The missing link: The role of interhemispheric interaction in attentional processing

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 128-157

  Banich, Marie T ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; CORPUS CALLOSUM; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0032033710     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/brcg.1997.0950     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Adams J. H., Doyle D., Ford I., Gennarelli T. A., Graham D. I., McLellan D. R. Diffuse axonal injury in head injury: definition, diagnosis and grading. Histopathology. 15:1989;49-59.
2. Banich, M. T. Passarotti, A. Interhemispheric interaction aids task performance under conditions of selective attention.
3. Banich, M. T. Passarotti, A. Parallel processing between the hemispheres increases processing capacity.
4. Banich M. T., Belger A. Interhemispheric interaction: How do the hemispheres divide and conquer a task? Cortex. 26:1990;77-94.
5. Banich M. T., Goering S., Stolar N., Belger A. Interhemispheric processing in left- and right-handers. International Journal of Neuroscience. 54:1990;197-208.
6. Banich M. T., Shenker J. Investigations of interhemispheric processing: Methodological considerations. Neuropsychology. 8:1994;263-277.
7. Banich, M. T. Passarotti, A. Chambers, C. 1994, The role of the corpus callosum in attentional processing, Inaugural meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society
8. Barnard R. O., Triggs M. Corpus callosum in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. 37:1974;1259-1264.
9. Belger, A. 1993, Influences of hemispheric specialization and interaction on task performance.
10. Belger, A. Banich, M. T. Costs and benefits of integrating information between the cerebral hemispheres: A computational perspective, Neuropsychology.
11. Belger A., Banich M. T. Interhemispheric interaction affected by computational complexity. Neuropsychologia. 30:1992;923-931.
12. Braun C. M. J., Daigneault S. Effects of a right hemifield advantage on crossed-uncrossed differentials in simple reaction time: Toward a new model of interhemispheric relay. Acta Psychologica. 85:1994;91-98.
13. Cohen J. D., Dunbar K., McClelland J. L. On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing model of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review. 97:1990;332-361.
14. Cohen J. D., Servan-Schreiber D., McClelland J. L. A parallel distributed processing approach to automaticity. American Journal of Psychology. 105:1992;239-269.
15. Corbetta M., Miezin F. M., Dobmeyer S., Shulman G. L., Petersen S. E. Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: Functional anatomy by positron emission tomography. The Journal of Neuroscience. 11:1991;2383-2402.
16. David A. S. Stroop effects within and between the cerebral hemispheres: Studies in normals and acallosals. Neuropsychologia. 30:1992;161-175.
17. DeLacoste M. C., Kirkpatrick J. B., Ross E. D. Topography of the human corpus callosum. Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology. 44:1985;578-591.
18. Dimond S. J. Depletion of attentional capacity after total commissurotomy in man. Brain. 99:1976;347-356.
19. Dimond S. J. Tactual and auditory vigilance in split-brain man. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 42:1979;70-74.
20. Ellenberg L., Sperry R. W. Capacity for holding sustained attention following commissurotomy. Cortex. 15:1979;421-438.
21. Gazzaniga M. S. Perceptual and attentional processes following callosal section in humans. Neuropsychologia. 25:1987;119-133.
22. Giedd J. N., Rumsey J. M., Castellanos F. X., Rajapakse J. C., Kaysen D., Vaituzis A. C., Vauss Y. C., Hamburger S. D., Rapoport J. L. A quantitative MRI study of the corpus callosum in children and adolescents. Developmental Brain Research. 91:1996;274-280.
23. Hellige J. B., Cox P. J. Effects of concurrent verbal memory on recognition of stimuli from the left and right visual fields. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2:1976;210-221.
24. Herdman C. M., Friedman A. Multiple resources in divided attention: A cross modal test of independence of hemispheric resources. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 11:1985;40-49.
25. Holtzman J. D., Gazzaniga M. S. Dual task interactions due exclusively to limits in processing resources. Science. 218:1982;1325-1327.
26. Holtzman J. D., Gazzaniga M. S. Enhanced dual task performance following corpus commissurotomy in humans. Neuropsychologia. 23:1985;315-321.
27. Hughes E. C., Weinstein R. C., Gott P. S., Binggeli R., Whitaker K. L. Food sensitivity in attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity (ADD/HA): A procedure for differential diagnosis. Annals of Allergy. 49:1982;276-280.
28. Hynd W., Semrud-Clikeman M., Lorys A. R., Novey E. S., Elipulos D., Lyytinen H. Corpus callosum morphology in attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder: Morphometric analysis of MRI. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 24:1991;141-146.
29. Jacobson J. T., Deppe U., Murray T. J. Dichotic paradigms in multiple sclerosis. Ear and Hearing. 4:1983;311-317.
30. Kahneman D. Attention and effort. 1973;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
31. Kimchi R., Palmer S. E. Separability and integrality of global and local levels of hierarchical patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 11:1985;673-688.
32. Kinsbourne M., Hicks R. E. Functional cerebral space: A model for overflow, transfer and interference effects in human performance: a tutorial review. Attention and performance VII. 1978;Erlbaum, Hillsdale. p. 345-362.
33. Knight R. T., Hillyard S. A., Woods D. L., Neville S. J. The effects of frontal cortex lesions on event-related potentials during auditory selective attention. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 52:1981;571-582.
34. Kramer A. F., Coles M. G. H., Logan G. D. Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention. 1996;American Psychological Association Press, Washington.
35. Kreuter C., Kinsbourne M., Trevarthen C. Are deconnected cerebral hemispheres independent channels? A preliminary study of the effect of unilateral loading on bilateral finger tapping. Neuropsychologia. 10:1972;453-461.
36. LaBerge D. L. Attention. Psychological Science. 1:1990;156-162.
37. LaBerge D., Buchsbaum M. S. Positron emission tomographic measurements of pulvinar activity during an attention task. The Journal of Neuroscience. 10:1990;613-619.
38. Levin H. S., Grossman R. G., Sarwar M., Meyers C. A. Linguistic recovery after closed head injury. Brain and Language. 12:1981;360-374.
39. Levin H. S., High W. M., Williams D. J., Eisenberg H. M., Amparo E., Guinto F., Ewert J. Dichotic listening and manual performance in relation to magnetic resonance imaging after closed head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. 52:1989;1162-1169.
40. Liederman J. Subtraction in addition to addition: Dual task performance improves when tasks are presented to separate hemispheres. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology. 8:1986;486-502.
41. Liederman J., Merola J., Hoffman C. Longitudinal data indicate that hemispheric independence increases during early adolescence. Developmental Neuropsychology. 2:1986;183-201.
42. Lindeboom J., Horst R. T. Interhemispheric disconnection in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. 51:1988;1445-1447.
43. Luck S. J., Hillyard S. A., Mangun G. R., Gazzaniga M. S. Independent attentional systems mediate visual search in split-brain patients. Nature. 342:1989;543-545.
44. Marzi C. A., Bisiacchi P., Nicoletti R. Is interhemispheric transfer of visuomotor information asymmetric? Evidence from a meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia. 29:1991;1163-1177.
45. Merola J. L., Liederman J. Developmental changes in hemispheric independence. Child Development. 56:1985;1184-1196.
46. Merola J. L., Liederman J. The effect of task difficulty upon the extent to which performance benefits from between-hemisphere division of inputs. International Journal of Neuroscience. 51:1990;35-44.
47. Mesulam M.-M. A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Annals of Neurology. 10:1981;309-325.
48. Navon D. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology. 9:1977;353-383.
49. Nelson M. E., Bower J. M. Brain maps and parallel computers. Trends in Neuroscience. 13:1990;403-408.
50. Pardo J. V., Pardo P. J., Janer K. W., Raichle M. E. The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science. 87:1990;256-259.
51. Passarotti, A. Banich, M. T. A generalized role of interhemispheric interaction under attentionally-demanding conditions: Evidence from the auditory and tactile modalities.
52. Pelletier J., Habib M., Lyon-Caen O., Salamon G., Poncet M., Khalil R. Functional and MRI correlates of callosal involvement in multiple sclerosis. Archives of Neurology. 50:1993;1077-1082.
53. Posner M. I., Inhoff A. W., Friedrich F. J., Cohen A. Isolating attentional systems: A cognitive-anatomical analysis. Psychobiology. 15:1987;107-121.
54. Rao S. M., Bernardin L., Leo G. J., Ellington L., Ryan S. B., Burg L. S. Cerebral disconnection in multiple sclerosis: relationship to atrophy of the corpus callosum. Archives of Neurology. 46:1989;918-920.
55. Rayman J., Zaidel E. Rhyme and the right hemisphere. Brain and Language. 40:1991;89-105.
56. Robertson L., Lamb M. R. Neuropsychological contributions to theories of part/whole organization. Cognitive Psychology. 23:1991;299-330.
57. Robertson L. C., Lamb M. R., Knight R. T. Effects of lesions of temporal-parietal junction on perceptual and attentional processing in humans. The Journal of Neuroscience. 8:1988;3757-3769.
58. Robertson L. C., Lamb M. R., Zaidel E. Interhemispheric relations in processing hierarchical patterns: Evidence from normal and commissurotomized subjects. Neuropsychology. 7:1993;325-342.
59. Rubens A. B., Geschwind N., Mahowald M. W., Mastri A. Post-traumatic cerebral hemispheric disconnection syndrome. Archives of Neurology. 34:1977;750-755.
60. Rubens A. L., Froehling B., Slater G., Anderson D. Left ear suppression on verbal dichotic tests in patients with multiple sclerosis. Annals of Neurology. 18:1985;459-463.
61. Rueckert L., Levy J. Further evidence that the callosum is involved in sustaining attention. Neuropsychologia. 34:1996;927-935.
62. Rueckert L., Sorenson L., Levy J. Callosal efficiency is related to sustained attention. Neuropsychologia. 32:1994;159-173.
63. Rugg M. D., Lines C. R., Milner A. D. Visual evoked potentials to lateralized visual stimuli and the measurement of interhemispheric transmission time. Neuropsychologia. 22:1984;215-225.
64. Salamy A. Commissural transmission: Maturational changes in humans. Science. 200:1978;1409-1411.
65. Sergent J. Furtive incursions into bicameral minds: Integrative and coordinating role of subcortical structures. Brain. 113:1990;537-568.
66. Shenker, J. I. Dori, E. Banich, M. T. 1994, Hemispheric contributions to facilitation and inhibition in the Stroop paradigm, Annual Meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society
67. Shenker, J. I. Banich, M. T. The modulation of attentional capacity in the Stroop task by communication between the cerebral hemispheres.
68. Simon J. H., Holtas S. L., Schiffer R. B., Rudick R. A. Corpus callosum and subcallosal-periventricular lesions in multiple sclerosis: detection with MR. Radiology. 160:1986;363-367.
69. Treisman A. M., Gelade P. A. A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology. 12:1980;97-136.
70. Teng E. L., Sperry R. W. Interhemispheric interaction during simultaneous bilateral presentation of letters and digits in commissurotomized patients. Neuropsychologia. 11:1973;131-140.
71. Teng E. L., Sperry R. W. Interhemispheric rivalry during simultaneous bilateral task presentation in commissurotomized patients. Cortex. 10:1974;111-120.
72. Van Kleeck M. H. Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli by normal subjects: New data and a meta-analysis of previous studies. Neuropsychologia. 27:1989;1165-1178.
73. Weissman, D. H. Banich, M. T. Global-local interference modulated by interaction between the hemispheres.
74. Weekes N. Y., Carusi D., Zaidel E. Interhemispheric relations in hierarchical perception: A second look. Neuropsychologia. 35:1997;37-44.
75. Weekes N. Y., Zaidel E. The effects of procedural variations on lateralized Stroop effects. Brain & Cognition. 31:1996;308-330.
76. Wickens C. D., Liu Y. Codes and modalities in multiple resources: A success and a qualification. Human Factors. 30:1988;599-616.
77. Zaidel E., Rayman J. Interhemispheric control in the normal brain: Evidence from redundant bilateral presentations. Umilta C., Morris Moscovitch M. Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing. 1994;The MIT Press, Cambridge.