Practice makes a hemisphere perfect: The advantage of interhemispheric recruitment is eliminated with practice

Laterality

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 361-375

  Weissman, Daniel H ^a   Compton, Rebecca J ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HAVERFORD COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; EXPERIMENTATION; HEMISPHERE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; LEARNING; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PREDICTION; PUBLISHING; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0142185031     PISSN: 1357650X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13576500412331325442     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Awh, E., Smith, E. E., & Jonides, J. (1995). Human rehearsal processes and the frontal lobes: PET evidence. In J. Grafman & K.J. Holyoak (Eds.), Structure and Functions of the Human Prefrontal Cortex. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 769, 97-117.
2. Banich, M. T. (1998). The missing link: The role of interhemispheric interaction in attentional processing. Brain and Cognition, 36, 128-157.
3. Banich, M. T., & Belger, A. (1990). Interhemispheric interaction: How do the hemispheres divide and conquer a task? Cortex, 26, 77-94.
4. Banich, M. T., & Shenker, J. I. (1994). Investigations of interhemispheric processing: Methodological considerations. Neuropsychology, 8(2), 263-277.
5. Belger, A., & Banich, M. T. (1998). Costs and benefits of integrating information between the cerebral hemispheres: A computational perspective. Neuropsychology, 12(3), 380-398.
6. Braver, T. S., Cohen, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Jonides, J., Smith, E. E., & Noll, D. C. (1997). A parametric study of prefrontal cortex involvement in human working memory. Neuroimage, 5, 49-62.
7. Bush, G., Whalen, P., Rosen, B. R., Jenike, M. A., McInerney, S. C., & Rauch, S. L. (1998). The counting Stroop: An interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging - Validation study with functional MRI. Human Brain Mapping, 6, 270-282.
8. Carpeter, P. A., Just, M. A., Keller, T. A., Eddy, W., & Thulborn, K. (1999). Graded functional activation in the visuospatial system with the amount of task demand. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 9-24.
9. Chiarello, C., & Maxfield, L. (1996). Varieties of interhemispheric inhibition, or how to keep a good hemisphere down. Brain and Cognition, 30, 81-108.
10. Cronin-Golomb, A., Gabrieli, J. D. E, & Keane, M. M. (1996). Implicit and explicit memory retrieval within and across the disconnected cerebral hemispheres. Neuropsychology, 10(2), 254-262.
11. Just, M. .A., Carpenter, P. A., Keller, T. A., Eddy, W. F., & Thulborn, K. R. (1996). Brain activation modulated by sentence comprehension. Science, 274(5284), 114-116.
12. Kassubek, J., Schmidtke, K., Kimmig, H., Lücking, C. H., & Greenlee, M. W. (2001). Changes in cortical activation during mirror reading before and after training: An fMRI study of procedural learning. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 207-217.
13. Kimchi, R. (1988). Selective attention to global and local levels in the comparison of hierarchical patterns. Perception and Psychophysics, 43, 189-198.
14. Klingberg, T., O'Sullivan, B. T., & Roland, P. E. (1997). Bilateral activation of fronto-parietal networks by incrementing demand in a working memory task. Cerebral Cortex, 7(5), 465-471.
15. Liederman, J., Merola, J., & Martinez, S. (1985). Interhemispheric collaboration in response to simultaneous bilateral input. Neuropsychologia, 23(5), 673-683.
16. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95(4), 492-527.
17. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163-203.
18. Merola, J. L., & Liederman, J. (1990). The effect of task difficulty upon the extent to which performance benefits from between-hemisphere division of inputs. Journal of Neuroscience, 51, 35-44.
19. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
20. Norman, W. D., Jeeves, M. A., Milne, A., & Ludwig, T. (1992). Hemispheric interactions: The bilateral advantage and task difficulty. Cortex, 28, 623-642.
21. Peterson, K. M., Elfgren, C., & Ingvar, M. (1999). Dynamic changes in the functional anatomy of the human brain during recall of abstract designs related to practice. Neuropsychologia, 37, 567-587.
22. Petrides, M., Alivisatos, B., Meyer, E., & Evans, A. C. (1993). Functional activation of the human frontal cortex during the performance of verbal working memory tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 90, 878-882.
23. Pollmann, S., & Zaidel, E. (2001). fMRI evidence for interhemispheric resources sharing in complex tasks. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, v. 27, Program No. 10.3.
24. Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., Jonides, J., Smith, E. E., Hartley, A., Miller, A., Marshuetz, C., et al. (2000). Age differences in the frontal lateralization of verbal and spatial working memory revealed by PET. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(1), 174-187.
25. Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., Stanczak, L., & Miller, A. C. (1999). Neural recruitment and cognitive aging: Two hemispheres are better than one, especially as you age. Psychological Science, 10(6), 494-500.
26. Robertson, L. C., Lamb, M. R., & Zaidel, E. (1993). Interhemispheric relations in processing hierarchical patterns: Evidence from normal and commissurotomized subjects. Neuropsychology, 7, 325-342.
27. Ruthruff, E., Johnston, J. C., & Van Selst, M. (2001). Why practice reduces dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(1), 3-21.
28. Scalf, P. E., Banich, M. T., Narechania, K., & Liebler, C. (2001). Results from the attentional blink demonstrate that the benefits of parallel processing by the cerebral hemispheres vary with visual attention demands [abstract]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience Supplement, 149.
29. Schacter, D. L., & Buckner, R. L. (1998). Priming and the brain. Neuron, 20, 185-195.
30. Smith, E. E., Jonides, J., & Koeppe, R. A. (1996). Dissociating verbal and spatial working memory using PET. Cerebral Cortex, 6(1), 11-20.
31. Sohn, Y.-S., Liederman, J,. & Reinitz, M. T. (1996). Division of inputs between hemispheres eliminates illusory conjunctions. Neuropsychologia, 34(11), 1057-1068.
32. Van Selst, M., Ruthruff, E., & Johnston, J. C. (1999). Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(5), 1268-1283.
33. Weissman, D. H., & Banich, M. T. (1999). Global-local interference modulated by communication between the hemispheres. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(3), 283-308.
34. Weissman, D. H., & Banich, M. T. (2000). The cerebral hemispheres cooperate to perform complex but not simple tasks. Neuropsychology, 14(1), 41-59.
35. Weissman, D. H., Banich, M. T., & Puente, E. (2000). An unbalanced distribution of inputs across the hemispheres facilitates interhemispheric interaction. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6. 313-321.