Parametric induction of animacy experience

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 425-437

  Santos, Natacha S ^a   David, Nicole ^a,b   Bente, Gary ^a   Vogeley, Kai ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^c FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Animacy; Biological motion; Intentionality; Mentalizing; Motion perception; Social cognition; Theory of mind

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANIMACY; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINEMATICS; MALE; MOTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SOCIAL COGNITION; THEORY OF MIND; VIRTUAL REALITY;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; COGNITION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 43849092173     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.012     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Abell F., Happe F., and Frith U. Do triangles play tricks? Attribution of mental states to animated shapes in normal and abnormal development. Cognitive Development 15 (2000) 1-16
2. Allison T., Puce A., and McCarthy G. Social perception from visual cues: Role of the sts region. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 7 (2000) 267-278
3. Atran S. Folk biology and the anthropology of science: Cognitive universals and cultural particulars. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 4 (1998) 547-569 discussion 569-609
4. Baron-Cohen S. How to build a baby that can read minds: Cognitive mechanisms in mind reading. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition 13 (1994) 1-40
5. Baron-Cohen S., Leslie A.M., and Frith U. Does the autistic child have a "theory of mind"?. Cognition 21 1 (1985) 37-46
6. Barrett H., Todd P., Miller F., and Blythe M. Accurate judgments of intention from motion cues alone: A cross-cultural study. Evolution and Human Behavior 26 (2005) 313-331
7. Bassili J.N. Temporal and spatial contingencies in the perception of social events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 33 6 (1976) 680-685
8. Bentall R.P., Corcoran R., Howard R., Blackwood N., and Kinderman P. Persecutory delusions: A review and theoretical integration. Clinical Psychology Review 21 8 (2001) 1143-1192
9. Bente G., Feist A., and Elder S. Person perception effects of computer simulated male and female head movement. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 20 (1996) 213-228
10. Bente, G., & Krämer, N. C. (2002). Virtuelle Realität als Gegenstand und Methode in der Psychologie. In G. Bente, N. C. Krämer, & A. Petersen (Hrsg.), Virtuelle Realitäten (S. 1-31). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
11. Bente G., Krämer N.C., Peterson A., and Ruiter J.P. Computer animated movement and person perception. Methodological advances in nonverbal behavior research. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 25 3 (2001) 151-166
12. Bente G., Petersen A., Kramer N.C., and de Ruiter J.P. Transcript-based computer animation of movement: Evaluating a new tool for nonverbal behavior research. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers 33 3 (2001) 303-310
13. Berry D.S., Misovich S.J., Kean K.J., and Baron R.M. Effects of disruption of structure and motion on perceptions of social causality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 18 2 (1992) 237-244
14. Blackwood N.J., Howard R.J., Bentall R.P., and Murray R.M. Cognitive neuropsychiatric models of persecutory delusions. American Journal of Psychiatry 158 4 (2001) 527-539
15. Blake R., and Shiffrar M. Perception of human motion. Annual Review of Psychology 58 (2007) 47-73
16. Blakemore S.J., Boyer P., Pachot-Clouard M., Meltzoff A., Segebarth C., and Decety J. The detection of contingency and animacy from simple animations in the human brain. Cerebral Cortex 13 8 (2003) 837-844
17. Blakemore S.J., Fonlupt P., Pachot-Clouard M., Darmon C., Boyer P., Meltzoff A.N., et al. How the brain perceives causality: An event-related fmri study. Neuroreport 12 17 (2001) 3741-3746
18. Bloom P., and Veres C. The perceived intentionality of groups. Cognition 71 1 (1999) B1-B9
19. Blythe P.W., Miller G.F., and Todd P.M. Human simulation of adaptive behavior: Interactive studies of pursuit, evasion, courtship, fighting, and play. In: Maes P., Mataric M.J., Meyer J.-A., Pollack J., and Wilson S.W. (Eds). From animals to animats 4: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on simulating adaptive behavior (1996), The MIT Press, Cambridge 13-22
20. Boyatzis C.J., and Satyaprasad C. Children's facial and gestural decoding and encoding: Relations between skills and with popularity. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 18 1 (1994) 37-55
21. Braver T.S., Cohen J.D., Nystrom L.E., Jonides J., Smith E.E., and Noll D.C. A parametric study of prefrontal cortex involvement in human working memory. Neuroimage 5 (1997) 49-62
22. Broks P. Brain, self, and others: The neuropsychology of social cognition. In: Claridge G. (Ed). Schizotypy: Implications for illness and health (1997), Oxford University Press
23. Burns J. The social brain hypothesis of schizophrenia. World Psychiatry 5 2 (2006) 77-81
24. Castelli F., Happe F., Frith U., and Frith C. Movement and mind: A functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns. Neuroimage 12 3 (2000) 314-325
25. Coleridge, T. S. (1817). Biographia Literaria (Republikation: 1908. London: Dent).
26. Csibra G. Goal attribution to inanimate agents by 6.5-month-old infants. Cognition 107 2 (2008) 705-717
27. Csibra G., Gergely G., Biro S., Koos O., and Brockbank M. Goal attribution without agency cues: The perception of 'pure reason' in infancy. Cognition 72 3 (1999) 237-267
28. Dasser V., Ulbaek I., and Premack D. The perception of intention. Science 243 4889 (1989) 365-367
29. Dittrich W.H., and Lea S.E. Visual perception of intentional motion. Perception 23 3 (1994) 253-268
30. Emery N.J. The eyes have it: The neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 24 6 (2000) 581-604
31. Farroni T., Csibra G., Simion F., and Johnson M.H. Eye contact detection in humans from birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99 14 (2002) 9602-9605
32. Frith C.D. Schizophrenia and theory of mind. Psychological Medicine 34 3 (2004) 385-389
33. Frith U. Emanuel miller lecture: Confusions and controversies about asperger syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 45 4 (2004) 672-686
34. Frith C.D., Friston K.J., Liddle P.F., and Frackowiak R.S. Pet imaging and cognition in schizophrenia. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 85 4 (1992) 222-224
35. Gelman R., Durgin F., and Kaufman L. Distinguishing between animates and inanimates: Not by motion alone. In: Dan Sperber D.P., and Premack A.J. (Eds). Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (1995), Clarendon Press, Oxford 150-184
36. Gergely G., and Csibra G. Teleological reasoning in infancy: The naive theory of rational action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 7 (2003) 287-292
37. Gergely G., Nadasdy Z., Csibra G., and Biro S. Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition 56 2 (1995) 165-193
38. Gibson J.J. The ecological approach to visual perception (1979), Houghton Mifflin, Boston [Currently published by Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ]
39. Gray H.M., Gray K., and Wegner D.M. Dimensions of mind perception. Science 315 5812 (2007) 619
40. Gyulai E. Considerations on perception of "animacy" in the motion of a single object. Perceptual and Motor Skills 99 3 Pt 1 (2004) 1014-1026
41. Heider F., and Simmel M. An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology 57 (1944) 243-249
42. Hirai M., and Hiraki K. An event-related potentials study of biological motion perception in human infants. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research 22 2 (2005) 301-304
43. Johansson G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics 14 (1973) 201-211
44. Johansson G. Spatio-temporal differentiation and integration in visual motion perception. An experimental and theoretical analysis of calculus-like functions in visual data processing. Psychological Research 38 4 (1976) 379-393
45. Johnson S.C. Detecting agents. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 358 1431 (2003) 549-559
46. Johnson S.C., Booth A., and O'Hearn K. Inferring the goals of a nonhuman agent. Cognitive Development 16 (2001) 637-656
47. Kleiner, K. A. (1988). Infants' recognition of facial expressions from partial features of the face. Annual meeting of the American psychological association, Atlanta, USA.
48. Langdon R., and Coltheart M. Mentalising, schizotypy, and schizophrenia. Cognition 71 1 (1999) 43-71
49. Leslie A.M. Spatiotemporal continuity and the perception of causality in infants. Perception 13 3 (1984) 287-305
50. Leslie A.M. Tomm, toby, and agency: Core architecture and domain specificity. In: Hirschfeld L.A., and Gelman S.A. (Eds). Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (1994), Cambridge University Press 119-148
51. Luo Y., and Baillargeon R. Can a self-propelled box have a goal? Psychological reasoning in 5-month-old infants. Psychological Science 16 8 (2005) 601-608
52. Mar R.A., and Macrae C.N. Triggering the intentional stance. Novartis Foundation Symposium 278 (2007) 111-120 discussion 120-133, 216-121
53. Michotte A. La perception de la causalite, etudes psychologiques vi (1946), Institut superieur de philosophie, Louvain, France
54. Minguzzi G.F. Caratteri espressivi ed intenzionali dei movimenti: "la percezione dell'attesa". Rivista di Psicologia 55 3 (1961) 157-173
55. Morewedge C.K., Preston J., and Wegner D.M. Timescale bias in the attribution of mind. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93 1 (2007) 1-11
56. Opfer J.E. Identifying living and sentient kinds from dynamic information: The case of goal-directed versus aimless autonomous movement in conceptual change. Cognition 86 2 (2002) 97-122
57. Premack D. The infant's theory of self-propelled objects. Cognition 36 1 (1990) 1-16
58. Premack D.P.A.J. Intention as psychological cause. In: Sperber D.P.D., and Premack A.J. (Eds). Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (1995), Oxford University Press, Oxford 44-77
59. Rakison D.H., and Poulin-Dubois D. Developmental origin of the animate-inanimate distinction. Psychological Bulletin 127 2 (2001) 209-228
60. Reid V.M., Hoehl S., and Striano T. The perception of biological motion by infants: An event-related potential study. Neuroscience Letters 395 3 (2006) 211-214
61. Rimé B., Boulanger B., Laubin P., Richir M., and Stroobants K. The perception of interpersonal emotions originated by patterns of movement. Motivation and Emotion 9 (1985) 241-260
62. Rochat P., Morgan R., and Carpenter M. Young infants' sensitivity to movement information specifying social causality. Cognitive Development 12 (1997) 537-561
63. Scaife M., and Bruner J.S. The capacity for joint visual attention in the infant. Nature 253 5489 (1975) 265-266
64. Schlottmann A., and Surian L. Do 9-month-olds perceive causation-at-a-distance?. Perception 28 9 (1999) 1105-1113
65. Scholl B.J., and Tremoulet P.D. Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 8 (2000) 299-309
66. Schultz J., Friston K.J., O'Doherty J., Wolpert D.M., and Frith C.D. Activation in posterior superior temporal sulcus parallels parameter inducing the percept of animacy. Neuron 45 4 (2005) 625-635
67. Springer K., Meier J.A., and Berry D.S. Nonverbal bases of social perception: Developmental change in sensitivity to patterns of motion that reveal interpersonal events. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 20 4 (1996) 199-211
68. Sternberg S. The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donder's method. Acta Psychologica 30 (1969) 276-315
69. Stewart, J. A. (1982). Perception of animacy. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvannia.
70. Stewart, J. A. (1984). Object motion and the perception of animacy. Paper presented at the psychonomic society meeting, San Antonio.
71. Szego P.A., and Rutherford M.D. Life is not just in the fast lane: Dissociating the perceptions of speed and animacy. Journal of Vision 7 9 (2007) 480a
72. Tremoulet P.D., and Feldman J. Perception of animacy from the motion of a single object. Perception 29 8 (2000) 943-951
73. Tremoulet P.D., and Feldman J. The influence of spatial context and the role of intentionality in the interpretation of animacy from motion. Perception & Psychophysics 68 6 (2006) 1047-1058
74. Tronick E., Als H., Adamson L., Wise S., and Brazelton T.B. The infant's response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face-to-face interaction. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry 17 1 (1978) 1-13