Post-stroke inpatient rehabilitation: II. Predicting discharge disposition

American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 75, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 431-436

  Brosseau, Lucie ^a   Potvin, Louise ^b   Philippe, Pierre ^b   Boulanger, Yves Louis ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Activities of Daily Living; Destination; Disability; Hemiplegia; Outcome and Process Assessment; Predictive Validity; Rehabilitation; Self care

Indexed keywords

ACUTE STROKE REHABILITATION PROGRAM;

HANDICAPPED PERSONS; MEDICINE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

PATIENT REHABILITATION;

ARTICLE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; GAIT; HEMIPLEGIA; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; SOCIAL SUPPORT; STROKE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CEREBROVASCULAR DISORDERS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCULOSKELETAL EQUILIBRIUM; ODDS RATIO; PROGNOSIS; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 0030292412     PISSN: 08949115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00002060-199611000-00006     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Wood-Dauphinee S: The epidemiology of stroke: relevance for physical therapists. Physiother Can 1985;37:377-386.
2. Hamilton BB, Granger CV, Sherwin FS, Zielezny M, Tashman JS: A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation system (UDS), in Fuhrer JM (ed): Rehabilitation Outcomes: Analysis and Measurement. Baltimore, Brookes, 1987.
3. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Gresham GE, Kramer AA: The stroke rehabilitation outcome study. Part II. Relative merits of the total Barthel index score and a four-item subscore in predicting patient outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989,70:100-103.
4. Heinemann AW, Roth EJ, Cichowski K, Betts HB: Multivariate analysis of improvement and outcome following stroke rehabilitation. Arch Neurol 1987;44:1167-1172.
5. Keith RA: Conceptual basis of outcome measures. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1995;74:73-80.
6. Oczkowski WJ, Barreca S: The Functional Independence Measure: its use to identify rehabilitation needs in stroke survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:1291-1294.
7. Osberg JS, Dejong G, Haley SM, Seward ML, McGinnnis GE, Germaine J: Predicting long-term outcome among post-rehabilitation stroke patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1988;68: 94-103.
8. Thorngren M, VVestling B, Norving B: Outcome after stroke in patients discharged to independent living. Stroke 1990;21: 236-240.
9. Wilson DB, Houle DM, Keith RA: Stroke rehabilitation: a model predicting return home in rehabilitation medicine-adding life to years (special issue). West J Med 1991;154:587-590.
10. Bélanger L, Bolduc M, Noël M: Relative importance of after-effects, environment and socio-economic factors on the social integration of stroke victims. Int J Rehabil Res 1988;11: 251-260.
11. Dejong G, Branch G: Predicting the stroke patient's ability to live independently. Stroke 1982;13:648-655.
12. Kelly-Hayes M: Time intervals, survival, and destination: three crucial variables in stroke outcome research. Stroke 1990; 21(suppl II):24-26.
13. Kelly-Hayes M, D'Agostino RB, Gresham GE: Factors influencing survival and need for institutionalization following stroke: the Framingham study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988;69: 415-418.
14. Mayo NE, Hendlisz J, Golberg MS, Korner-Bitensky N, Becker R, Coopersmith H: Destinations of stroke patients discharged from the Montreal area acute-care hospitals. Stroke 1989;20:351-356.
15. Béland F: Les hommes et les femmes âgées et leurs sources d'aide. Sci Sociales et Santé 1992;2:63-77.
16. Evans RL, Hendricks RD, Haselkorn JK, Bishop DS, Baldwin D: The family's role in stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1992;72:135-139.
17. Evans RL, Bishop DS, Haselkorn JK: Factors predicting satisfactory home care after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991;72:144-147.
18. Evans RL, Northwood LK: Social needs in adjustment to stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983;64:61-64.
19. Gowland C: Predicting sensorimotor recovery following stroke rehabilitation. Physiother Can 1984;36:313-320.
20. Harvey RF, Silverstein B, Venzon MA, et al.: Applying psychometric criteria to functional assessment in medical rehabilitation. III. Construct validity and predicting level of care. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73:887-892.
21. Hyman M: Social psychological determinants of patients' performance in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1972;53:217-226.
22. Lehmann JF, De Lateur BJ, Fowler RS: Stroke rehabilitation: outcome and prediction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1975;56: 383-389.
23. Brosseau L, Philippe P, Potvin L, Boulanger YL: Predicting post-stroke inpatient rehabilitation length of stay, part I. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1996;75:422-430.
24. Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS: The Functional Independence Measure: a new tool for rehabilitation, in Eisenberg ME (eds): Advances in Clinical Rehabilitation. New York, Springer, 1987;
25. SM), Version 3.0. Buffalo, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1990.
26. Audet M, Boulanger YL: Guide d'utilisation pour la collecte des données de la M. I. F. (mesure de l'indépendance fonctionnelle) à l'aide du "uniform data set for medical rehabilitation". Montréal, Institut de Réadaptation de Montréal, 1990.
27. Duke University Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development: Multidimensional functional assessment: the OARS methodology, in Kane RA, Kane RL (eds): Assessing the Elderly: A Practical Guide to Measurement. Lexington, Lexington Books, 1984, pp 166-168.
28. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S: Applied Logistic Regressions. New-York, John VViley & Sons, 1989.
29. BMDP: Statistical Software Manual Vol I & II. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1989.
30. Garraway WM, Akhtar AJ, Smith DL, Smith ME: The triage of stroke rehabilitation. J Epidemiol Community Health 1981;35: 39-44.
31. Brosseau L, Potvin L, Philippe P, Boulanger Y-L, Dutil E: Construct validation study of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) applied to stroke patients. Physiotherapy: Theory and Practice (in press).
32. Hsieh FY: Sample size tables for logistic regression. Stat Med 1989;8:795-802.