Globalization and science education: The implications of science in the new economy

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 617-633

  Carter, Lyn ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

General science; Social change; Sociocultural issues

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; PRIVATIZATION; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

GENERAL SCIENCE; SOCIAL CHANGE; SOCIOCULTURAL ISSUES;

EDUCATION;

EID: 43949134902     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: 10982736     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20189     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Adam, B., Beck, U., & Van Loon, J. (Eds.). (2000). Risk society and beyond: Critical issues for social theory. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
2. Ancarani, V. (1995). Globalizing the world: Science and technology in international relations. In S. Jasanoff, G.E. Markle, J.C. Petersen, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 652-670). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
3. Apple, M.W. (2001). Educating the "right" way. New York: Routledge Falmer.
4. Appelbaum, P. (2001). Pastiche science: Bringing cultural studies of science to education and education to the cultural studies of science. In J.A. Weaver, M. Morris, & P. Appelbaum (Eds.), (Post) Modern science (education): Propositions and alternative paths (pp. 111-127). New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
5. Ball, S.J. (2000). Performativities and fabrications in the educational economy: Towards the performative society? Australian Educational Researcher, 27, 1-24.
6. Beck, U. (2000). What is globalization? Cambridge: Polity Press.
7. Bennett, O. (2001). Cultural pessimism: Narratives of decline in the postmodern world. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
8. Bianchini, J.A., & Kelly, G.J. (2003). Challenges of standards-based reform: The example of California's science content standards and textbook adoption process. Science Education, 87, 378-389.
9. Bové, P.A. (1996). Afterword: "Global/local" memory and thought. In R. Wilson & W. Dissanayake (Eds.), Global/local: Cultural production and the transnational imaginary (pp. 372-385). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
10. Britzman, D.P. (1998). Lost subjects, contested objects. Towards a psychoanalytic inquiry of learning. Albany: NY: State University of New York Press.
11. Brown, P., & Lauder, H. ( 1996). Education, globalisation and economic development. Journal of Educational Policy, 11, 1-25.
12. Carter, L. (2004). Thinking differently about cultural diversity: Using postcolonial theory to (re)read science education. Science Education, 88, 819-836.
13. Carter, L. (2005a). Globalisation and science education: Rethinking science education reforms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 561-580.
14. Carter, L. (2005b). Globalisation and science education. In J. Zajda (Ed.), The international handbook globalisation and education policy research ((Vol. 2, pp. 733-744). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
15. Carter, L. (2007a). Repositioning science education research: The challenges of globalisation. In B. Atweh, M. Borba, A. Calabrese Barton, D. Clark, N. Gough, C. Keitel, C. Vistro-Yu, & R. Vithal (Eds.), Internationalisation and globalisation in mathematics and science education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
16. Carter, L. (2007b). New agendas for science education: Globalisation, postcolonialism & sustainability. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publications.
17. Carter, L. (2007c). Sociocultural influences on science education: innovation for contemporary times. Manuscript submitted for publication.
18. Castells, M. (1996). The Information age: Economy, society and culture: Vol. 1. The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
19. Cherryholmes, C. (1999). Reading pragmatism. New York: Teachers College Press.
20. Cohen, L., Duberley, J., & McAuley, J. (1999). The purpose and process of science: Contrasting understandings in UK research establishments. R&D Management, 29, 233245.
21. Cohen, L., McAuley, J., & Duberley, J. (2001). Continuity in discontinuity: Changing discourses of science in a market economy. Science, Technology & Human Values, 26, 145-166.
22. Costa, S., Hughes, T.B., & Pinch, T. (1998). Bringing it all back home: Some implications of recent science and technology studies for the classroom science teacher. Research in Science Education, 28, 9-21.
23. Cozzens, S. E. (1999). Are new accountability rules bad for science? Issues in Science and Technology, 15, 59-66.
24. Delanty, G. (1999). Biopolitics in the risk society: The possibility of a global ethic of societal responsibility. In P. O'Mahony (Ed.), Nature, risk and responsibility: discourses of biotechnology (pp. 37-51). Houndmills, UK: Macmillan Press Ltd.
25. Dickinson, Q.T. (2000). Reconciling research and the patent system. Issues in Science and Technology, 16, 64-70.
26. Duggan, S., & Gott, R. (2002). What sort of science education do we really need? International Journal of Science Education, 24, 661-672.
27. Eisenhart, M. (1998). On the subject of interpretative reviews. Review of Educational Research, 68, 391-399.
28. Etzkowitz, H. (1997). From zero-sum to value-added strategies: The emergence of knowledge-based industrial policy in the states of the United States. Policy Studies Journal, 25, 412-425.
29. Featherstone, M., & Lash, S. (Eds.). (1999). Spaces of culture: City, nation, world. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
30. Fensham, P.J. (1992). Science and technology. In P.W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 789-829). New York: Macmillan Education Pty Ltd.
31. Friedman, J. (2000). Americans again, or the new age of imperial reason? Global elite formation, its identity and ideological discourses. Theory, Culture, & Society, 17, 139-146.
32. Fuller, S. (2000). The governance of science: Ieology and the future of society. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
33. Galiston, P., & Stump, D. (Eds.). (1996). The disunity of science: boundaries, contexts, and power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
34. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
35. Goldsmith, L.T., & Pasquale, M.M. (2002). Providing school and district-level support for science education reform. Science Educator, 11, 24-32.
36. Goonatilake, S. (1998). Towards a global science: Mining civilizational knowledge. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
37. Gough, N. (2003). Thinking globally in environmental education: Some implications for internationalizing curriculum inquiry. In W.F. Pinar (Ed.), Handbook of international curriculum research. New York: Erlbaum.
38. Haggerson, N.L. (1991). Philosophical inquiry: Amplitative criticism. In E.C. Short (Ed.), Forms of curriculum inquiry (pp. 43-60). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
39. Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of hope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
40. Hirst, P., & Thompson, G. (1996). Globalization in question. Cambridge: Polity Press.
41. Hunt, M.W. (1999). New national policy needed. Advanced Materials & Processes, 155, 2-3.
42. Hurd, P. (2002). Modernizing science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 3-9.
43. Jacob, M. (1997). Scientific culture and the making of the industrial west. New York: Oxford University Press.
44. Jameson, F. (1998). Notes on globalization as a philosophical issue. In F. Jameson & M. Miyoshi (Eds.), The cultures of globalization (pp. 33-54). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
45. Jenkins, E.W., & Nelson, N.W. (2005). Important but not for me: Students' attitudes towards secondary school science in England. Research in Science & Technology Education, 23, 41-57.
46. Kates, R.W., Clark, W.C., Corell, R., Hall, M.J., Jaeger, C.C., Lowe, I., McCarthy, J.J., Schellnhuber, H.J., Bolin, B., Dickson, M.N., Faucheux, S., Gallopin, G.C., Grübler, A., Huntley, B., Jäger, J., Jodha, N.S., Kasperson, R.E., Mabogunje, A., Matson, P., Mooney, H., Moore, B., O'Riordan, T., & Svedin, U. (2001). Environment and development: sustainability science. Science, 292, 641-642.
47. Khishfe, R., & Lederman, N. (2006). Teaching nature of science within a controversial topic: Integrated versus non-integrated. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 395-418.
48. Kelly, G.J., & Chen, C. (1999). The sound of music: Constructing science as sociocultural practices through oral and written discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 883-915.
49. Larson, C.F. (2000). The boom in industry research. Issues in Science and Technology, 16, 27-31.
50. Lash, S., & Featherstone, M. (2001). Recognition and difference: Politics, identity, multiculture. Theory, Culture & Society, 18, 1-19.
51. Lemanowski, V., Baker, D.R., & Piburn, M.D. (2002). Editorial: Report from the editors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, iii-viii.
52. Livingston, G. (1999). Beyond watching over established ways: A review as recasting the literature, recasting the lived, Review of Educational Research, 69, 9-19.
53. Madison, J.J., (2000). Agenda-building and big science. Policy Sciences, 33, 31-53.
54. Mayo, P., Donnelly, M.B., Nash, P.P., & Schwartz, R.W. (1993). Student perceptions of tutor effectiveness in problem based surgery clerkship. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 5, 227-233.
55. McGinn, M., & Roth, W.-M. (1999). Preparing students for competent scientific practice: Implications of recent research in science and technology studies. Educational Researcher, 28, 14-24.
56. Meadows, D., Randers, J., & Meadows, D. (2004). Limits to growth: The 30-year update. Chelsea, MI: Chelsea Green Publishing Company.
57. Murray, F., & Raths, J. (1994). Call for manuscripts. Review of Educational Research, 64, 197-200.
58. Nederveen Pieterse, J. (2000). Globalization north and south: Representations of uneven development and the interaction of modernities. Theory, Culture & Society, 17, 129-137.
59. O'Mahony, P. (Ed.). (1999). Nature, risk, and responsibility. Discourses of biotechnology. Houndmills, UK: Macmillan Press Ltd.
60. Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R (2003). What "ideas-aboutscience" should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 692-720.
61. Paltridge, G. (2005). Are there too many science PhDs. Counterpoint (Producer M. Duffey). Sydney: ABC Radio Broadcast.
62. Paolini, A. (1999). Navigating modernity. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reiner Publishers.
63. Paty, M. (1999). Comparative history of modern science and the context of dependency. Science, Technology & Society, 4, 171-203.
64. Pielke, R.A., Jr., & Byerly, R., Jr. (1998). Beyond basic and applied. Physics Today, February, 42-46.
65. Proctor, R. (1991). Value-free science? Purity and power in modern knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66. Ravetz, J.R. (1999). What is post-normal science. Futures, 31, 647-653.
67. Reich, R.B. (1991). The work of nations: Preparing ourselves for 21st century capitalism. London: Simon & Schuster.
68. Ross, A. (Ed.). (1996). Science wars. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
69. Rothman, H., Glasner, P., & Adams, C. (1996). Proteins, plants and currents: Rediscovering science in Britain. In A. Irwin & B. Wynne (Eds.), Misunderstanding science. The public reconstruction of science and technology (pp. 191-211). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70. Santos, B. (2001). Nuestra america: Reinventing a subaltern paradigm of recognition and redistribution. Theory into Practice, 18, 185-217.
71. Schwandt, T.A. (1998). The interpretative review of educational matters: Is there any other kind? Review of Educational Research, 68, 409-412.
72. Segesvary, V (1998). From illusion to delusion: Globalization and the contradictions of late modernity. San Francisco, CA: International Scholars Publications.
73. Sennett, R. (1998). The corrosion of character: the personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
74. Shiva, V. (2002). Water wars: Privatization, pollution and profit. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
75. Shrum, W., & Shenhav, Y. (1995). Science and technology in less developed countries. In S. Jasanoff, G.E. Markle, J.C Petersen, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 627-651). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
76. Slaughter, S., & Rhoads, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
77. Southerland, S., Gess-Newsome, J., & Johnston, A. (2003). Portraying science in the classroom: The manifestation of scientists' beliefs in classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 669-691.
78. Stokes, D.E. (1997). Pasteur's quadrant. Basic science and technology innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
79. Swyngedouw, E. (1997). Neither global nor local: " glocalisation" and the politics of scale. In K. Cox (Ed.), Spaces of globalisation. Reasserting the power of the local (pp. 137-166). New York: Guilford Press.
80. Varma, R. (2000). Changing research cultures in U.S. industry. Science, Technology & Human Values, 25, 395-416.
81. Walsh, E.J. (1999). Advisors take reins to urge corporate focus on global technology leadership. Signal, 53, 5-6.
82. Weaver, J.A. (2001). Introduction. (Post)modern science (education): Propositions and alternative paths. In J.A. Weaver, M. Morris, & P. Appelbaum (Eds.), (Post) modern science (education): Propositions and alternative paths (pp. 1 -21 ). New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
83. Wiseman, J. (1998). Global nation?: Australia and the politics of globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
84. Ziman, J. (2000). Real science: What it is and what it means. Cambridge: Cambridge University.