synteny between the Ciona genome and human paralogons identifies large duplications events in the molecular evolution of the insulin-relaxin gene family, Mol Biol Evol 23(1):10-22, 2006.
25. Tatusov R, Koonin E, Lipman D, A genomic perspective on protein families, Science 278(5338):631-637, 1997.
26. Byrne KP, Wolfe K, The Yeast Gene Order Browser: Combining curated homology and syntenic context reveals gene fate in polyploid species, Genome Res 15(10):1456-1461, 2005.
27. Kellis M, Birren B, Lander E, Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Nature 428(6983):617-624, 2004.