Erratum: Linkage analysis of smoking initiation and quantity in Dutch sibling pairs (The Pharmacogenomics Journal (2004) vol. 4 (274-282) 10.1038/sj.tpj.6500255);Linkage analysis of smoking initiation and quantity in Dutch sibling pairs

Pharmacogenomics Journal

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 274-282

  Vink, J M ^a   Beem, A L ^a   Posthuma, D ^a   Neale, M C ^b   Willemsen, G ^a   Kendler, K S ^b   Slagboom, P E ^c   Boomsma, D I ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Heritability; Linkage; QTL; Sib pairs; Smoking

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME 10; CHROMOSOME 14; CHROMOSOME 3; CHROMOSOME 6; CIGARETTE SMOKING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DIZYGOTIC TWINS; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FAMILY STUDY; FEMALE; HERITABILITY; HUMAN; LINKAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SIBLING; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 4344609658     PISSN: 1470269X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.tpj.6500270     Document Type: Erratum

References (43)

1. Heath AC, Madden PAF. Genetic influences on smoking behavior. Behavior Genetic Approaches in Behavioral Medicine. Plenum Press: New York 1995; pp 45-66.
2. Hopfer CJ, Crowley TJ, Hewitt JK. Review of twin and adoption studies of adolescent substance use. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2003; 42: 710-719.
3. Sullivan PF, Kendler KS. The genetic epidemiology of smoking. Nicotine Tobacco Res 1999; 1: S51-S57.
4. Li MD, Cheng R, Ma JZ, Swan GE. A meta-analysis of estimated and environmental effects on smoking behavior in male and female adult twins. Addiction 2003; 98: 23-31.
5. Mayhew KP, Flay BR, Mott JA. Stages in the development of adolescent smoking. Drug Alcohol Depend 2000; 59: S61-S81.
6. Koopmans JR, Slutske W, Heath AC, Neale MC, Boomsma DI. The genetics of smoking initiation and quantity smoked in Dutch adolescent and young adult twins. Behav Genet 1999; 29: 383-393.
7. Kendler KS, Neale MC, Sullivan P, Corey LA, Gardner CO, Prescott CA. A population-based twin study in women of smoking initiation and nicotine dependence. Psychol Med 1999; 29: 299-308.
8. Vink JM, Boomsma DI. Gene finding strategies. Biol Pschol 2002; 61: 53-71.
9. Walton R, Johnstone E, Munafò M, Neville M, Griffiths S. Genetic clues to the molecular basis of tobacco addiction and progress towards personalized therapy. Trends Mol Med 2001; 7: 70-76.
10. Batra V, Patkar AA, Berrettini WH, Weinstein SP, Leone FT. The genetic determinants of smoking. CHEST 2003; 123: 1730-1739.
11. Bergen AW, Korczak JF, Wieissbecker KA, Goldstein AM. A genome-wide search for loci contributing to smoking and alcoholism. Genet Epidemiol 1999; 17: S55-S60.
12. Duggirala R, Almasy L, Blangero J. Smoking behavior is under the influence of a major quantitative trait locus on human chromosome 5q. Genet Epidemiol 1999; 17: S139-S144.
13. Bierut LJ, Rice JP, Goate A, Hinrichs AL, Saccone NL, Foroud T et al. A genomic scan for habitual smoking in families of alcholics: common and specific genetic factors in substance dependence. Am J Med Genet 2004; 124: 19-27.
14. Straub RE, Sullivan PF, Ma Y, Myakishev MV, Harris-Kerr C, Wormley B et al. Susceptibility genes for nicotine dependence: a genome scan and followup in an independent sample suggest that regions on chromosomes 2, 4, 10, 16, 17 and 18 merit further study. Mol Psychiatry 1999; 4: 129-144.
15. Fagerstrom KO. Measuring the degree of physical dependence to tobacco smoking with reference to individualization of treatment. Addicit Behav 1978; 3: 235-241.
16. Boomsma DI, Vink JM, Beijsterveldt CEMv, Geus de EJC, Beem AL, Mulder EJCM et al. Netherlands Twin Register: a focus on longitudinal research. Twin Res 2002; 5: 401-406.
17. Heath AC, Martin NC. Genetic models for the natural history of smoking: evidence for a genetic influence on smoking persistence. Addict Behav 1993; 18: 19-34.
18. Heath AC, Martin N, Lynskey MT, Todorov AA, Madden PAF. Estimating two-stage models for genetic influences on alcohol, tobacco or drug use initiation and dependence vulnerability in twin and family data. Twin Res 2002; 5: 113-124.
19. Madden PAF, Pedersen NL, Kaprio J, Koskenvuo MJ, Martin NG. The epidemiology and genetics of smoking initiation and persistence: crosscultural comparisons of twin study results. Twin Res 2004; 7: 82-97.
20. Barbeau EM, Krieger N, Soobader MJ. Working class matters: socio-economic disadvantage, race/ethnicity, gender, and smoking in NHIS 2000. Am J Public Health 2004; 94: 269-278.
21. Koopmans JR, Slutske WS, van Baal GC, Boomsma DI. The influence of religion on alcohol use initiation: evidence for genotype X environment interaction. Behav Genet 1999; 29: 445-453.
22. Eaves LJ, Eysenck HJ, Martin NG. Genes, Culture and Personality. Academic Press: London 1989.
23. Boomsma DI, Koopmans JR, Doornen vLJP, Orleke JF. Genetic and social influences on starting to smoke: a study of Dutch adolescent twins and their parents. Addiction 1994; 89: 219-226.
24. Willemsen G, Vink JM, Boomsma DI. Assortative mating may explain spouses' risk of same disease. Br Med J 2003; 326: 396.
25. Merikangas K, Risch N. Genomic priorities and public health. Science 2003; 302: 599-601.
26. Vink JM, Willemsen G, Beem AL, Boomsma DI. The fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence in a Dutch sample of daily smokers, ex-smokers. Addict Behav, in press.
27. Stallings MC, Corley RP, Hewitt JK, Krauter KS, Lessem JM, Mikulich SK et al. A genome-wide search for quantititative trait loci influencing substance dependence in vulnerability in adolescence. Drug Alcohol Depend 2003; 70: 295-307.
28. Roberts SB, MacLean CJ, Neale MC, Eaves LJ, Kendler KS. Replication of linkage studies of complex traits: an examination of variation in location estimates. Am J Hum Genet 1999; 65: 876-884.
29. Uhl GR, Liu QR, Naiman D. Substance abuse vulnerability loci: converging genome scanning data. Trends Genet 2002; 18: 420-425.
30. Boomsma DI, Beem AL, Berg van den M, Dolan CV, Koopmans JR, Vink JM et al. Netherlands twin family study of anxious depression (NETSAD). Twin Res. 2000; 3: 323-334.
31. Meulenbelt I, Droog S, Trommelen GJM, Boomsma DI, Slagboom PJ. High yield noninvasive human genomic DNA isolation method for genetic studies in geographically dispersed families and populations. Am J Hum Genet 1995; 57: 1252-1254.
32. Yuan B, Vaske D, Weber JL, Beck J, Sheffield VC. Improved set of short-tandem-repeat polymorphisms for screening the human genome. Am J Hum Genet 1997; 60: 459-460.
33. Schäffer AA. Faster linkage analysis computations for pedigrees with loops or unused alleles. Hum Hered 1996; 46: 226-235.
34. Abecasis GR, Cherny SS, Cookson WO, Cardon LR. GRR: graphical representation of relationship errors. Bioinformatics 2001; 17: 742-743.
35. Abecasis GR, Cherny SS, Cookson OC, Cardon L. Merlin-rapid analyses of dense genetic maps using sparse gene flow trees. Nat Genet 2002; 30: 97-101.
36. Broman KW, Murray JC, Sheffield VC, White RL, Weber JL. Comprehensive human genetic map: individual and sex-specific variantion in recombination. Am J Hum Genet 1998; 63: 891-899.
37. Kong A, Gudbjartsson DF, Sainz J, Jonsdottir GM, Gudjonsson SA, Richardson B et al. A high-resolution recombination map of the human genome. Nat Genet 2002; 31: 241-247.
38. Neale MC, Boker SM, Xie G, Maes HH. Mx: Statistical Modeling, Richmond, VA 23298, VCU Box 900126 1999.
39. Neale MC. QTL mapping with sib-pairs: the flexibility of Mx. In: Spector TD, Snieder H, MacGregor AJ (eds). Advances in Twin and Sib-Pair Analysis. Greenwich Medical Media Ltd: London 2000; pp 219-243.
40. Amos CI. Robust variance-components approach for assessing genetic linkage in pedigrees. Am J Hum Genet 1994; 54: 535-543.
41. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC. Treshold Characters (Chapter 18). In Quantitative Genetics, editors Falconer DS, Mackay TFC. Longman Group Ltd: Essex 1996.
42. Fulker DW, Cherny SS. An improved multipoint sib-pair analysis of quantitative traits. Behav Genet 1996; 26: 527-531.
43. Sham P. Statistics in Human Genetics. Oxford University Press: New York 1998.