Utilization of external accident information in companies' safety promotion - Case: Finnish metal and transportation industry

Safety Science

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 802-814

  Lind, Salla ^a   Kivistö Rahnasto, Jouni ^b  

^a VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

^b TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Accident reporting; External information; Safety promotion

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; CASE BASED REASONING; METAL FINISHING; RISK MANAGEMENT; SAFE HANDLING;

ACCIDENT REPORTING; EXTERNAL INFORMATION; SAFETY PROMOTIONS; TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRIES;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; ARTICLE; FINLAND; HUMAN; INDUSTRIAL WORKER; JOB PERFORMANCE; METAL INDUSTRY; OCCUPATIONAL ACCIDENT; OCCUPATIONAL HAZARD; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; WORKPLACE;

EID: 43949112314     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.01.009     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (1991) 179-211
2. ALT, 2005. Autoliikenteen työnantajaliitto ("Employers' association in transportation industry") (in Finnish) (Referred 12.8.2005) .
3. Baram M. Shame, blame and liability: why safety management suffers organisational learning disabilities. In: Hale A., Wilpert B., and Freitag M. (Eds). After the Event From Accident to Organisational Learning (1997), Elsevier Science, Oxford 161-177
4. Bruseberg, A., Solodilova, I., Hourizi, R., Johnson, P., 2002. A framework for re-examining accident reports to support interaction design process. In: Johnson, C.W. (Ed.), Workshop on the Investigation and Reporting of Incidents and Accidents (IRIA 2002), Department of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, pp. 184-193.
5. BS8800, 2004. Occupational health and safety management systems - Guide, British Standards Institution, London.
6. Dyreborg, J., Mikkelsen, K.L., 2003. Evaluation of an accident investigation tool using a safety perception maturity scale. Safety Science Monitor 7, Article II-1 (Referred 10.2.2005). .
7. FAII, 2004. The finnish statutory accident insurance scheme. Federation of Accident Insurance Institutions, Helsinki (Referred 6.7.2004). .
8. FAII, 2006. Mikä on työpaikkaonnettomuuksien tutkintajärjestelmä? ("What is the system for Investigation of Fatal Workplace Accidents?") (in Finnish). Federation of Accident Insurance Institutions, Helsinki (Referred 15.2.2006). .
9. Harms-Ringdahl L. Relationships between accident investigations, risk analysis, and safety management. Journal of Hazardous Materials 111 (2004) 13-19
10. Hämäläinen, P., 2000. Occupational risk methods for traffic safety prevention, pre-study. In: Mondelo, P., Mattila, M., Karwowski, W. (Eds.). Proceedings of the First International Conference on Occupational Risk Prevention ORP2000, Tenerife, Spain, February 23-25, CD-ROM.
11. ILO-OSH, 2001. Guidelines on occupational safety and health management systems, International Labour Office, Geneva.
12. Johnson C.W. A first step towards the integration of accident reports and constructive design documents. In: Felici M., Kanoun K., and Pasquini A. (Eds). 18th International Conference on Computer Safety, Reliability and Security, Toulouse France (1999), Springer-Verlag 286-296 (September 27-29)
13. Johnson C.W. Proving properties of accidents. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 67 (2000) 175-191
14. Kim P.H. When what you know can hurt you: a study of experimental effects on group discussion and performance. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 69 (1997) 165-177
15. Kjellén U. Prevention of accidents through experience feedback (2000), Taylor & Francis, London
16. Leveson, N., 2001. Evaluating accident models using recent aerospace accidents (Part I: Event-Based Models). Software Engineering Research Laboratory, Aeronautics and Astronautics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Referred 9.11.2005). .
17. OHSAS 18002:fi, 2003. Occupational health and safety management systems. Guidelines for the implementation of OHSAS 18001, Finnish Standards Association SFS, Helsinki.
18. Pierro A., Mannetti L., Erb H.-P., Spiegel S., and Kruglanski A.W. Informational length and order of presentation as determinants of persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 41 (2005) 458-469
19. Rundmo T., and Hale A.R. Managers' attitudes towards safety and accident prevention. Safety Science 41 (2003) 557-574
20. Stubblefield C. Persuasive communication: marketing health promotion. Nursing Outlook 45 (1997) 173-177
21. Technology Industries of Finland, 2006. 2005 Year book (Referred 15.2.2006). .
22. US Department of Labor, 2005. Fatal facts accident reports. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, US Department of Labor (Referred 2.8.2005). .
23. Williamson A.M., Feyer A.-M., and Cairns D.R. Industry differences in accident causation. Safety Science 24 (1996) 1-12