How dynamic is interhemispheric interaction? Effects of task switching on the across-hemisphere advantage

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 69-75

  Welcome, Suzanne E ^a   Chiarello, Christine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Corpus callosum; Task complexity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CORPUS CALLOSUM; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERHEMISPHERIC INTERACTION; LEFT HANDEDNESS; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS CONTROL; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL FIELD;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; CEREBRUM; CORPUS CALLOSUM; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; REACTION TIME; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 43649106657     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Banich M. The missing link: the role of interhemispheric interaction in attentional processing. Brain and Cognition 36 (1998) 128-157
2. Banich M., and Shenker. Investigations of interhemispheric processing: methodological considerations. Neuropsychology 8 (1994) 263-277
3. Banich M.T., and Nicholas C.D. Integration of reading processing between the hemispheres. In: Beeman M., and Chiarello C. (Eds). Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience (1998), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ 51-77
4. Belger A., and Banich M.T. Costs and benefits of integrating information between the cerebral hemispheres: a computational perspective. Neuropyschology 12 3 (1998) 380-398
5. Braver T.S., Cohen J.D., Nystrom L.E., Jonides J., Smith E.E., and Noll D.C. A parametric study of prefrontal cortex involvement in human working memory. NeuroImage 5 (1997) 49-62
6. Bryden M.P. Laterality: Functional asymmetry in the normal brain (1982), Academic Press, New York
7. Cherbuin N., and Brinkman C. Practice makes two hemispheres almost perfect. Cognitive Brain Research 24 3 (2005) 413-422
8. Cohen J.D., MacWhinney B., Flatt M., and Provost J. PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 25 (1993) 257-271
9. Klingberg T., O'Sullivan B.T., and Roland P.E. Bilateral activation of fronto-parietal networks by incrementing demand in a working memory task. Cerebral Cortex 7 (1997) 465-471
10. Koivisto M. Interhemispheric interaction in semantic categorization of pictures. Cognitive Brain Research 9 1 (2000) 45-51
11. Liederman J., Merola J., and Martinez S. Interhemispheric collaboration in response to simultaneous bilateral input. Neuropsychologia 23 5 (1985) 673-683
12. Maertens M., and Pollmann S. Interhemispheric resource sharing: Decreasing benefit with increasing processing efficiency. Brain and Cognition 58 2 (2005) 183-192
13. Pollmann S., Zaidel E., and Cramon D.Y. The neural basis of the bilateral distribution advantage. Experimental Brain Research 153 3 (2003) 322-333
14. Reuter-Lorenz P.A., Stanczak L., and Miller A.C. Neural recruitment and cognitive aging: Two hemispheres are better than one, especially as you age. Psychological Science 10 6 (1999) 494-500
15. Schneider W., and Shiffrin R.M. Controlled and automatic human information processing: 1. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review 84 (1977) 1-66
16. Weissman D.H., and Banich M.T. The cerebral hemispheres cooperate to perform complex but not simple tasks. Neuropsychology 14 1 (2000) 41-59
17. Weissman D.H., and Compton R.J. Practice makes a hemisphere perfect: The advantage of interhemispheric recruitment is eliminated with practice. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain, and Cognition 8 4 (2003) 361-375
18. Yazgan M.Y., Wexler B.E., Kinsbourne M., Peterson B., and Leckman J.F. Functional significance of individual variations in callosal area. Neuropsychologia 33 6 (1995) 769-779