Patterns of gene expression in rat bone marrow stromal cells cultured on titanium alloy discs of different roughness

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 70, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 391-401

  Leven, Robert M ^a   Virdi, Amarjit S ^a   Sumner, Dale R ^a  

^a RUSH MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Gene expression; Stromal cells; Surface roughness

Indexed keywords

BONE; CARTILAGE; CELL CULTURE; PROTEINS; RAT CONTROL; RNA;

BONE MARROW; CARTILAGE LINEAGE; FIBROBLASTIC MORPHOLOGY;

GENES;

BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN; HOX 1.4 PROTEIN; HOX PROTEIN; PHOSPHOLIPASE; PROTEIN KINASE; SCLEROPROTEIN; TITANIUM; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE MARROW; CARTILAGE; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; DOWN REGULATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; MALE; MESENCHYME CELL; NONHUMAN; RAT; RNA EXTRACTION; SURFACE PROPERTY;

EID: 4344559254     PISSN: 00219304     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30082     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Li J, Liao H, Fartash B, Hermansson L, Johnsson T. Surface-dimpled commercially pure titanium implant and bone ingrowth. Biomaterials 1997;18:691-696.
2. Wong M, Eulenberger J, Schenk R, Hunziker E. Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:1567-1575.
3. Ogawa T, Ozawa S, Shih JH, Ryu KH, Sukotjo C, Yang JM, Nishimura I. Biomechanical evaluation of osseous implants having different surface topographies in rats. J Dent Res 2000;79:1857-1863.
4. Hayakawa T, Yoshinari M, Nemoto K, Wolke JG, Jansen JA. Effect of surface roughness and calcium phosphate coating on the implant/bone response. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:296-304.
5. Baker D, London RM, O'Neal R. Rate of pull-out strength gain of dual-etched titanium implants: a comparative study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:722-728.
6. Trisi P, Rao W, Rebaudi A. A histometric comparison of Ra (0.14) and Ra (5.8) titanium implants in human low-density jawbone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:689-698.
7. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-902.
8. Bowers KT, Keller JC, Randolph BA, Wick DG, Michaels CM. Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:302-310.
9. Qu J, Chehroudi B, Brunette DM. The use of micromachined surfaces to investigate the cell behavioural factors essential to osseointegration. Oral Dis 1996;2:102-115.
10. Korovessis PG, Deligianni DD. Role of surface Ra (5.8)ness of titanium versus hydroxyapatite on human bone marrow cells response. J Spinal Disord Tech 2002;15:175-183.
11. Itala A, Ylanen HO, Yrjans J, Heino T, Hentunen T, Hupa M, Aro HT. Characterization of microRa (5.8) bioactive glass surface: surface reactions and osteoblast responses in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;62:404-411.
12. Dalby MJ, Kayser MV, Bonfield W, Di Silvio L. Initial attachment of osteoblasts to an optimised HAPEX topography. Biomaterials 2002;23:681-690.
13. Mustafa K, Wroblewski J, Hultenby K, Lopez BS, Arvidson K. Effects of titanium surfaces blasted with TiO2 particles on the initial attachment of cells derived from human mandibular bone. A scanning electron microscopic and histomorphometric analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:116-128.
14. Lumbikanonda N, Sammons R. Bone cell attachment to dental implants of different surface characteristics. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:627-636.
15. Kononen M, Hormia M, Kivilahti J, Hautaniemi J, Thesleff I. Effect of surface processing on the attachment, orientation, and proliferation of human gingival fibroblasts on titanium. J Biomed Mater Res 1992;26:1325-1341.
16. Richards RG. The effect of surface Ra (5.8)ness on fibroblast adhesion in vitro. Injury 1996;27 Suppl 3:SC38-SC43.
17. Lauer G, Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad M, Otten JE, Hubner U, Schmelzeisen R, Schilli W. The titanium surface texture effects adherence and growth of human gingival keratinocytes and human maxillar osteoblast-like cells in vitro. Biomaterials 2001;22:2799-2809.
18. van den DJ, de Ruijter AJ, Spauwen PH, Jansen JA. Observations on the effect of BMP-2 on rat bone marrow cells cultured on titanium substrates of different Ra (5.8)ness. Biomaterials 2003;24:1853-1860.
19. Mustafa K, Wennerberg A, Wroblewski J, Hultenby K, Lopez BS, Arvidson K. Determining optimal surface Ra (5.8)ness of TiO(2) blasted titanium implant material for attachment, proliferation and differentiation of cells derived from human mandibular alveolar bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:515-525.
20. Lohmann CH, Sagun R Jr, Sylvia VL, Cochran DL, Dean DD, Boyan BD, Schwartz Z. Surface Ra (5.8)ness modulates the response of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3) thRa (5.8) regulation of phospholipase A(2) activity and activation of protein kinase A. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;47:139-151.
21. Castellani R, de Ruijter A, Renggli H, Jansen J. Response of rat bone marrow cells to differently Ra (5.8)ened titanium discs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:369-378.
22. ter Brugge PJ, Wolke JG, Jansen JA. Effect of calcium phosphate coating crystallinity and implant surface Ra (5.8)ness on differentiation of rat bone marrow cells. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;60:70-78.
23. ter Brugge PJ, Torensma R, De Ruijter JE, Figdor CG, Jansen JA. Modulation of integrin expression on rat bone marrow cells by substrates with different surface characteristics. Tissue Eng 2002;8:615-626.
24. Kieswetter K, Schwartz Z, Hummert T, Cochran DL, Simpson J, Dean DD, Boyan BD. Surface Ra (5.8)ness modulates the local production of growth factors and cytokines by osteoblast-like MG-63 cells. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;32:55-63.
25. Boyan BD, Sylvia VL, Liu Y, Sagun R Jr, Cochran DL, Lohmann CH, Dean DD, Schwartz Z. Surface Ra (5.8)ness mediates its effects on osteoblasts via protein kinase A and phospholipase A2. Biomaterials 1999;20:2305-2310.
26. Sisk M, Lohmann CH, Cochran DL, Sylvia VL, Simpson JP, Dean DD, Boyan BD, Schwartz Z. Inhibition of cyclooxygenase by indomethacin modulates osteoblast response to titanium surface Ra (5.8)ness in a time-dependent manner. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:52-61.
27. Batzer R, Liu Y, Cochran DL, Szmuckler-Moncler S, Dean DD, Boyan BD, Schwartz Z. Prostaglandins mediate the effects of titanium surface Ra (5.8)ness on MG63 osteoblast-like cells and alter cell responsiveness to 1 alpha,25-(OH)2D3. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;41:489-496.
28. Nilas L, Hassager C, Christiansen C. Long-term precision of dual photon absorptiometry in the lumbar spine in clinical settings. Bone Miner 1988;3:305-315.
29. Boyan BD, Lincks J, Lohmann CH, Sylvia VL, Cochran DL, Blanchard CR, Dean DD, Schwartz Z. Effect of surface Ra (5.8)ness and composition on costochondral chondrocytes is dependent on cell maturation state. J Orthop Res 1999;17:446-457.
30. Schwartz Z, Lohmann CH, Oefinger J, Bonewald L, Dean DD, Boyan BD. Implant surface characteristics modulate differentiation behavior of cells in the osteoblastic lineage. Adv Dent Res 1999;13:38-48.
31. Ahmad M, Gawronski D, Blum J, Goldberg J, Gronowicz G. Differential response of human osteoblast-like cells to commercially pure (cp) titanium grades 1 and 4. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;46:121-131.
32. Shah AK, Sinha RK, Hickok NJ, Tuan RS. High-resolution morphometric analysis of human osteoblastic cell adhesion on clinically relevant orthopedic alloys. Bone 1999;24:499-506.
33. Eisenbarth E, Linez P, Biehl V, Velten D, Breme J, Hildebrand H. Cell orientation and cytoskeleton organisation on ground titanium surfaces. Biomol Eng 2002;19:233.
34. Balint E, Lapointe D, Drissi H, Van Der MC, Young DW, Van Wijnen AJ, Stein JL, Stein GS, Lian JB. Phenotype discovery by gene expression profiling: mapping of biological processes linked to BMP-2-mediated osteoblast differentiation. J Cell Biochem 2003;89:401-426.
35. Piolleti DP, Leoni L, Genini D, Takei H, Du P, Corbeil J. Gene expression analysis of osteoblastic cels contacted by orthopedic implant particles. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;61:408-420.
36. Raouf A, Seth A. Discovery of osteoblast-associated genes using cDNA microarrays. Bone 2002;30:463-471.
37. Abron A, Hopfensperger M, Thompson J, Cooper LF. Evaluation of a predictive model for implant surface topography effects on early osseointegration in the rat tibia model. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:40-46.
38. Cooper LF. A role for surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:522-534.
39. Hansson S, Norton M. The relation between surface Ra (5.8)ness and interfacial shear strength for bone-anchored implants. A mathematical model. J Biomech 1999;32:829-836.
40. Luo G, Sadegh AM, Alexander H, Jaffe W, Scott D, Cowin SC. The effect of surface Ra (5.8)ness on the stress adaptation of trabecular architecture around a cylindrical implant. J Biomech 1999;32:275-284.
41. Grossner-Schreiber B, Tuan RS. [The influence of the titanium implant surface on the process of osseointegration]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1991;46:691-693.