Aspectual Posture Verb Constructions in Dutch

Journal of Germanic Linguistics

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 183-217

  Lemmens, Maarten ^a  

^a UNIV LILLE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 42649099879     PISSN: 14705427     EISSN: 14753014     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1470542705000073     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Berman Ruth A., and Dan I. Slobin (eds.).1994. Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Bertinetto Pier Marco, Karen H. Ebert, and Casper de Groot. 2000. The progressive in Europe. Dahl 2000, 517–558.
3. Boogaart Ronny. 1991. Progressive aspect in Dutch. Linguistics in the Netherlands, ed. by Frank Drijkoningen and Ans van Kemenade, 1–9. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
4. Booij Geert. 2002. Constructional idioms, morphology, and the Dutch lexicon. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 14. 301–329.
5. Brisau André. 1969. English progressive tenses and their Dutch equivalents. Studia Germanica Gandensia 11. 73–85.
6. Bybee Joan L., Revere Perkins, and William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Comrie Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Dahl Östen (ed.).2000. Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
9. Ebert Karen H. 2000. Progressive markers in Germanic languages. Dahl 2000, 605–653.
10. Haeseryn Walter, Kirsten Romijn Guido Geerts Jaap de Rooij and Maarten C. van den Toorn. 1997. Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. Tweede, geheel herziene druk. Groningen and Deurne: Martinus Nijhoffuitgevers/Wolters Plantyn.
11. Heine Bernd, Ulrike Claudi and Friederike Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Kuteva Tania. 1999. On ‘sit’/‘stand’/‘lie’ auxiliation. Linguistics 37. 191–213.
13. Lemmens Maarten. 2002. The semantic network of Dutch posture verbs. Newman 2002, 103–139.
14. Lemmens Maarten. 2005. Motion and location: Toward a cognitive typology. Parcours, détour, contour (Travaux du CIEREC, 117), ed. by Geneviève Girard, 223–242. Saint-Etienne: Publications de l'Université St. Etienne.
15. Leys Odilon. 1985. De konstruktie staan te + infinitief en verwante konstrukties. Verslagen en Mededelingen van de Koninklijke Akademie voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde 3. 265–277.
16. Lødrup Helge. 2002. Norwegian pseudocoordinations. Studia Linguistica 56. 121–143.
17. Newman John (ed.).2002. The linguistics of sitting, standing, and lying. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
18. Newman John, and Sally Rice. 2004. English sit, stand, and lie: Patterns of usage and their experiential motivations. Cognitive Linguistics 15. 351–396.
19. Song Jae Jung. 2002. The posture verbs in Korean. Newman 2002, 359–385.
20. Talmy Leonard. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics(2 vols.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Van den Hoek Theo. 1971. Leggen en zetten. Tabu 1. 33–37.
22. Van den Toorn Maarten C. 1972. Over de semantische kenmerken van staan, liggen en zitten. De Nieuwe Taalgids 6. 459–464.
23. Van Oosten Jeanne. 1986. Sitting, standing and lying in Dutch: A cognitive approach to the distribution of the verbs zitten, staan, and liggen. Dutch linguistics at Berkeley, ed. by Jeanne van Oosten and John Snapper, 137–160. Berkeley: University of California Press.
24. Van Pottelberghe Jeroen. 2002. Nederlandse progressiefconstructies met werkwoorden van lichaamshouding. Nederlandse Taalkunde 7. 142–174.
25. Vendler Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
26. Verhoeven Ludo, and Sven Strömqvist (eds).2004. Relating events in narratives: Typological and contextual perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.