Cricket song in sympatry: Species specificity of song without reproductive character displacement in Gryllus rubens

Annals of the Entomological Society of America

Volumn 97, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 831-837

  Izzo, Amanda S ^a   Gray, David A ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Crickets; Reinforcement; Speciation

Indexed keywords

CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT; CRICKET; SONG; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); SYMPATRY;

GRYLLIDAE; GRYLLINAE; GRYLLUS; GRYLLUS RUBENS; GRYLLUS TEXENSIS; ORTHOPTERA;

EID: 4344663670     PISSN: 00138746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1603/0013-8746(2004)097[0831:CSISSS]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bertram, S. 2002. The influence of rearing and monitoring environment on temporal mate signaling patterns in the field cricket, Gryllus texensis. J. Insect Behav. 15: 127-137.
2. Bertram, S., and R. Bellani. 2002. Influence of photoperiod on temporal mate signaling patterns in the Texas field cricket, Gryllus texensis. J. Insect Behav. 15: 607-615.
3. Broughton, R. E., and R. G. Harrison. 2003. Nuclear gene genealogies reveal historical, demographic and selective factors associated with speciation in field crickets. Genetics 163: 1389-1401.
4. Butlin, R. K., and M. G. Ritchie. 1994. Mating behaviour and speciation. In P.J.B. Slater and T. R. Halliday eds. Behaviour and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
5. Cade, W. H. 1979. Field cricket dispersal flights measured by crickets landing at lights. Tex. J. Sci. XXXI: 125-130.
6. Cade, W. H., and M. G. Tyshenko. 1990. Geographic variation in hybrid fertility in the field crickets Gryllus integer, G. rubens, and Gryllus sp. Can. J. Zool. 68: 2697-2700.
7. Dobzhansky, T. 1937. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York.
8. Doherty, J. A., and D. Callos. 1991. Acoustic communication in the trilling field cricket, Gryllus rubens (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). J. Insect Behav. 4: 67-82.
9. Doherty, J. A., and D. J. Howard. 1996. Lack of preference for conspecific calling songs in female crickets. Anim. Behav. 51: 981-989.
10. Doherty, J. A., and M. M. Storz. 1992. Calling song and selective phonotaxis in the field crickets, Gryllus firmus and G. pennsylvanicus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). J. Insect Behav. 5: 555-569.
11. Fitzpatrick, M. J., and D. A. Gray. 2001. Divergence between the courtship songs of Gryllus texensis and G. rubens (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Ethology 107: 1075-1086.
12. Gerhardt, H. C. 1991. Female choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria. Anim. Behav. 42: 615-636.
13. Gerhardt, H. C. 1994. Reproductive character displacement of female mate choice in the grey treefrog, Hyla chrysoscelis. Anim. Behav. 47: 959-969.
14. Gerhardt, H. C., and F. Huber. 2002. Acoustic communication in insects and anurans: common problems and diverse solutions. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
15. Gray, D. A., and W. H. Cade. 2000. Sexual selection and speciation in field crickets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 14449-14454.
16. Gray, D. A., T.J. Walker, B. E. Conley, and W. H. Cade. 2001. A morphological means of distinguishing females of the cryptic field cricket species, Gryllus rubens and G. texensis (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Fla. Entomol. 84: 314-315.
17. Gregory, P. G., M. D. Remmenga, and D. J. Howard. 1998. Patterns of mating between two closely related ground crickets are not influenced by sympatry. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 87: 263-270.
18. Harrison, R. G. 1985. Barriers to gene exchange between closely related cricket species. II. Life cycle variation and temporal isolation. Evolution 39: 244-259.
19. Henry, C. S., M.L.M. Wells, and C. M. Simon. 1999. Convergent evolution of courtship songs among cryptic species of the Carnea group of green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Chrysoperla). Evolution 53: 1165-1179.
20. Higgie, M., S. Chenoweth, and M. W. Blows. 2000. Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. Science (Wash. DC) 290: 519-521.
21. Hill, G., J. J. Loftus-Hills, and D. F. Gartside. 1972. Premating isolation between the Australian field crickets Teleogryllus commodus and T oceanicus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Aust. J. Zool. 20: 153-163.
22. Howard, D. J. 1986. A zone of overlap and hybridization between two ground cricket species. Evolution 40:34-43.
23. Howard, D. J. 1993. Reinforcement: origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. In R. G. Harrison [ed.], Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
24. Howard, D. J., and G. L. Waring. 1991. Topographic diversity, zone width, and the strength of reproductive isolation in a zone of overlap and hybridization. Evolution 45: 1120-1135.
25. Huang, Y., G. Ortí, M. Sutherlin, A. Duhachek, and A. Zera. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships of North American field crickets inferred from mitochondrial DNA data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 17: 48-57.
26. Marshall, D. C., and J. R. Cooley. 2000. Reproductive character displacement and speciation in periodical cicadas, with description of a new species, 13-year Magicicada neotredecim. Evolution 54: 1313-1325.
27. Martin, S. D., D. A. Gray, and W. H. Cade. 2000. Fine-scale temperature effects on cricket calling song. Can. J. Zool. 78: 706-712.
28. Ritchie, M. G. 1996. The shape of female mating preferences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 14628-14631.
29. Ritchie, M. G., and J. M. Gleason. 1995. Rapid evolution of courtship song pattern in Drosophila willistoni sibling species. J. Evol. Biol. 8: 463-479.
30. Ritchie, M. G., E. J. Halsey, and J. M. Gleason. 1999. Drosophila song as a species-specific mating signal and the behavioural importance of Kyriacou & Hall cycles in D. melanogaster song. Anim. Behav. 58: 649-657.
31. Roff, D. A., T. A. Mousseau, and D. J. Howard. 1999. Variation in genetic architecture of calling song among populations of Allonemobius socius, A. fasciatus, and a hybrid population: drift or selection? Evolution 53: 216-224.
32. Ryan, M. J. 1990. Signals, species, and sexual selection. Am. Sci. 78: 46-52.
33. Ryan, M. J., and A. S. Rand. 1993. Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution 47: 647-657.
34. Shaw, K. L. 1999. A nested analysis of song groups and species boundaries in the Hawaiian cricket genus Laupala. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 11: 332-341.
35. Shaw, K.L. 2000. Interspecific genetics of mate recognition: inheritance of female acoustic preference in Hawaiian crickets. Evolution 54: 1303-1312.
36. Shaw, K. L., and D. P. Herlihy. 2000. Acoustic preference functions and song variability in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala cerasina. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B. 267: 577-584.
37. Smith, C. J., and W. H. Cade. 1987. Relative fertility in hybridization experiments using three song types of the field crickets Gryllus integer and Gryllus rubens. Can. J. Zool. 65: 2390-2394.
38. Tregenza, T. 2002. Divergence and reproductive isolation in the early stages of speciation. Genetica 116: 291-300.
39. Tregenza, T., V. L. Pritchard, and R. K. Butlin. 2000. The origins of premating reproductive isolation: testing hypotheses in the grasshopper Chorthippus parallelus. Evolution 54: 1687-1698.
40. Veech, J. A., J. H. Benedix, Jr., and D. J. Howard. 1996. Lack of calling song displacement between two closely related ground crickets. Evolution 50: 1982-1989.
41. Walker, T. J. 1974. Character displacement and acoustic insects. Am. Zool. 14: 1137-1150.
42. Walker, T. J. 1998. Trilling field crickets in a zone of overlap (Orthoptera: Gryllidae: Gryllus). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 91: 175-184.
43. Walker, T. J. 2000. Pulse rates in the songs of trilling field crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae: Gryllus). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 93: 565-572.
44. Wells, M. M., and C. S. Henry. 1998. Songs, reproductive isolation, and speciation in cryptic species of insects. In D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher [eds.], Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford University Press, New York.