The effect of surface roughness on the stress adaptation of trabecular architecture around a cylindrical implant

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 275-284

  Luo, Gangming ^a   Sadegh, Ali M ^a   Alexander, Harold ^b   Jaffe, William ^b   Scott, David ^b   Cowin, Stephen C ^a  

^a City University of New York   (United States)

^b NYU HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone implant interface; Surface roughness; Trabecular architecture

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); INTERFACES (MATERIALS); STRESS ANALYSIS; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

BONE-IMPLANT INTERFACES; TRABECULAR BONE;

BIOMECHANICS;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE REMODELING; BONE STRESS; BONE STRUCTURE; GEOMETRY; IMPLANT; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TRABECULAR BONE; X RAY;

HUMANS; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STRUCTURAL; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 0033104477     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00172-9     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Albrektsson P.I., Branemark H.A., Hansson, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Acta Orthopedica Scandinavica. 52:1981;155-170.
2. Brebbia C.A., Telles J.C.F., Wrobel L.C. Boundary Element Techniques. 1984;Springer, Berlin.
3. Bobyn J.D., Pillar R.M., Binnington A.G., Szivek J.A. The effect of proximally and fully porous-coated canine hip stem design on bone modeling. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 5:1987;393-408.
4. D'Antonio, J.A., Capello, W.N., Crothers, O.D., Jaffe, W.L., Manley, M.T., 1992. Early clinical experience with hydroxyapatite-coated femoral implants. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 74-A, 995-1008.
5. Engh, C.A., Bobyn, J.D., 1985. Biological Fixation in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Thorofare, NJ, Slack.
6. Gross U., Müller-Mai C., Fritz T., Voigt C., Knarse W., Schmitz H.J. Implant surface roughness and mode of load transmission influence peri implant bone structure Clinical Implant Materials. Advances in Biomaterials. 9:1990;303-308.
7. Lanyon, L.E., 1984. Functional strain as a determinant for bone remodeling Calcified Tissue International 36, S56-S61.
8. Luo G.M. A new boundary element method coupled with FEM packages. Communications in Applied Numerical Methods. 5:1989;365-371.
9. Luo G.M., Cowin S.C., Sadegh A.M., Arramon Y.P. Implementation of strain rate as a bone remodeling stimulus. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 117:1995;329-338.
10. Luo G.M., Cowin S.C., Sadegh A.M., Arramon Y. Strain rate and strain as bone remodeling stimuli. Odgaard A., Weinans H. Bone Structure and Remodeling. 1995;189-199 World Scientific, Singapore.
11. Rubin C.T., Lanyon L.E. Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 66A:1984;39-310.
12. Rubin C.T., Lanyon L.E. Osteoregulatory nature of mechanical stimuli. function as a determinant for adaptive bone remodeling Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 5:1987;300-307.
13. Sadegh A.M., Luo G.M., Cowin S.C. Bone Ingrowth; an application of the boundary element method to bone remodeling at the implant interface. Journal of Biomechanics. 28:1993;167-182.
14. Spivak J.M., Ricci J.L., Blumenthal N.C., Alexander H. A new canine model to evaluate the biological response of intramedullary bone to implant material and surfaces. Journal of Biomedical Material Research. 24:1990;1121-1149.