The stream model for ecological landscape planning in non-industrial private forestry

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 13, Issue 1-4, 1998, Pages 370-378

  Fries’, Clas ^a   Lindén, Gunnar ^b   Nillius, Erik ^c  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b NONE   (Sweden)

^c NONE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Boreal forest; Nature conservation; Private forest estates; Reserves; Stream buffer zones; Sweden

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BOREAL FOREST; FOREST LANDSCAPE; NATURE CONSERVATION; SILVICULTURE;

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; FOREST; LANDSCAPE; MODEL; SWEDEN;

ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PLANNING;

FORESTRY;

EID: 0031750675     PISSN: 02827581     EISSN: 16511891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02827589809382996     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ahti, T., Hämet-Ahti, L., and Jalas, J., 1968. Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe. Ann. Bot. Fenn., 5:169–211.
2. Anon. 1968. Bäcks by Tryckeribolaget Ivar Häggström AB 291Stockholm, Sweden (In Swedish.)
3. Anon. 1984. Bäcks by del II. Norrprint 352Bureå, Sweden ISBN 91–7810–198–0. (In Swedish.)
4. Anon. 1995a. Kontrolltaxering av nyckelbiotoper. Skogsstyrelsen, Meddelanden 3–1995 68Sweden, Jönköping ISSN 0283–4413. (In Swedish with English summary.)
5. Anon. 1995b. National Atlas of Sweden. Climate, Lakes and Rivers., 176Höganäs, Sweden:Bokförlaget Bra Böcker. ONR 91–87760–32–0
6. Anon. 1997. Naturskydd och naturhänsyn i skogen. Meddelande, 1 (97):113 Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping, Sweden. ISSN 0283–4413. (In Swedish.)
7. Berg, Å., Ehnstr, B., Gustafsson, L., Hallingb, T., Jonseil, M., and Weslien, J., 1994. Threatened forest plant, animal and fungus species in Sweden—distribution and habitat preferences. Conserv. Biol., 8:718–731.
8. Bren, L. J., 1995. Aspects of geometry of riparian buffer strips and its significance to forestry operations. For. Ecol. Manage., 75:1–10.
9. Castelle, A. J., Johnson, A. W., and Conolly, C., 1994. Wetland and stream buffer size requirements—a review. J. Environ. Qual., 23:878–882.
10. Esseen, P.-A., Ehnström, B., Ericson, L., Sjöberg, K., and Hansson, L., 1997. “ Boreal forests ”. In Boreal ecosystems and landscapes:structures, processes and conservation of biodiversity, Ecol. Bull. Vol. 46, 16–47. Copenhagen
11. Franklin, J. F., 1993. Preserving biodiversity:species, ecosystems, or landscapes?. Ecol. Appl., 3:202–205.
12. Fries, C., and Lämås, T., 1996. “ Different management regimes in a Swedish boreal forest landscape:economic and ecological effects ”. In Forest Mangement Planning for Biodiversity and Timber Production, Report 3 45Umeå:Dept of For. Resource Management and Geomatics, Swed. Univ. of Agri. Sciences. ISSN 1401–0070/ISRN SLU-SRG-R-3-SE
13. Fries, C., Johansson, O., Pettersson, B., and Simonsson, P., 1997. Silvicultural models to maintain and restore natural stand structures in Swedish boreal forests. For. Ecol. Manage., 94:89–103.
14. Fries, C., Carlsson, M., Dahlin, B., Lämås, T., and Salinäs, O., 1998. A review of conceptual landscape planning models for multiobjective forestry in Sweden. Can. J. For. Res., 28:159–167.
15. Gustafsson, L., and Hansson, L., 1997. Corridors as conservation tool. In Hansson, L. (ed.). Boreal ecosystems and landscapes:structures, processes and conservation of biodiversity. Ecol. Bull. (Copenhagen), 46:182–190.
16. Hansson, L., 1992. Landscape ecology of boreal forests. Trends Ecol. Evolut., 7:299–302.
17. Helmlinger, K. R., Kumar, P., and Foufoula-Georgiou, E., 1993. On the use of digital elevation data for the Hortonian and fractal analyses of channel networks. Water Resource Res., 29:2599–2613.
18. Hobbs, R. J., 1992. The role of corridors in conservation:solution or bandwagon?. Trends Ecol. Evolut., 7:389–392.
19. Lämås, T., and Fries, C., 1995. Emergence of a biodiversity concept in Swedish forest policy. Water, Soil and Air Pollution, 82:57–56.
20. Liljelund, L.-E., Pettersson, B., and Zackrisson, O., 1992. Skogsbruk och biologisk mångfald. Svensk Bot. Tidskr, 86:227–232. (In Swedish.)
21. Mladenoff, D. J., White, M. A., Pastor, J., and Crow, T. R., 1993. Comparing spatial pattern in unaltered old-growth and disturbed forest landscapes for biodiversity design and management. Ecol. Appl., 3:293–305.
22. Naiman, R. J., ed. 1992. Watershed Management:Balancing Sustainability and Environmental Change, 542New York:Springer-Verlag. ISBN 0–387–97790–2
23. Nilsson, C., 1992. “ Conservation management of riparian communities ”. In Ecological Principles of Nature Conservation. Applied in Temperate and Boreal Environments, Edited by:Hansson, L., 352–372. London:Elsevier Applied Science. ISBN 1–85166–718–0
24. Nitare, J., and Norén, M., 1992. Woodland key-habitats of rare and endangered species will be mapped in a new project of the Swedish National Board of Forestry. Svensk Bot. Tidskr, 86:219–226. (In Swedish with English summary.)
25. Noss, R. F., 1983. A regional landscape approach to maintain diversity. BioScience, 33:700–706.
26. Ohlson, M., Söderström, L., Hörnberg, G., Zackrisson, O., and Hermansson, J., 1997. Habitat quality versus long-term continuity as determinants of biodiversity in boreal old-growth swamp forests. Biol. Conserv., 81:221–231.
27. Swedish Forestry Act. 1993. Lag om ändring i skogsvårdslagen (SFS 1979:429). SFS 1993:553 9Stockholm, Sweden (In Swedish.)
28. Törnqvist, T., 1995. Skogsrikets arvingar. En sociologisk Studie av skogsägarskapet inom privat, enskilt skogsbruk. Forskningsrapport frán SAMU nr 6 442Uppsala, Sweden ISSN 1101–1890. (In Swedish with English summary.)
29. Törnquist, K., Integrating Environmental Values into Forest Planning—Baltic and Nordic Perspectives. Proceedings of the Nordic-Baltic Research Course. June271996, Räpina, Estonia. Ecological landscape planning in Swedish forestry, Edited by:Hyttinen, P., and Nilson, A., pp. 189–196. -2 July ISBN 952–9844–27–1