Defining the forest landowner's utility-loss compensative subsidy level for a biodiversity object

European Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 125, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 67-78

  Kurttila, Mikko ^a   Pykäläinen, Jouni ^a   Leskinen, Pekka ^a  

^a FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Heuristic optimization; Subsidy; Substitutability of management objectives; Utility function; Voluntary participation

Indexed keywords

PICEA;

EID: 43049149120     PISSN: 16124669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10342-005-0079-1     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alho JM, Kolehmainen O, Leskinen P (2001) Regression methods for pairwise comparisons data. In: Schmoldt DL, Kangas J, Mendoza GA, Pesonen M (eds) The analytic hierarchy process in natural resource and environmental decision Making. managing forest ecosystems 3. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 235-251
2. Bettinger P, Graetz D, Boston K, Sessions J, Chung W (2002) Eight heuristic planning techniques applied to three increasingly difficult wildlife planning problems. Silva Fennica 36(2):561-584
3. Carlsson M, Andersson M, Dahlin B, Sallnäs O (1998) Spatial patterns of habitat protection in areas with non-industrial private forestry-hypotheses and implications. For Ecol Manage 107:203-211
4. Doremus H (2003) A policy portfolio approach to biodiversity protection on private lands. Environ Sci Policy 6:217-232
5. Dowsland KA (1993) Simulated annealing. In: Reeves CR (ed) Modern heuristic techniques for combinatorial problems. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 20-69
6. Dyer JS (1972) Interactive goal programming. Manage Sci 19(1):62-70
7. Etelä-Suomen, Oulun läänin länsiosan ja Lapin läänin lounaisosan metsien monimuotoisuuden turvaamisen toimintaohjelma (2002) Ympäristöministeriö. Suomen ympäristö583 53 p. (In Finnish)
8. Etelä-Suomen metsien monimuotoisuusohjelman luonnonsuojelubiologiset kriteerit (2003). Ympäristöministeriö. Suomen ympäristö 634. 71 p. (In Finnish)
9. Forest Protection in Southern Finland and Ostrobotnia (2000). The Finnish Environment 437. 284 p. (In Finnish with English summary)
10. Frank G, Müller F (2003) Voluntary approaches in protection of forests in Austria. Environ Sci Policy 6:261-269
11. Fries C, Lindén G, Nillius E (1998) The stream model for ecological landscape planning in non-industrial private forestry. Scand J For Res 13:370-378
12. Hyvän metsänhoidon suositukset (2001). Metsätalouden kehittämiskeskus Tapio, Julkaisusarja 13/2001 Helsinki Finland. 95 p. (In Finnish)
13. Kangas J, Pukkala T, Pykäläinen J (1996) Vuorovaikutteinen heuristinen optimointi yksityismetsien suunnittelussa (In Finnish). Folia Forestalia 1996(3):231-244
14. Karppinen H (1998) Objectives of non-industrial private forest owners: differences and future trends in southern and northern Finland. J For Econ 4:147-173
15. Karppinen H, Hänninen H, Ripatti P (2002). Suomalainen metsänomistaja 2000. Finnish Forest Research Institute Research Notes 852. 83 p
16. Keeney RL (1982) Decision analysis: an overview. Oper Res 30(5):803-838
17. Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1993) Decisions with multiple objectives. Preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
18. Kirby KJ (2003) Woodland conservation in privately-owned cultural landscapes: the english experience. Environ Sci Policy 6:253-259
19. Knoke T, Moog M (2005) Timber harvesting versus forest reserves-producer prices for open-use areas in German beech forests (Fagus sylvatica L.). Ecol Econ 52:97-110
20. Korhonen P, Wallenius S, Moskowitz H (1990). Choice behavior in interactive multiple criteria decision making. Ann Oper Res 23:161-197
21. Kurttila M (2001) The spatial structure of forests in the optimization calculations of forest planning-a landscape ecological perspective. For Ecol Manage 142:127-140
22. Kurttila M, Pukkala T (2003) Combining holding-level economic goals with spatial landscape-level goals in the planning of multiple ownership forestry. Landsc Ecol 18(5):529-541
23. Kurttila M, Pukkala T, Loikkanen J (2002) The performance of alternative spatial objective types in forest planning calculations: a case for flying squirrel and moose. For Ecol Manage 166:245-260
24. Leskinen P (2001) Statistical methods for measuring preferences. Doctoral Thesis, University of Joensuu Finland. Publications in Social Sciences, vol 48
25. Leskinen P, Kangas J (1998) Modelling and simulation of timber prices for forest planning calculations. Scand J For Res 13:469-476
26. Leskinen P, Kangas J, Pasanen A.-M (2003) Assessing ecological values with dependent explanatory variables in multi-criteria forest ecosystem management. Ecol Model 170:1-12
27. Leskinen P, Viitanen J, Kangas A, Kangas J (2005) Alternatives to incorporate uncertainty and risk attitude in multi-criteria evaluation of forest plans (in press)
28. Lootsma FA (1993) Scale sensitivity in the multiplicative AHP and SMART. J Multi Criteria Decis Anal 2:87-110
29. Michael JA (2003) Efficient habitat protection with diverse landowners and fragmented landscapes. Environ Sci Policy 6:243-251
30. Parkhurst GM, Shogren JF, Bastian C, Kivi P, Donner J, Smith RBW (2002) Agglomeration bonus: an incentive mechanism to reunite fragmented habitat for biodiversity conservation. Ecol Econ 41:305-328
31. Pukkala T (2002a) Introduction to multi-objective forest planning. In: Pukkala T (ed) Multi-objective forest planning. managing forest ecosystems 6. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 1-20
32. Pukkala T (2002b) Measuring non-wood forest outputs in numerical forest planning. A review of Finnish research. In: Pukkala T (ed) Multi-objective forest planning, managing forest ecosystems 6. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 173-207
33. Pukkala T (2002c) Monsu metsäsuunnitteluohjelma. Ohjelmiston toiminta ja käyttö. (In Finnish)
34. Pukkala T, Kangas J (1993) A heuristic optimization method for forest planning and decision making. Scand J For Res 8:560-570
35. Pukkala T, Kangas J, Kniivilä M, Tiainen A-M (1997). Integrating forest-level and compartment-level indices of species diversity with numerical forest planning. Silva Fennica 31:417-429
36. Pykäläinen J (2000) Defining forest owner's forest-management goals by means of a thematic interview in interactive forest planning. Silva Fennica 34(1):47-59
37. Pykäläinen J, Pukkala T, Kangas J (2001) Alternative priority models for forest planning on the landscape level involving multiple ownership. For Policy Econ 2:293-306
38. Reeves CR (ed) (1993) Modern heuristic techniques for combinatiorial problems. Wiley, New York
39. Steuer RE (1986) Multiple criteria optimization. Theory, computation and application. Wiley, New York