Finding science in the school body: Reflections on transgressing the boundaries of science education and the social studies of science

Science Education

Volumn 92, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 389-403

  Weinstein, Matthew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 43849111842     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: 1098237X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sce.20267     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Achinstein, B., & Ogawa, R. T. (2006). (In)Fidelity: What the resistance of new teachers reveals about professional principles and prescriptive educational policies. Harvard Educational Review, 76(1), 30-63.
2. Anderson, B. (1994). Exodus. Critical Inquiry, 20(2), 314-327.
3. Baker, B. M., & Heyning, K. E. (2004). Dangerous coagulations?: The uses of Foucault in the study of education. New York: P. Lang.
4. Bakhtin, M. M. (1990). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
5. Barnes, B., & Edge, D. (Eds.). (1982). Science in context: Readings in the sociology of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Barton, A. C. (2003). Teaching science for social justice. New York: Teachers College Press.
7. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
8. Bencze, J. L., & Alsop, S. J. (2006, April). Teachers' and student-teachers' commitments to exposing students to the nature of profit-driven science. Paper presented at the AERA, San Francisco, CA.
9. Bourdieu, P. (1978). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1972)
10. Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Broadway, F., Qammar, H., Spickard-Prettyman, S., & Evans, E. (2005, Oct.). The use of reflective journals for student learning and development. Paper presented at the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education, Indianapolis, IN.
12. Callon, M. (1999). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In M. Biagioli (Ed.), The science studies reader. New York: Routledge.
13. Collins, H. M., & Pinch, T. J. (1998). The golem: What you should know about science (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
14. Davis-Floyd, R., & Dumit, J. (1998). Cyborg babies: From techno-sex to techno-tots. New York: Routledge.
15. Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. London: Routledge.
16. Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1982). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17. Downey, G. L., & Lucerna, J. C. (1997). Engineering selves: Hiring into a contested field of education. In G. L. Downey & J. Dumit (Eds.), Cyborgs and citadels: Anthropological interventions in emerging sciences and technologies (pp. 5-30). Santa Fe, NM: SAR Press.
18. Duckworth, E. (1986). Teaching as research. Harvard Educational Review, 56(4), 480-495.
19. Dumit, J. (1998). Biology is elsewhere: Cutting-edge evidence, new social movements and illnesses you have to fight to get. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Philadelphia, PA.
20. Dumit, J. (2006, November). Silent suffering and loud numbers: Mass clinical risk and prognostic sovereignty. Paper presented at the 4S Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
21. Eisenhart, M., & DeHaan, R. L. (2005). Doctoral preparation of scientifically based education researchers. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 3-13.
22. Eisenhart, M. A., & Finkel, E. (1998). Women's science: Learning and succeeding from the margins. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Environmental Inquiry. (2007). Environmental Inquiry-Publications. Retrieved October 22, 2007, from http://ei.cornell.edu/pubs/
24. Fortun, K. (1996, November). Environment, epidemiology, and the work of culture: Alternative strategies. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Anthropological Association, San Francisco, CA.
25. Fortun, K., & Fortun, M. (2005). Scientific imaginaries and ethical plateaus in contemporary U.S. toxicology. American Anthropologist, 107(1), 43-54.
26. Fujimura, J. H. (1992). Crafting science: Standardized packages, boundary objects, and "translation." In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Gershon, W. S. (2007, April). Studenting and curriculum at a good elementary school: A recipe for success. Paper presented at the AERA, Chicago, IL.
28. Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48, 781-795.
29. Gieryn, T.F. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Goodman, A. H., Heath, D., & Lindee, M. S. (2003). Genetic nature/culture: Anthropology and science beyond the two-culture divide. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31. Gough, N. (1992, April). Laboratories in schools: Material places, mythic spaces. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
32. Gough, N. (1993). Laboratories in fiction: Science education and popular media. Geelong, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University.
33. Gross, A. G. (1996). The rhetoric of science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
35. Haraway, D. J. (1989). Primate visions: Gender, race and nature in the world of modern science. New York: Routledge.
36. Haraway, D. J. (1991a). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In D. J. Haraway (Ed.), Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 149-182). New York: Routledge.
37. Haraway, D. J. (1991b). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In D. J. Haraway (Ed.), Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 183-201). New York: Routledge.
38. Haraway, D. J. (1994). A game of cat's cradle: Science studies, feminist theory, and cultural studies. Configurations, 2(1), 59-71.
39. Haraway, D. J. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouse™. New York: Routledge.
40. Heath, D. (1997). Bodies, antibodies, and modest interventions. In G. L. Downey & J. Dumit (Eds.), Cyborgs and citadels. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research.
41. Heath, D., Rapp, R., & Taussig, K.-S. (2000, November). Mapping webs of genetic engagement. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Anthropological Association, San Francisco, CA.
42. Helms, J. V. (1995, April). Teaching science as a social problem. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
43. Hess, D., Breyman, S., Campbell, N., & Martin, B. (2007). Science, technology, and social movements. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44. Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodríguez, A. B., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). "Doing the lesson" or "doing science": Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757-792.
45. Kaiser, D. (2005). Pedagogy and the practice of science: Historical and contemporary perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Kelly, G. J., Carlsen, W. S., & Cunningham, C. M. (1993). Science education in sociocultural context: Perspectives from the sociology of science. Science Education, 77(2), 207-220.
47. Kliebard, H. M. (1986). The struggle for the American curriculum: 1893-1958. New York: Routledge.
48. Kuhn, T. S. (1970a). The function of dogma in scientific research. In B. A. Brody (Ed.), Readings in the philosophy of science (pp. 356-373). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
49. Kuhn, T. S. (1970b). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed., Vols. I and II). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50. Lather, P. (2003, April). This IS your father's paradigm. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
51. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1979)
54. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
55. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
56. Litt, J. S. (2000). Medicalized motherhood: Perspectives from the lives of African-American and Jewish women. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
57. Little, M. (2003). "Better than numbers ... ": A gentle critique of evidence based medicine. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 73(4), 177-182.
58. Lugones, M. (1990). Playfulness, "world"-traveling, and loving perception. In G. Anzaldúa (Ed.), Making face, making soul, haciendo caras: Creative and critical perspectives by women of color. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Foundation Books.
59. Martin, E. (1994). Flexible bodies: Tracking immunity in American culture - From the days of polio to the age of AIDS. Boston: Beacon Press.
60. Megil, A. (Ed.). (1994). Rethinking objectivity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
61. Montgomery, S. L. ( 1994). Minds for the making: The role of science in American education, 1750-1990. New York: Guilford.
62. National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
63. Peterson, N. S., & Jungck, J. R. (1988, March-April). Problem-posing, problem-solving and persuasion in biology education. Academic Computing, 14-50.
64. Petryna, A., Lakoff, A., & Kleinman, A. (2006). Global pharmaceuticals: Ethics, markets, practices. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
65. Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, & science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
66. Roth, W.-M. (1995). Knowing and interacting: A study of culture, practices, and resources in a grade 8 open-inquiry science classroom guided by a cognitive apprenticeship metaphor. Cognition and Instruction, 13(1), 73-128.
67. Roth, W.-M., & Désautels, J. (2002). Science education as/for sociopolitical action. New York: Peter Lang.
68. Rouse, J. (1993). What are cultural studies of scientific knowledge. Configurations, 1(1), 1-22.
69. Rudolph, J. L. (2002). Scientists in the classroom: The cold war reconstruction of American science education (1st ed.). New York: Palgrave.
70. Schiebinger, L. (1993). Nature's body: Gender in the making of modern science. Boston: Beacon Press.
71. Sismondo, S. (2008). Science and technology studies and an engaged program. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
72. Solomon, J. & Aikenhead, G. (Eds.). (1994). STS education: International perspectives on reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
73. Spickard-Prettyman, S., Qammar, H., Evans, E., & Broadway, F. (2005, June). Engineering change for women in engineering: The role of curricular and instructional change. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Conference, Portland, OR. Star, S. L. (1991). Power, technologies and the phenomenology of conventions: On being allergic to onions. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters (pp. 26-56). London: Routledge.
74. Stone, A. R. (1995). The war of desire and technology at the close of the mechanical age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
75. Sunder Rajan, K. (2006). Biocapital: The constitution of postgenomic life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
76. Susskind, Y., & Finkel, E. A. (1995, April). Encouraging the socially responsible use of science: Examples of curricular reform. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
77. Tonso, K. L. (2006, November). Theorizing identity in engineering learning settings: A sociocultural take. Paper presented at the 4S Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
78. Toumey, C. P. (1996). Conjuring science: Scientific symbols and cultural meanings in American life. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
79. Trautmann, N. M., Carlsen, W. S., Krasny, M. E., Cunningham, C. M., Carroll, P., Guadangno, J., et al. (2001). Assessing toxic risk. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
80. Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
81. Turner, S., & Lullenger, K. (1999). Kuhn in the classroom, Lakatos in the lab: Science educators confront the nature-of-science debate. Science, Technology and Human Values, 24(1), 5-30.
82. Wallace, C. S. (2004). Framing new research in science literacy and language use: Authenticity, multiple discourses, and the "third space." Science Education, 88(6), 901-914.
83. Warwick, A., & Kaiser, D. (2005). Kuhn, Foucault, and the power of pedagogy. In D. Kaiser (Ed.), Pedagogy and the practice of science: Historical and contemporary perspectives (pp. 393-410). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
84. Watson, J. D., & Stent, G. S. (1998). The double helix: A personal account of the discovery of the structure of DNA (1st Scribner ed.). New York: Scribner.
85. Weaver, J. A., Anijar, K., & Daspit, T. (2004). Science fiction curriculum, cyborg teachers, & youth culture(s) (Vol. 158). New York: Peter Lang.
86. Weinstein, M. (1997, June). Towards a critical anthropology of science and education. Paper presented at the Committee on the Anthropology of Science, Technology, and Computing, Troy, NY.
87. Weinstein, M. (2002, April). Illness and power: Analyzing ideology in the representation of disease in science education. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
88. Weinstein, M. (2003, April). Out of control: Cancer as a representation and allegory in life health and science textbooks. Paper presented at the AERA, Chicago, IL.
89. Weinstein, M. (2004a). Reversing the objective: Adding guinea pig pedagogies. Science Education, 88(2), 248-262.
90. Weinstein, M. (2004b). Science/education. In J. A. Weaver, K. Anijar, & T. Daspit (Eds.), Science fiction curriculum, cyborg teachers, & youth culture(s). New York: Peter Lang.
91. Weinstein, M. (2004c). Within us, against us: Seeking a thirdspace through fiction in the science curriculum. Paper presented at the NARST, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
92. Weinstein, M. (2006). Slash writers and guinea pigs as models for a scientific multiliteracy. Educational Theory and Philosophy, 38(5), 583-599.
93. Yager, R. E. (Ed.). (1996). Science/technology/society as reform in science education. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.