The cross-over effect in unilateral neglect. Modelling detailed data in the line-bisection task

Brain

Volumn 121, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 907-921

  Monaghan, Padraic ^a   Shillcock, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attention; Connectionist modelling; Line bisection; Neglect

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER MODEL; HUMAN; LEFT HEMISPHERE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; VISUAL DEPRIVATION;

EID: 0031945868     PISSN: 00068950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/brain/121.5.907     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Andersen RA, Essick GK, Siegel RM. Encoding of spatial location by posterior parietal neurons. Science 1985; 230: 456-8.
2. Andersen RA, Asanuma C, Essick GK, Siegel RM. Corticocortical connections of anatomically and physiologically defined subdivisions within the inferior parietal lobule. J Comp Neurol 1990; 296: 65-113.
3. Anderson B. A mathematical model of line bisection behaviour in neglect. Brain 1996; 119: 841-50.
4. Bisiach E, Berti A. Dyschiria: An attempt at its systematic explanation. In: Jeannerod M, editor. Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect. Amsterdam: North-Holland; 1987. p. 183-201.
5. Bisiach E, Geminiani G. Anosognosia related to hemiplegia and hemianopia. In: Prigatano G, Schacter DL, editors. Awareness of deficit after brain injury. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991.
6. Bisiach E, Capitani E. Colombo A, Spinnler H. Halving a horizontal segment: a study on hemisphere-damaged patients with cerebral focal lesions. Schweiz Arch Neurol Neurochirg Psychiatr 1976; 118: 199-206.
7. Bisiach E, Bulgarelli C, Sterzi R, Vallar G. Line bisection and cognitive plasticity of unilateral neglect of space. Brain Cogn 1983; 2: 32-8.
8. Bisiach E, Meregalli S, Berti A. Mechanisms of production control and belief fixation in human visuospatial processing: clinical evidence from unilateral neglect and misrepresentation. In: Commons ML, Herrnstein RJ, Kosslyn SM, Mumford DB, editors. Models of behavior: computational and clinical approaches to pattern recognition and concept formation. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum; 1990.
9. Bradshaw JL, Nettleton NC, Nathan G, Wilson L. Bisecting rods and lines: effects of horizontal and vertical posture on left side underestimation by normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 1985; 23: 421-5.
10. Brown HD, Kosslyn SM. Cerebral lateralization. [Review]. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1993; 3: 183-6.
11. Burnett-Stuart G, Halligan PW, Marshall JC. A Newtonian model of perceptual distortion in visuo-spatial neglect. Neuroreport 1991; 2: 255-7.
12. Chatterjee A. Cross-over, completion and confabulation in unilateral spatial neglect. Brain 1995; 118: 455-65.
13. Chatterjee A, Mennemeier M, Heilman K M. A stimulus-response relationship in unilateral neglect: the power function. Neuropsychologia 1992; 30: 1101-8.
14. Chokron S. De Agostini M. Reading habits and line bisection: a developmental approach. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 1995; 3: 51-8.
15. De Renzi E, Gentilini M, Faglioni P, Barbieri C. Attentional shift towards the rightmost stimuli in patients with left visual neglect. Cortex 1989; 25: 231-7.
16. Gainotti G, Tiacci C. The relationships between disorders of visual perception and unilateral spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 1971; 9: 451-8.
17. Halligan P. Drawing attention to neglect. Psychologist 1995; 8: 257-64.
18. Halligan PW, Marshall JC How long is a piece of string? A study of line bisection in a case of visual neglect. Cortex 1988; 24: 321-8.
19. Halligan PW, Marshall JC. Line bisection in visuo-spatial neglect: disproof of a conjecture. Cortex 1989a; 25: 517-21.
20. Halligan PW, Marshall JC. Perceptual cueing and perceptuo-motor compatibility in visuo-spatial neglect: a single case study. Cogn Neuropsychol 1989b; 6: 423-35.
21. Halligan PW, Marshall JC. Figurai modulation of visuo-spatial neglect: a case study. Neuropsychologia 1991; 29: 619-28.
22. Halligan PW, Marshall JC. Left visuo-spatial neglect: a meaningless entity? Cortex 1992; 28: 525-35.
23. Halligan PW, Marshall JC. Toward a principled explanation of unilateral neglect. Cogn Neuropsychol 1994; 11: 167-206.
24. Heilman KM, Valenstein E. Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect. Ann Neurol 1979; 5: 166-70.
25. Heilman KM, Van Den Abell T. Right hemisphere dominance for attention: the mechanism underlying hemispheric asymmetries of inattention (neglect). Neurology 1980; 30: 327-30.
26. Hillis AE, Caramazza A. The effects of attentional deficits on reading and spelling. In: Caramazza A, editor. Cognitive neuropsychology and neurolinguistics: advances in models of cognitive function and impairment. Hilldale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum; 1990. p. 211-75.
27. Ishiai S, Sugishita M, Mitani K, Ishizawa M. Leftward search in left unilateral spatial neglect. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992; 55: 40-4.
28. Kinsbourne M. A model for the mechanism of unilateral neglect of space. Transactions of the Am Neurol Ass 1970a; 95: 143-6.
29. Kinsbourne M. The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. Acta Psychol (Amst) 1970b; 33: 193-201.
30. Kinsbourne M. Lateral interactions in the brain. In: Kinsbourne M, Smith WL, editors. Hemispheric disconnection and cerebral function. Springfield (IL): Charles C. Thomas; 1974. p. 239-59.
31. Kinsbourne M. Hemi-neglect and hemisphere rivalry. Adv Neurol 1977; 18: 41-9.
32. Kinsbourne M. Orientational bias model of unilateral neglect: evidence from attentional gradients within hemispace. In: Robertson IH, Marshall JC, editors. Unilateral neglect: Clinical and experimental studies. Hove (UK) Lawrence Erlbaum; 1993. p. 63-86.
33. Kinsbourne M, Warrington EK. A variety of reading disability associated with right hemisphere lesions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1962; 25: 339-44.
34. Kosslyn SM, Chabris CF, Marsolek CJ, Koenig O. Categorical versus coordinate spatial relations: computational analyses and computer simulations. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1992; 18: 562-77.
35. Ladavas E. Selective spatial attention in patients with visual extinction. Brain 1990; 113: 1527-38.
36. Ladavas E, Petronio A, Umilta C. The deployment of visual attention in the intact field of hemineglect patients. Cortex 1990; 26: 307-17.
37. Luck SJ, Hillyard SA, Mangun GR, Gazzaniga MS. Independent hemispheric attentional systems mediate visual search in split-brain patients. Nature 1989; 342: 543-5.
38. Marshall JC, Halligan PW. Does the midsagittal plane play any privileged role in 'left' neglect? Cogn Neuropsychol 1989a; 6: 403-22.
39. Marshall JC, Halligan PW. When right goes left: an investigation of line bisection in a case of visual neglect. Cortex 1989b; 25 3: 503-15.
40. Marshall JC, Halligan PW. Line bisection in a case of visual neglect: psychophysical studies with implications for theory. Cogn Neuropsychol 1990; 7: 107-30.
41. Mozer MC, Behrmann M. On the interaction of selective attention and lexical knowledge: a connectionist account of neglect dyslexia. J Cogn Neurosci 1990; 2: 96-123.
42. Mozer MC, Halligan PW, Marshall JC. The end of the line for a brain-damaged model of unilateral neglect. J Cogn Neurosci 1997; 9: 171-90.
43. Nichelli P, Rinaldi M, Cubelli R. Selective spatial attention and length representation in normal subjects and in patients with unilateral spatial neglect. Brain Cogn 1989; 9: 57-70.
44. O'Reilly RC, Dawson CK, McClelland JL. PDP++ neural network simulation software. Pittsburgh (PA): Carnegie Mellon University; 1995.
45. Posner MI, Walker JA, Friedrich FJ, Rafal RD. Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention. J Neurosci 1984; 4: 1863-974.
46. Pouget A, Sejnowski TJ. Spatial representations in the parietal cortex may use basis functions. In: Tesauro G, Touretzky DS, Leen TK, editors. Advances in neural information processing systems 7. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1995.
47. Pouget A, Sejnowski TJ. Lesion in a basis function model of parietal cortex: Comparison with hemineglect. In: Thier P, Karnath HO, editors. Parietal lobe contributions in orientation in 3D space. Berlin: Springer; 1997. p. 521-38.
48. Reuter-Lorenz PA, Posner MI. Components of neglect from righthemisphere damage: an analysis of line bisection. Neuropsychologia 1990; 28: 327-33.
49. Riddoch MJ, Humphreys GW. The effect of cueing on unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia 1983; 21: 589-99.
50. Rizzolatti G, Berti A. Neglect as a neural representation deficit. [Review]. Rev Neurol (Paris) 1990; 146: 626-34.
51. Rizzolatti G, Berti A. Neural mechanisms of spatial neglect. In: Robertson IH, Marshall JC, editors. Unilateral neglect: clinical and experimental studies. Hove (UK): Lawrence Erlbaum; 1993. p. 87-105.
52. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ. Learning internal representations by error propagation. In: Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL, editors. Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, Vol. 1. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1986. p. 318-62
53. Schenkenberg T, Bradford DC, Ajax ET. Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurologic impairment. Neurology 1980; 30: 509-17.
54. Shillcock RC, Cairns P. A connectionist model of hemispheric interaction in unilateral visuospatial neglect. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society conference, 1995. Pittsburgh.
55. Shuren J, Wertman E, Heilman KM. The neglected page. Cortex 1994; 30: 171-5.
56. Stone SP, Wilson B, Wroot A, Halligan PW, Lange LS, Marshall JC, et al. The assessment of visuo-spatial neglect after acute stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1991; 54: 345-50.
57. Tegnér R, Levander M. The influence of stimulus properties on visual neglect. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1991; 54: 882-7.
58. Vallar G. The anatomical basis of spatial hemineglect in humans. In: Robertson IH, Marshall JC, editors. Unilateral neglect: clinical and experimental studies. Hove (UK): Lawrence Erlbaum; 1993. p. 27-59.
59. Weber EH. De pulsu, resorptione, auditu et tactu. Lipsiae: C. F. Koehler; 1834.
60. Woodworth RS, Schlosberg H. Experimental psychology. Rev. ed. London: Methuen; 1955.