A document analysis method for characterizing design team performance

Journal of Mechanical Design

Volumn 126, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 378-385

  Dong, Andy ^a   Hill, Andrew W ^b   Agogino, Alice M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b XEROX CORPORATION   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; ELECTRONIC MAIL; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; SEMANTICS; TEXT PROCESSING;

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION; DOCUMENT ANALYSIS METHOD; ENGINEERING DESIGN; ENGINEERING DESIGN TEAMS; LATENT SEMANTIC ANALYSIS; TEXT ANALYSIS METHOD;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 4344591724     PISSN: 10500472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1115/1.1711818     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Cooper, R. G., and Kleinschmidt, E. J., 1995, "Benchmarking the Firm's Critical Success Factors In New Product Development," Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(5), November, pp. 374-391.
2. Griffin, A., 1996, "PDMA Research on New Product Development Practices: Updating Trends and Benchmarking Best Practices," The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(6), pp. 429-458.
3. Katzenbach, J. R., and Smith, D. K., 1993, The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
4. McDonough, III, E. F., Kahn, K. B., and Barczak, G., 2000, "An Investigation Of The Use Of Global, Virtual, And Collocated New Product Development Teams," The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(2), pp. 110-120.
5. Neck, C. P., Connerley, M. L., and Manz, C. C., 1997, "Toward A Contissnuum Of Self-Managing Team Development," Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams, Vol. 4, M. M. Beyerlein and D. A. Johnson, eds., JAI Press, Inc., Stamford, CT, pp. 193-216.
6. Henke, J. W., Krachenberg, A. R., and Lyons, T. F., 1993, "Cross-Functional Teams; Good Concept, Poor Implementation," The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10(3), pp. 216-229.
7. McComb, S. A., Green, S. G., and Compton, W. D., 1999, "Project Goals, Team Performance, and Shared Understanding," Engineering Management Journal, 11(3), September, pp. 7-12.
8. Mohammed, S., 1997, "Toward An Understanding of the Antecedents and Consequences of Shared Frames in a Group Decision-Making Context," Ph.D. Dissertation, The Ohio State University.
9. Dougherty, D., 1990, "Understanding New Markets for New Products," Strategic Manage. J., 11, pp. 59-78.
10. Fiore, S. M., Salas, E., and Cannon-Bowers, J. A., 2001, "Group Dynamics And Shared Mental Model Development," How People Evaluate Others in Organizations, M. London, ed., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 309-336.
11. Rouse, W. B., and Morris, N. M., 1986, "On Looking into the BlackBox: Prospects and Limits in the Search for Mental Models," Psychol. Bull., 100(3), pp. 349-363.
12. Bennett, A., 1978, "Understanding Conversation: The View Through a Phenomenological Window," Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley.
13. Hill, A., Song, S., Dong, A., and Agogino, A. M., 2001, "Identifying Shared Understanding in Design Using Document Analysis," Proceedings of the 2001 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, September 9-12, Pittsburgh, PA, DETC2001/DTM-21713.
14. Hill, A., Dong, A., and Agogino, A. M., 2002, "Towards Computational Tools for Supporting the Reflective Team," J. Gero, ed, Artificial Intelligence in Design '02, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 305-325.
15. Mabogunje, A., and Leifer, L. J., 1997, "Noun Phrases as Surrogates for Measuring Early Phases of the Mechanical Design Process," Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, ASME, Sacramento, California.
16. Reilly, R. R., Lynn, G. S., and Aronson, Z. H., 2002, "The Role of Personality In New Product Development Team Performance," J. Engi. Technol. Manage., 19(1), pp. 39-58.
17. Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., and Mount, M. K., 1998, "Relating Member Ability and Personality to Work-Team Processes And Team Effectiveness," J. Appl. Psychol., 83(3), June, pp. 377-391.
18. Wilde, D., 2000, "Design Team Formation Using Jungian Typology," Proceedings National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance, Retrieved from: http://www.nciia.org/documents/00pdfs/ Design%20Team%20Formation.pdf, September 11, 2002.
19. Lent, R. W., Schmidt, L., Schmidt, J., and Pertmer, G., 2002, "Exploration of Collective Efficacy Beliefs in Student Project Teams: Implications for Student and Team Outcomes," Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Retrieved from http:// www.asee.org/conferences/caps/document2/2002-328-Paper.pdf, September 11, 2002.
20. Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., and Laham, D., 1998, "Introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis," Discourse Process., 25, pp. 259-284.
21. Salton, G., and McGill, M. J., 1983, Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval, McGraw-Hill, New York.
22. Deerwester, S., Dumais, S. T., Furnas, G. W., and Landauer, T. K., 1990, "Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis," J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 41(6), pp. 391-407.
23. Foltz, P. W., Kintsch, W., and Landauer, T. K., 1998, "The Measurement of Textual Coherence with Latent Semantic Analysis," Discourse Process., 25(2&3), pp. 285-307.
24. Landauer, T. K., Laham, D., and Foltz, P. W., 2000, "The Intelligent Essay Assessor," IEEE Intelligent Systems & Their Applications, 15(5), pp. 27-31.
25. Landuaer, T. K., 1999, "Latent Semantic Analysis: A Theory of the Psychology of Language and Mind," Discourse Process., 27(3), pp. 303-310.
26. Brown, S. L., and Eisenhardt, K. M., 1995, "Product Development: Past Research, Present Findings and Future Directions," Acad. Manage Rev., April, 20(2), pp. 343-378.
27. Dhillon, I. S., and Modha, D. S., 2001, "Concept Decompositions for Large Sparse Text Data Using Clustering," Mach. Learn., 42(1-2), pp. 143-175.
28. Walpole, R. E., Myers, R. H., Myers, S. L., and Ye, K., 2002, Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists, Seventh Edition, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
29. Dougherty, D., 1992, "Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms," Organization Science, 3, pp. 179-202.
30. Yang, M. C., 2003, "Concept Generation and Sketching: Correlations with Design Outcome," Proceedings of 2003 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Chicago, IL, USA, September 2-6.
31. Janis, I. L., 1983, Groupthink: Psychological Studies Of Policy Decisions And Fiascoes, Second Edition, Houghton-Mifflin, Boston.
32. Neck, C. P., and Manz, C. P., 1994, "From Groupthink to Teamthink: Toward the Creation of Constructive Thought Patterns in Self-Managing Teams," Hum. Relat., 47(8), pp. 929-952.
33. Mullen, B., and Cooper, C., 1994, "The Relation Between Group Cohesiveness and Performance: An Integration," Psychol. Bull., 115(2), pp. 210-227.
34. Stumpf, S. C., and McDonnell, J. T., 2001, "Talking About Team Framing: Using Argumentation to Analyze and Support Experiential Learning in Early Design Episodes," Des. Stud., 23, pp. 5-23.
35. Shuang, S., Dong, A., and Agogino, A. M., 2003, "Time Variance of Design 'Story Telling' in Engineering Design Teams," Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED), CD ROM, ISBN: 1-904670-00-8, The Design Society.