Repetition blindness in sentence contexts: Not just an attribution?

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 295-313

  Bond, Rachel ^a   Andrews, Sally ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMBIGUITY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTRACTIBILITY; DISTRACTOR MODEL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LEARNING TEST; MALE; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; NORMAL HUMAN; RAPID SERIAL VISUAL PRESENTATION TEST; REPETITION BLINDNESS PHENOMENON; SENTENCE CONGRUITY; TASK PERFORMANCE; TYPE TOKEN APPROACH; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL MEMORY; WORD RECOGNITION; WORD REPETITION; ADOLESCENT; ATTENTION; COMPREHENSION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; COMPREHENSION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS;

EID: 43049177688     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/MC.36.2.295     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. ABRAMS, L., DYER, J. R., & MACKAY, D. G. (1996). Repetition blindness interacts with syntactic grouping in rapidly presented sentences. Psychological Science, 7, 100-104.
2. ARMSTRONG, I. T., & MEWHORT, D. J. K. (1995). Repetition deficit in RSVP displays: Encoding failure or retrieval failure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 1044-1052.
3. BAAYEN, R. H., PIEPENBROCK, R., & GULIKERS, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (Release 2) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
4. BAVELIER, D. (1994). Repetition blindness between visually different items: The case of pictures and words. Cognition, 51, 199-236.
5. BAVELIER, D. (1999). Role and nature of object representations in perceiving and acting. In V. Coltheart (Ed.), Fleeting memories: Cognition of brief visual stimuli (pp. 151-179). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. BAVELIER, D., & JORDAN, M. I. (1992). A dynamical model of priming and repetition blindness. In C. L. Giles, S. J. Hanson, & J. D. Cowan (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 5, pp. 879-886). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
7. BAVELIER, D., & POTTER, M. C. (1992). Visual and phonological codes in repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 134-147.
8. BAVELIER, D., PRASADA, S., & SEGUI, J. (1994). Repetition blindness between words: Nature of the orthographic and phonological representations involved. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 1-19.
9. CHUN, M. M. (1997). Types and tokens in visual processing: A double dissociation between the attentional blink and repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 738-755.
10. COLTHEART, V. (1999). Phonological codes in reading comprehension, short-term memory, and memory for rapid visual sequences. In V. Coltheart (Ed.), Fleeting memories: Cognition of brief visual stimuli (pp. 181-223). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. CROWDER, R. G. (1968). Intraserial repetition effects in immediate memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 7, 446-451.
12. FAGOT, C., & PASHLER, H. (1995). Repetition blindness: Perception or memory failure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 275-292.
13. FAUL, F., ERDFELDER, E., LANG, A.-G., & BUCHNER, A. (2007). G*Pöwer 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
14. HARRIS, C. L., & MORRIS, A. L. (2001). Identity and similarity in repetition blindness: No cross-over interaction. Cognition, 81, 1-40.
15. HOCHHAUS, L., & MAROHN, K. M. (1991). Repetition blindness depends on perceptual capture and token individuation failure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 422-432.
16. JOHNSTON, J. C., HOCHHAUS, L., & RUTHRUFF, E. (2002). Repetition blindness has a perceptual locus: Evidence from online processing of targets in RSVP streams. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 477-489.
17. KAHNEMAN, D., & TREISMAN, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & D. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 29-61). New York: Academic Press.
18. KANWISHER, N. G. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117-143.
19. KANWISHER, N. G., & POTTER, M. C. (1990). Repetition blindness: Levels of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 30-47.
20. LUO, C. R., & CARAMAZZA, A. (1995). Repetition blindness under minimum memory load: Effects of spatial and temporal proximity and the encoding effectiveness of the first item. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1053-1064.
21. LUO, C. R., & CARAMAZZA, A. (1996). Temporal and spatial repetition blindness: Effect of presentation mode and repetition lag on the perception of repeated items. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 95-113.
22. MASSON, M. E. J. (2004). When words collide: Facilitation and interference in the report of repeated words from rapidly presented lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 1279-1289.
23. PARK, J., & KANWISHER, N. (1994). Determinants of repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 500-519.
24. POTTER, M. C. (1993). Very short-term conceptual memory. Memory & Cognition, 21, 156-161.
25. POTTER, M. C. (1999). Understanding sentences and scenes: The role of conceptual short-term memory. In V. Coltheart (Ed.), Fleeting memories: Cognition of brief visual stimuli (pp. 13-46). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. POTTER, M. C., & LOMBARDI, L. (1990). Regeneration in the short-term recall of sentences. Journal of Memory & Language, 29, 633-654.
27. POTTER, M. C., MORYADAS, A., ABRAMS, I., & NOEL, A. (1993). Word perception and misperception in context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 3-22.
28. POTTER, M. C., STIEFBOLD, D., & MORYADAS, A. (1998). Word selection in reading sentences: Preceding versus following contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 979-992.
29. RAYMOND, J. E., SHAPIRO, K. L., & ARNELL, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 849-860.
30. STERNBERG, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extension of Donders' methods. In W. G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and performance II (pp. 276-315). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
31. WHITTLESEA, B. W. A. (2003). On the construction of behavior and subjective experience: The production and evaluation of performance. In J. S. Bowers & C. J. Marsolek (Eds.), Rethinking implicit memory (pp. 239-260). New York: Oxford University Press.
32. WHITTLESEA, B. W. A., DORKEN, M. D., & PODROUZEK, K. W. (1995). Repeated events in rapid lists: I. Encoding and representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1670-1688.
33. WHITTLESEA, B. W. A., & HUGHES, A. D. (2005). The devil is in the detail: A constructionist account of repetition blindness. In N. Ohta, C M. MacLeod, & B. Uttl (Eds.), Dynamic cognitive processes (pp. 101-130). Tokyo: Springer.
34. WHITTLESEA, B. W. A., & MASSON, M. E. J. (2005). Repetition blindness in rapid lists: Activation and inhibition versus construction and attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 54-67.
35. WHITTLESEA, B. W. A., & PODROUZEK, K. W. (1995). Repeated events in rapid lists: II. Remembering repetitions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1689-1697.
36. WHITTLESEA, B. W. A., & WAI, K. H. (1997). Reverse "repetition blindness" and release from "repetition blindness": Constructive variations on the "repetition blindness" effect. Psychological Research, 60, 173-182.