Distinctive collexeme analysis and diachrony

Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 243-256

  Hilpert, Martin ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 43249159410     PISSN: 16137027     EISSN: 16137035     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/CLLT.2006.012     Document Type: Note

References (24)

1. Allan, Robin, Philip Holmes, and Tom Lundskaer-Nielsen 2000 Danish. A comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.
2. Berglund, Ylva 1997. Future in Present-Day English: Corpus-Based Evidence on the Rivalry of Expressions. ICAME Journal 21, 7-19.
3. Bergs, Alexander and Gabriele Diewald (eds.) to appear Constructions and Language Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Binnick, Robert I.
4. 1971 Will and Be Going To. Chicago Linguistic Society 7, 40-51.
5. Close, Reginald A. 1977 Some Observations on the Meaning and Function of Verb Phrases Having Future Time Reference. In W. D. Bald and R. Ilson (eds.), Studies in English Usage: The Resources of a Present-Day English Corpus for Linguistic Analysis. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 125-56.
6. De Smet, Hendrik. 2005 A corpus of Late Modern English Texts. ICAME Journal 29, 69-82.
7. Gries, Stefan Th. 2004 Coll.analysis 3. A program for R for Windows 2.x.
8. Gries, Stefan Th. and Anatol Stefanowitsch. 2004 Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspectives on 'alternations'. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9/1, 97-129.
9. to appear Cluster analysis and the identification of collexeme classes. In J. Newman and S. Rice (eds.), Empirical and Experimental Methods in Cognitive/Functional Research. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
10. Gilquin, Gaëtanelle to appear The verb slot in causative constructions. Finding the best fit. Constructions.
11. Haegeman, Liliane M.V. 1989 Be going to and will: A Pragmatic Account. Journal of Linguistics 25, 291-317.
12. Heine, Bernd and Tania Kuteva 2002 World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Kemmer, Suzanne and Martin Hilpert 2005 Constructional grammaticalization in the make-causative. Paper presented at the 17th ICHL, Madison, WI.
14. Kroch, Anthony, Beatrice Santorini, and Lauren Delfs 2004 The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English. URL
15. Leech, Geoffrey N. 1992 100 million words of English: the British National Corpus. Language Research 28/1, 1-13.
16. Lemmens, Maarten 2005 Aspectual posture verb constructions in Dutch. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 17/3, 183-217.
17. Noël, Dirk 2006 Diachronic construction grammar vs. grammaticalization theory. Leuven: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. Preprint Nr. 255.
18. Stefanowitsch, Anatol 2001 Constructing causation: A construction-grammar approach toanalytic causatixes. Doctoral dissertation, Rice University
19. Stefanowitsch, Anatol and Stefan Th. Gries 2003 Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8/2, 209-43.
20. Traugott, Elizabeth 1989 On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 57/1, 33-65.
21. 2003 Constructions in grammaticalization. In Brian Joseph and Richard Janda (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 624-47.
22. 2005 On the relation between constructions and grammaticalization. Paper presented at the 17th ICHL, Madison WI.
23. Visser, Frederikus Th. 1963 An historical syntax of the English grammar. Leiden: Brill.
24. Wekker, Hans Christian 1976 The Expression of Future Time in Contemporary British English. Amsterdam: North Holland.