Repetition blindness interacts with syntactic grouping in rapidly presented sentences

Psychological Science

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 100-104

  Abrams, Lise ^a   Dyer, Jennifer R ^a   MacKay, Donald G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1542786669     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00337.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Banks, W.P., Burke, D.M., Krajicek, D., & Whetstone, T. (1990). Psychology lab: Developing Macintosh courseware for introductory psychology classes. Unpublished manuscript, Pomona College, Claremont, CA.
2. Bavelier, D., & Potter, M.C. (1992). Visual and phonological codes in repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 134-147.
3. Kanwisher, N.G. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117-143.
4. Kanwisher, N.G. (1991). Repetition blindness and illusory conjunctions: Errors in binding visual types with visual tokens. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 404-421.
5. MacKay, D.G. (1969). The repeated letter effect in the misspellings of normals and dysgraphics. Perception & Psychophysics, 5, 102-106.
6. MacKay, D.G. (1987). The organization of perception and action: A theory for language and other cognitive skills. New York: Springer-Verlag.
7. MacKay, D.G., & Abrams, L. (1994, April). Chunking, repetition deficits, and the Single Attachment principle: Further evidence for age-linked deficits in forming single, theoretically-specified connections. Poster session presented at the 5th Biennial Cognitive Aging Conference, Atlanta.
8. MacKay, D.G., Abrams, L., & Miller, M.D. (1994). Repetition deficits in chunks support the multiple activation principle, hut not token individuation or the single attachment principle. Manuscript submitted for publication.
9. MacKay, D.O., & Miller, M.D. (1994, April). Aging and the Single Attachment principle: Evidence for age-linked deficits in forming single, theoretically-specified connections under time pressure. Paper presented at the 5th Biennial Cognitive Aging Conference, Atlanta.
10. MacKay, D.G., & Miller, M.D. (in press). Can cognitive aging contribute to fundamental psychological theory? Repetition deafness as a test case. Aging and Cognition.
11. MacKay, D.G., Miller, M.D., & Schuster, S.P. (1994). Repetition blindness and aging: Evidence for a binding deficit involving a single, theoretically specified connection. Psychology and Aging, 5, 52-65.
12. Miller, M.D., & MacKay, D.G. (1994). Repeated words in computer-compressed speech are difficult to encode and recall. Psychological Science, 5, 47-51.
13. Miller, M.D., & MacKay, D.G. (in press). Relations between language and memory: The case of repetition deafness. Psychological Science.
14. Park, J., & Kanwisher, N. (1994). Determinants of repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 500-519.
15. Penney, C.G. (1989). Modality effects and the structure of short term memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 398-422.
16. Wingfield, A., & Butterfield, B. (1984). Running memory for sentences and parts of sentences: Syntactic parsing as a control function in working memory. In H. Bouma & D.G. Bouhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 351-363). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Woodward, J.A., Bonett, D.G., & Brecht, M.L. (1990). Introduction to linear models and experimental design. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.