Attention rivalry under irrelevant audiovisual stimulation

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 438, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 6-9

  Feng, Ting ^a   Qiu, Yihong ^a   Zhu, Yisheng ^a   Tong, Shanbao ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Attention; Audiovisual interaction; Bimodal stimulus; Event related potential; Rivalry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; FRONTAL CORTEX; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURAL INHIBITION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 43549125718     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.04.049     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aron A.R., Robbins T.W., and Poldrack R.A. Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8 (2004) 170-177
2. Basar-Eroglu C., Demiralp T., Schurmann M., and Basar E. Topological distribution of oddball 'P300' responses. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 39 (2001) 213-220
3. Campbell R., and Dodd B. Hearing by eye. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 32 (1980) 85-99
4. Comerchero M.D., and Polich J. P3a, perceptual distinctiveness, and stimulus modality. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 7 (1998) 41-48
5. Corbetta M. Frontoparietal cortical networks for directing attention and the eye to visual locations: identical, independent, or overlapping neural systems?. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. US 95 (1998) 831-838
6. Corbetta M., and Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3 (2002) 201-215
7. Duncan J., and Owen A.M. Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands. Trends Neurosci. 23 (2000) 475-483
8. Eimer M., van Velzen J., and Driver J. Cross-modal interactions between audition, touch, and vision in endogenous spatial attention: ERP evidence on preparatory states and sensory modulations. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 14 (2002) 254-271
9. Fort A., Delpuech C., Pemier J., and Giard M.H. Early auditory-visual interactions in human cortex during nonredundant target identification. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 14 (2002) 20-30
10. Giard M.H., and Peronnet F. Auditory-visual integration during multimodal object recognition in humans: a behavioral and electrophysiological study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 11 (1999) 473-490
11. Isoglu-alkac U., Kedzior K., Karamursel S., and Ermutlu N. Event-related potentials during auditory oddball, and combined auditory oddball-visual paradigms. Int. J. Neurosci. 117 (2007) 487-506
12. King A.J., and Palmer A.R. Integration of visual and auditory information in bimodal neurons in the guinea-pig superior colliculus. Exp. Brain Res. 60 (1985) 492-500
13. McDonald J.J., Teder-Salejarvi W.A., Di Russo F., and Hillyard S.A. Neural substrates of perceptual enhancement by cross-modal spatial attention. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 15 (2003) 10-19
14. McGurk H., and MacDonald J. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 264 (1976) 746-748
15. Meredith M.A. On the neuronal basis for multisensory convergence: a brief overview. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 14 (2002) 31-40
16. Meredith M.A., and Stein B.E. Visual, auditory, and somatosensory convergence on cells in superior colliculus results in multisensory integration. J. Neurophysiol. 56 (1986) 640-662
17. Miller J. Divided attention: evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cogn. Psychol. 14 (1982) 247-279
18. Molholm S., Ritter W., Javitt D.C., and Foxe J.J. Multisensory visual-auditory object recognition in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study. Cereb. Cortex 14 (2004) 452-465
19. Molholm S., Ritter W., Murray M.M., Javitt D.C., Schroeder C.E., and Foxe J.J. Multisensory auditory-visual interactions during early sensory processing in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 14 (2002) 115-128
20. Niiyama Y., Satoh N., Kutsuzawa O., and Hishikawa Y. Electrophysiological evidence suggesting that sensory stimuli of unknown origin induce spontaneous K-complexes. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 98 (1996) 394-400
21. Picton T.W. The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 9 (1992) 456-479
22. Polich J. Normal variation of P300 from auditory stimuli. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 65 (1986) 236-240
23. Polich J. P300 clinical utility and control of variability. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 15 (1998) 14-33
24. Polich J., Alexander J.E., Bauer L.O., Kuperman S., Morzorati S., O'Connor S.J., Porjesz B., Rohrbaugh J., and Begleiter H. P300 topography of amplitude/latency correlations. Brain Topogr. 9 (1997) 275-282
25. Polich J., Eischen S.E., and Collins G.E. P300 from a single auditory stimulus. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 92 (1994) 253-261
26. Praamstra P., Boutsen L., and Humphreys G.W. Frontoparietal control of spatial attention and motor intention in human EEG. J. Neurophysiol. 94 (2005) 764-774
27. Ridderinkhof K.R., Ullsperger M., Crone E.A., and Nieuwenhuis S. The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science 306 (2004) 443-447
28. Sakowitz O.W., Schurmann M., and Basar E. Oscillatory frontal theta responses are increased upon bisensory stimulation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 111 (2000) 884-893
29. Schifferstein H.N. The perceived importance of sensory modalities in product usage: a study of self-reports. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 121 (2006) 41-64
30. Shams L., Kamitani Y., and Shimojo S. Illusions. What you see is what you hear. Nature 408 (2000) 788
31. Singhal A., Doerfling P., and Fowler B. Effects of a dual task on the N100-P200 complex and the early and late Nd attention waveforms. Psychophysiology 39 (2002) 236-245
32. Stein B.E., London N., Wilkinson L.K., and Price D.D. Enhancement of perceived visual intensity by auditory stimuli: a psychophysical analysis. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 8 (1996) 497-506
33. Teder-Salejarvi W.A., McDonald J.J., Di Russo F., and Hillyard S.A. An analysis of audio-visual crossmodal integration by means of event-related potential (ERP) recordings. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 14 (2002) 106-114
34. Teder-Salejarvi W.A., Munte T.F., Sperlich F., and Hillyard S.A. Intra-modal and cross-modal spatial attention to auditory and visual stimuli. An event-related brain potential study. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 8 (1999) 327-343
35. Thompson L.A. Encoding and memory for visible speech and gestures: a comparison between young and older adults. Psychol. Aging 10 (1995) 215-228
36. Warren D.H., Welch R.B., and McCarthy T.J. The role of visual-auditory "compellingness" in the ventriloquism effect: implications for transitivity among the spatial senses. Percept. Psychophys. 30 (1981) 557-564
37. Yantis S. Goal-directed and stimulus-driven determinants of attentional control. In: Monsell S., and Driver J. (Eds). Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge 73-103
38. Yordanova J., Kolev V., Rosso O.A., Schurmann M., Sakowitz O.W., Ozgoren M., and Basar E. Wavelet entropy analysis of event-related potentials indicates modality-independent theta dominance. J. Neurosci. Methods 117 (2002) 99-109