The neural basis of the bilateral distribution advantage

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 153, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 322-333

  Pollmann, Stefan ^a,b   Zaidel, Eran ^c   Von Cramon, D Yves ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bilateral distribution advantage; fMRI; Human; Visual

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CINGULATE GYRUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL FIELD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; CORPUS CALLOSUM; CUES; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; GYRUS CINGULI; HUMANS; MALE; NERVE NET; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; TEMPORAL LOBE; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 0345304437     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1551-0     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Banich MT (1998) The missing link: the role of interhemispheric interaction in attentional processing. Brain Cogn 36:128-157
2. Banich MT, Belger A (1990) Interhemispheric interaction: how do the hemispheres divide and conquer a task? Cortex 26:77-94
3. Belger A, Banich MT (1992) Interhemispheric interaction affected by computational complexity. Neuropsychologia 30:923-931
4. Belger A, Banich MT (1998) Costs and benefits of integrating information between the cerebral hemispheres: a computational perspective. Neuropsychology 12:380-398
5. Bosch V (2000) Statistical analysis of multi-subject fMRI data: assessment of focal activations. J Magnet Reson Imag 11:61-64
6. Buckner R, Petersen S, Ojemann J, Miezin F, Squire L, Raichle M (1995) Functional anatomical studies of explicit and implicit memory retrieval tasks. J Neurosci 15:12-29
7. Buckner R, Koutstaal W, Schacter D, Dale A, Rotte M, Rosen B (1998) Functional-anatomic study of episodic retrieval: II. Selective averaging of event-related fMRI trials to test the retrieval success hypothesis. Neuroimage 7:163-175
8. Castiello U, Umilta C (1992) Splitting focal attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18:837-848
9. Copeland SA (1995) Interhemispheric interaction in the normal brain: comparisons within and between the hemispheres. PhD dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of California at Los Angeles
10. Copeland SA, Zaidel E (1996) Contributions to the bilateral distribution advantage. J Intl Neuropsychol Soc 2:29
11. Corbetta M, Miezin FM, Shulman GL, Petersen SE (1991) Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography. J Neurosci 11:2383-2402
12. Eviatar Z, Zaidel E (1994) Letter matching within and between the disconnected hemispheres. Brain Cogn 25:128-137
13. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Worsley KJ, Poline JB, Frith CD, Frackowiak RSJ (1995) Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Hum Brain Mapp 2:189-210
14. Friston KJ, Williams S, Howard R, Frackowiak RSJ, Turner R (1996) Movement-related effects in fMRI time-series. Magnet Reson Imag 35:346-355
15. Friston KJ, Zarahn E, Josephs O, Henson RNA, Dale AM (1999) Stochastic designs in event-related fMRI. Neuroimage 10:607-619
16. Heilman KM, Valenstein E (1979) Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect. Ann Neurol 5:166-170
17. Hopfinger JB, Buonocore MH, Mangun GR (2000) The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control. Nat Neurosci 3:284-291
18. Josephs O, Henson RN (1999) Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging: modelling, inference and optimization. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 354:1215-1228
19. Loftus GR, Massen MEJ (1994) Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychon Bull Rev 1:476-490
20. Lohmann G, Mueller K, Bosch V, Mentzel H, Hessler S, Chen L, von Cramon DY (2001) Lipsia - a new software system for the evaluation of functional magnetic resonance images of the human brain. Comput Med Imaging Graph 25:449-457
21. McCormick PA, Klein RM, Johnston S (1998) Splitting versus sharing focal attention: comment on Castiello and Umilta (1992). J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:350-357
22. Mecklinger A, Bosch V, Gruenewald C, Bentin S, von Cramon DY (2000) What have Klingon letters and faces in common? An fMRI study on content-specific working memory systems. Hum Brain Mapp 11:146-161
23. Mesulam MM (1981) A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Ann Neurol 28:597-613
24. Morris R, Pandya DN, Petrides M (1999a) Fiber system linking the mid-dorsolateral frontal cortex with the retrosplenial/presubicular region in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol 407:183-192
25. Morris R, Petrides M, Pandya DN (1999b) Architecture and connections of retrosplenial area 30 in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Eur J Neurosci 11:2506-2518
26. Nobre AC, Sebestyen GN, Gitelman DR, Mesulam MM, Frackowiak RS, Frith CD (1997) Functional localization of the system for visuospatial attention using positron emission tomography. Brain 120:515-533
27. OGrady RB, Mueller HJ (2000) Object-based selection operates on a grouped array of locations. Percept Psychophys 62:1655-1667
28. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97-113
29. Polk T, Farah M (2002) Functional MRI evidence for an abstract, not perceptual, word-form area. J Exp Psychol Gen 131:65-72
30. Pollmann S, Dove A, von Cramon DY, Wiggins CJ (2000a) Event-related fMRI: comparison of conditions with varying BOLD-overlap. Hum Brain Mapp 9:26-37
31. Pollmann S, Weidner R, Müller HJ, von Cramon DY (2000b) A fronto-posterior network involved in visual dimension changes. J Cognit Neurosci 12:480-494
32. Posner MI (1969) Abstraction and the process of recognition. In: Bower GH (ed) The psychology of learning and motivation, III. Academic, New York
33. Puce A, Allison T, Asgari M, Gore JC, McCarthy G (1996) Differential sensitivity of human visual cortex to faces, letterstrings and textures: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci 16:5205-5215
34. Simon O, Mangin JF, Cohen L, Le Bihan D, Dehaene S (2002) Topographical layout of hand, eye, calculation, and language-related areas in the human parietal lobe. Neuron 33:475-487
35. Squire L, Ojemann J, Miezin F, Petersen S, Videen T, Raichle M (1992) Activation of the hippocampus in normal humans: a functional anatomical study of memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89:1837-1841
36. Talairach J, Tournoux P (1988) Co-planar stereotactic atlas of the human brain. Thieme, Stuttgart
37. Weidner R, Pollmann S, Müller HJ, von Cramon DY (2002) Top-down controlled visual dimension weighting: an event-related fMRI study. Cereb Cortex 12:318-328
38. Weissman DH, Banich MT (2000) The cerebral hemispheres cooperate to perform complex but not simple tasks. Neuropsychology 14:41-59
39. Weissman DH, Banich MT, Puente EI (2000) An unbalanced distribution of inputs across the hemispheres facilitates interhemispheric interaction. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 6:313-321
40. Wojciulik E, Kanwisher N (1998) The generality of parietal involvement in visual attention. Neuron 23:747-764