Variation in genetic architecture of calling song among populations of Allonemobius socius, A. fasciatus, and a hybrid population drift or selection?

Evolution

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 216-224

  Roff, Derek A ^a   Mousseau, Timothy A ^b   Howard, Daniel J ^c  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Genetic correlation; Genetic covariance; Genetic variance; Heritability; Quantitative genetics

Indexed keywords

HERITABILITY; QUANTITATIVE GENETICS;

GENETIC STRUCTURE; GENETIC VARIATION; SONG;

ALLONEMOBIUS FASCIATUS; ALLONEMOBIUS SOCIUS;

EID: 0033040173     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05347.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. ALEXANDER, R. D. 1975. Natural selection and specialized chorusing behavior in acoustical insects. Pp. 35-77 in D. Pimentel, ed. Insects, science, and society. Academic Press, New York.
2. ARNOLD, S. J. 1992. Constraints on phenotypic evolution. Am. Nat. 140 (Suppl.):85-107.
3. BENEDIX, J. H., JR., AND D. J. HOWARD. 1991. Calling song displacement in a zone of overlap and hybridization. Evolution 45: 1751-1759.
4. BUTLIN, R. K., AND G. M. HEWITT. 1986. Heritability estimates for characters under sexual selection in the grasshopper, Chorthippus brunneus. Anim. Behav. 34:1256-1261.
5. CADE, W. H., AND E. S. CADE. 1992. Male mating success, calling and searching behaviour at high and low densities in the field cricket, Gryllus integer. Anim. Behav. 43:49-56.
6. CHEVERUD, J. M. 1988. A comparison of genetic and phenotypic correlations. Evolution 42:958-968.
7. CRNOKRAK, P., AND D. A. ROFF. 1998. The genetic basis of the trade-off between calling and wing morph in males of the cricket, Gryllus firmus. Evolution 52:1111-1118.
8. DOHERTY, J. A., AND D. J. HOWARD. 1996. Lack of preference for conspecific calling songs in female crickets. Anim. Behav. 51: 981-989.
9. FORREST, T. G. 1983. Calling songs and mate choice in mole crickets. Pp. 185-204 in D. T. Gwynne and G. K. Morris, eds. Orthopteran mating systems. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
10. GREGORY, P. G., AND D. J. HOWARD. 1993. Laboratory hybridization studies of Allonemobius fasciatus and A. socius (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 86:694-701.
11. _. 1994. A post-insemination barrier to fertilization isolates two closely related ground crickets. Evolution 48:705-710.
12. HEDRICK, A. V. 1986. Female preferences for male calling bout duration in a field cricket. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19:73-77.
13. _. 1988. Female choice and the heritability of attractive male traits: an empirical study. Am. Nat. 132:267-276.
14. HEDRICK, A. V., AND L. M. DILL. 1993. Mate choice by female crickets is influenced by predation risk. Anim. Behav. 46:193-196.
15. HOWARD, D. J. 1983. Electrophoretic survey of eastern North American Allonemobius (Orthoptera: Gryllidae): evolutionary relationships and the discovery of three new species. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 76:1014-1021.
16. _. 1986. A zone of overlap and hybridization between two ground cricket species. Evolution 40:34-43.
17. _. 1993. Reinforcement: the origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. Pp. 46-69 in R. G. Harrison, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
18. HOWARD, D. J., AND D. G. FURTH. 1986. Review of the Allonemobius fasciatus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) complx with the description of two new species separaeparated by electrophoresis, songs, and morphometrics. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 76:1014-1021.
19. HOWARD, D. J., AND P. G. GREGORY. 1993. Post-insemination signalling systems and reinforcement. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 340:231-236.
20. HOWARD, D. J., AND G. L. WARING. 1991. Topographic diversity, zone width, and the strength of reproductive isolation in a zone of overlap and hybridization. Evolution 45:1120-1135.
21. HOWARD, D. J., G. L. WARING, C. A. TIBBETS, AND P. G. GREGORY. 1993. Survival of hybrids in a mosaic hybrid zone. Evolution 47:789-800.
22. LANDE, R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution applied to brain:body size allometry. Evolution 33:402-416.
23. LOFSVOLD, D. 1988. Quantitative genetics of morphological differentiation in Peromyscus. II. Analysis of selection and drift. Evolution 42:54-67.
24. MANLY, B. F. J. 1997. Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology. Chapman and Hall, New York.
25. MOUSSEAU, T. A., AND D. J. HOWARD. 1998. Genetic variation in cricket calling song across a hybrid zone between two sibling species. Evolution 52:1104-1110.
26. OLVIDO, A. E., AND T. A. MOUSSEAU. 1995. Effect of rearing environment on calling-song plasticity in the striped ground cricket. Evolution 49:1271-1277.
27. OTTE, D. 1977. Communication in Orthoptera. Pp. 334-361 in T. A. Sebeok, ed. How animals communicate. Indiana Univ. Press, Bloomington.
28. RISKA, B., T. PROUT, AND M. TURELLI.. 1989. laboratory estimates of heritabilities and genetic correlations in nature. Genetics 123: 865-871.
29. ROFF, D. A. 1997 Evolutionary quantitative genetics. Chapman and Hall, New York.
30. ROFF, D. A., AND R. PREZIOSI. 1994. The estimation of the genetic correlation: the use of the jackknife. Heredity 73:544-548.
31. SIMONS, A. M., AND D. A. ROFF. 1994. The effect of environmental variability on the heritabilities of traits of a field cricket. Evolution 48:1637-1649.
32. TUCKERMAN, J. F., D. T. GWYNNE, AND G. K. MORRIS. 1993. Reliable acoustic cues for female mate preference in a katydid (Scudderia curvicauda, Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Behav. Ecol. 4:106-613.
33. TURELLI, M. 1988. Phenotypic evolution, constant covariance, and the maintenance of additive variance. Evolution 42:1342-1347.
34. WALKER, T. J. 1957. Specificity in the response of the female tree crickets (Orthoptera, Gryllidae, Oecanthinae) to calling songs of the males. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 50:626-636.
35. _. 1974. Character displacement and acoustic insects. Am. Zoo. 14:1137-1150.
36. WEBB, K. L., AND D. A. ROFF. 1992. The quantitative genetics of sound production in Gryllus firmus. Anim. Behav. 44:823-832.
37. WEIDEMANN, S., AND A. KEUPER. 1987. Influence of vibratory signals on the phonotaxis of the gryllid Gryllus bimaculatus DeGeer (Ensifera: Gryllidae). Oecologia 74:316-318.