Using genetic algorithm to design protein sequence

Applied Mathematics and Computation

Volumn 200, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-9

  Scott, Luis P B ^a   Chahine, Jorge ^b   Ruggiero, José R ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO ABC   (Brazil)

^b SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; Genetic algorithms; Optimization; Prediction; Protein structure

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACIDS; BIOINFORMATICS; HYDROPHOBICITY; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; OPTIMIZATION; PROTEINS; VAN DER WAALS FORCES;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCES; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

GENETIC ALGORITHMS;

EID: 43149098039     PISSN: 00963003     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2007.09.033     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Baldi P. Exploiting the past and the future in protein secondary structure prediction. Bioinformatics 15 11 (1995) 937-946
2. Barton G. Protein secondary structure prediction. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 5 (1995) 372-376
3. Amari S., Aizawa M., Zhang J., and Fukuzawa. VISCANA: Visualized cluster analysis of protein-ligand interaction based on the abinitio fragment molecular orbital method for virtual ligand screening. Journal of Chemical Information and Modelling 46 (2006) 221-230
4. Belda I., et al. ENPDA: an evolutionary structure-based de novo peptide design algorithm. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 19 (2005) 585-601
5. Bohr H., Bohr J., Brunak S., Cotterill R.M.J., Lautrup B., Nørskov L., Olsen O., and Petersen S. Protein secondary structure and homology by neural networks. FEBS Letters 241 (1998) 223-228
6. Bonneau R. Contact order and ab initio protein structure prediction. Protein Science 11 (2002) 1937-1944
7. Dill K.A. Principles of Protein folding - A perspective form simple exact models. Protein Science 4 (1995) 561-602
8. Chan S.H., and Dill K. The Protein Folding Problem. Physics Today (1993) 24-32
9. Bottegoni G., Cavalli A., and Racnatinni M. A comparative study on the application of hierarchical-agglomerative clustering approaches to organize outputs of reiterated docking runs. Journal of Chemical Information and Modelling (2006) 26
10. Bystroff C., and Baker D. Prediction of local structure in proteins using a library of sequence-structure motifs. Journal of Molecular Biology 281 (1999) 565-577
11. Cai Y., Li Y., and Chou K.C. Using neural networks for prediction of domain structure. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1476 (2000) 1-2
12. Cai Y., Li Y., and Chou K. Classification and prediction of β-turns types by neural networks. Advances in Engineering Software 30 (1999) 347-352
13. Canutescu A., et al. A graph-theory algorithm for rapid protein side-chain prediction. Protein Science 12 (2003) 2001-2004
14. Chandonia J.M., and Karplus M. New methods for accurate prediction of protein secondary structure. Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics 35 (1999) 293-306
15. Chandonia J.M., and Karplus M. The importance of larger data sets for protein secondary structure prediction with neural networks. Protein Science 5 (1996) 768-774
16. Chen H., et al. On evaluating molecular-docking methods for pose prediction and enrichment factors. Journal of Chemical Information and Modelling 46 (2006) 401-415
17. Samudrala R., Huang S.E., Koehl P., and Levitt M. Constructing side chains on near-native main chains for ab initio protein structure prediction. Protein Engineering 13 7 (2000) 453-457
18. Zhang Y., and Skolinick J. The Protein structure prediction problem could be solved using the current PDB library. PNAS 102 4 (2005) 1029-1034
19. Cui Y., et al. Protein folding simulation with genetic algorithm and supersecondary structure constraints. Proteins: Structure, Functions and Genetics 31 (1998) 247-257
20. Dandekar T., and Argos P. Folding the main chain of small proteins with the genetic algorithm. Journal of Molecular Biology 236 (1994) 844-861
21. Desjarlais J.R., and Handel T.M. Side-chain backbone flexibility in protein core design. Journal of Molecular Biology 290 I (1999) 305-318
22. Dinner R.A., et al. Use of quantitative structure-property relationships to predict the folding ability of model proteins. Proteins: Structure, Functions and Genetics 33 (1998) 177-203
23. Fetron J.S. Patterns, and amino acid frequencies in structural building, a protein secondary structure classification scheme. Proteins: Structure Function and Genetics 27 2 (1997) 249-271
24. Frishman D., and Argos P. Incorporation of non-local interactions in protein secondary structure prediction from amino acid sequence. Protein Engineering 9 2 (1996) 33-142
25. Gray J.F., et al. Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. Journal of Molecular Biology 331 (2003) 281-299
26. Jacobson M., et al. Force field validation using protein side chain prediction. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 106 44 (2002) 11673-11680
27. Kono H.e., and Doi J. Energy minimization method using automata network for sequence and side-chain conformation prediction form given backbone geometry. Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics 19 (1994) 244-255
28. Kolinsket A. A reduced model of short range interactions in polypeptides chains. Journal of Chemical Physics 103 10 (1995)
29. Leonhard K., et al. Solvent-amino acid interaction energies in three-dimensional-lattice Monte Carlo simulations of a model 27-mer protein: Folding thermodynamics and Kinetics. Protein Science May (2004) 358-369
30. Liang S., and Grishin N.V. Side-chain modeling with an optimized scoring function. Protein Science 11 (2002) 322-331
31. Moult J. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)- round 5. Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics 53 S6 (2003) 334-339
32. Fang Q., and Shortle D. New fold methods: prediction reports. Protein: Structure, Function and Genetics 53 S6 (2003) 486-490
33. Muskal M.S., and Kim H.S. Predicting protein secondary structure content a tandem neural network approach. Journal of Molecular Biology 225 (1992) 713-727
34. Noever D., et al. Artificial neural network prediction of tetragonal lysozme fae growth rates. Journal of Crystal Growth 167 (1996) 221-236
35. Pendersen T.J., and Moult J. Protein folding simulations with genetic algorithms and a detailed molecular description. Journal of Molecular Biology 269 (1997) 240-259
36. Peterson R.W. Improved side-chain prediction accuracy using an ab initio potential energy function and very large rotamer library. Protein Science 13 (2004) 735-751
37. Qian H. Prediction of α-Helices in Proteins based on Thermodynamic Parameters form Solution Chemistry. Journal of Molecular Biology 256 (1996) 663-666
38. Ponder J.W., and Richards F.M. Tertiary templates for protein use packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes. Journal of Molecular Biology 193 (1987) 775-791
39. Radja, et al. Conservation of Statistical results under the reduction of pair-contact interactions to salvation interaction. Physical Review E 72 (2005) 6
40. Sun S. A Genetic algorithm that seeks native states of peptides and proteins. Biophysical Journal 69 8 (1995) 340-355
41. Saunders C.T., and Bakers D. Evaluation of structural and evolutionary contributions to deleterious mutation prediction. Journal of Molecular Biology 322 (2002) 891-901
42. Rost B., and Sander C. Combining evolutionary information and neural networks to predict protein secondary structure. Proteins: Structure, Functions and Genetics 19 (1994) 55-72
43. B. Rost, C. Sander, Third Generation Prediction of Secondary Structure, , 2000.
44. Standley D.M., et al. Tertiary structure prediction of mixed α/β proteins via energy minimization. Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics 32 2 (1998) 240-252
45. L.P.B. Scott, J. Chahine, J.R. Ruggiero,Use of Genetic Algorithms and Solvation Potential to Study Peptides Structure, .