Framing new research in science literacy and language use: Authenticity, multiple discourses, and the "third space"

Science Education

Volumn 88, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 901-914

  Wallace, Carolyn S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 9344251628     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sce.20024     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Ballenger, C. (1997). Social identities, moral narratives, scientific argumentation: Science talk in a bilingual classroom. Language and Education, 11(1), 1-14.
2. Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.
3. Brown, A. L., & Palinscar, A. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction (pp. 393-451). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245-282.
5. Dewey, J. (1902). The child and the curriculum. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
6. Doyle, W. (2000, April). Authenticity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
7. Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312.
8. Edmonson, K. M, & Novak, J. D. (1993). The interplay of scientific epistemological views, learning strategies, and attitudes of college students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 547-559.
9. Gee, J. P. (2001, August). Language in the science classroom: Academic social languages as the heart of school based literacy. Paper presented at the meeting, Crossing Borders: Connecting Science and Literacy, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
10. Gee, J. P. (2002). Playing the game: Language and learning science. Available: http://www.educ.uvic.ca/faculty/lyore/sciencelanguage.
11. Goldman, S. R., & Wiley, J., (2002, September). Science Literacy: The centrality of critical reading. Paper presented at the conference, "Foundations for language and scientific literacy research: Philosophical, psychological, linguistic, and cultural," Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
12. Gutierrez, K., Baquedo-López, P., Tejeda, C., & Rivera, A. (1999, April). Hybridity as a tool for understanding literacy learning: Building on the syncretic approach. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
13. Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
14. Hand, B. M., Alvermann, D. E., Gee, J., Guzzetti, B. J., St. Norris, P., Phillips, L. M., Prain, V., & Yore, L. D. (2003). Guest editorial: Message from the "Island Group": What is literacy in science literacy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 607-692.
15. Hand, B., Prain, V., Lawrence, C., & Yore, L. D. (1999). A writing in science framework designed to enhance scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 1021-1035.
16. Hand, B., Wallace, C. S., & Yang, E. M. (2004). Using the science writing heuristic to enhance learning outcomes from laboratory activities in seventh grade science: Quantitative and qualitative aspects. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 131-149.
17. Holliday, W. G., Yore, L. D., & Alvermann, D. E. (1994). The reading-science learning-writing connection: Breakthroughs, barriers, and promises. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 877-894.
18. Keys, C. W. (1999). Revitalizing instruction in scientific genres: Connecting knowledge production with writing to learn in science. Science Education, 83, 115-130.
19. Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77, 319-337.
20. Moje, B. E., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., & Marx, W. R. (2001). "Maestro, what is quality?": Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 469-498.
21. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
22. Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87, 224-240.
23. Osborne, R., & Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in science: The implications of children's science. Auckland, NZ: Heinemann.
24. Osborne, R., & Wittrock, M. (1983). Learning science: A generative process. Science Education, 67, 489-508.
25. Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 220-227.
26. Prain, V., & Hand, B. (1996). Writing for learning in secondary sciences: Rethinking practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12, 609-626.
27. Tsai, C.-C. (1999). "Laboratory exercises help me memorize the scientific truths": A study of eight graders' scientific epistemological views and learning in laboratory activities. Science Education, 83, 654-674.
28. Wallace, C. S. (2004). An illumination of the roles of hands-on activities, discussion, text reading, and writing in constructing biology knowledge in seventh grade. School Science and Mathematics, 104(2), 1-9.
29. Wallace, C. S., & Narayan, R. (2002, September). Acquiring the social language of science: Building science language identities through inquiry-based investigations. Paper presented at the conference, "Foundations for language and scientific literacy research: Philosophical, psychological, linguistic, and cultural," Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
30. Wallace, C. S., Tsoi, M. Y., Calkin, J., & Darley, W. M. (2003). Learning from inquiry-based laboratories in nonmajor biology: An interpretive study of the relationships among inquiry experience, epistemologies, and conceptual growth. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 986-1024.