Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in class V carious lesions: 5-year results

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 157-163

  Demirci, Mustafa ^a   Sancakli, Hande Ş ^a   Uysal, Ómer ^a  

^a ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Class V carious lesion; Clinical performance; Dyract; Polyacid modified resin composite; PSA Prime Adhesive

Indexed keywords

COMPOMER; DYRACT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RECURRENT DISEASE; RETREATMENT; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COLOR; COMPOMERS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MIDDLE AGED; RECURRENCE; RETREATMENT; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 43049109867     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-007-0156-6     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Abate PF, Bertacchini SM, Polack MA, Macchi RL (1997) Adhesion of a compomer to dental structures. Quintessence Int 28:509-512
2. Barkmeier WW, Hammesfahr PD, Latta MA (1999) Bond strength of composite to enamel and dentin using Prime & Bond 2.1. Oper Dent 24:51-56
3. Berg JH (1998) The continuum of restorative materials in pediatric dentistry - A review for the clinician. Pediatr Dent 20:93-100
4. Brackett WW, Gunnin TD, Gilpatrick RO, Browning WD (1998) Microleakage of Class V compomer and light-cured glass ionomer restorations. J Prosthet Dent 79:261-263
5. Braem MJA, Lambrechts P, Gladys S, Vanherle G (1995) In vitro fatigue behavior of restorative composites and glass ionomers. Dent Mater 11:137-141
6. Cardenas HL, Burgess JO (1994) Thermal expansion of glass ionomers. J Dent Res 73:220 (abst 946)
7. Cattani-Lorente MA, Dupuis V, Moya F, Payan J, Meyer JM (1999) Comparative study of the physical properties of a polyacid-modified composite resin and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Dent Mater 15:21-32
8. Christensen GJ (1997) Compomers vs. resin-reinforced glass ionomers. J Am Dent Assoc 128:479-480
9. Cortes O, Garcia-Godoy F, Boj JR (1993) Bond strength of resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements after enamel etching. Am J Dent 6:299-301
10. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment (1994) Revised American Dental Association acceptance program guidelines for dentin and enamel adhesive materials. American Dental Association, January
11. Dentsply DeTrey-DeDent (1994) Dyract product information version III GB 7/94
12. Di Lenarda R, Cadenaro M, De Stefano Dorigo E (2000) Cervical compomer restorations: The role of cavity etching in a 48-month clinical evaluation. Oper Dent 25:382-387
13. Duke ES, Lindemuth J (1991) Variability of clinical dentin substrates. Am J Dent 4:241-246
14. Duke ES, Robins JW, Synder DE (1991) Clinical evaluation of a dentinal adhesive system. Quintessence Int 22:889-895
15. Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R (2001) Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials-3-year results. Clin Oral Invest 5:31-39
16. Folwaczny M, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R (2001) Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions: 5-year results. Am J Dent 14:153-156
17. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (1997) Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and composite restorative materials. J Dent Res 76:883-894
18. Hammesfahr PD (1994) Developments in resionomer systems In: Hunt PR, (ed) Glass ionomers: The next generation. Proceeding of the 2nd International Symposium on Glass Ionomers. International Symposia in Dentistry, PC, Pennsylvania, pp 47-56
19. Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC, Wilder AD, Sluder TB, Brunson WD (1991) Examining tooth flexure effect on cervical restorations: A two-year clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc 122:41-47
20. Jedynakiewicz NM, Martin N, Fletcher JM (1995)Clinical investigation of Dyract for class V cavities at the University of Liverpool: 2-year results. Summary by Dentsply DeTrey. Literature Folder, Dentsply DeTrey
21. Lim BS, Moon HJ, Baek KW, Hahn SH (2001) Color stability of glass-ionomers and polyacid-modified resin-based composites in various environmental solutions. Am J Dent 14:241-246
22. Loguercio AD, Reis A, Barbosa AN, Roulet JR (2003) Five-year Double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent 5:323-332
23. Maneenut C, Tyas MJ (1995) Clinical evaluation of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative cements in cervical 'abrasion' lesions: one-year results. Quintessence Int 26:739-743
24. McLean JW, Nicholson JW, Wilson AD (1994) Proposed nomenclature for glass ionomer dental cements and related materials. Quintessence Int 25:587-589
25. Mitra SB, Conway WT (1994) Coefficient of thermal expansion of some methacrylate- modified glass ionomers. J Dent Res 73:219(abstract 944) 219
26. Miyazaki M, Fukuishi K, Onose H (1999) Influence of light irradiation on the volumetric change of polyacid-modified resin composites. J Dent 27:149-153
27. Morris RB (1999) Strategies in dental diagnosis and treatment planning. Martin Dunitz Ltd, London
28. Owens BM, Halter TK, Brown DM (1998) Microleakage of tooth-colored restorations with a beveled gingival margin. Quintessence Int 29:356-361
29. Prati C, Chersoni S, Cretti L, Montanari G (1998) Retention and marginal adaptation of a compomer placed in non-stress-bearing areas used with the total-etch technique: A 3-year retrospective study. Clin Oral Invest 2:168-173
30. Prati C, Chersoni S, Mongiorgi G, Pashley DH (1999) Thickness and morphology of resin-infiltrated dentin layer in young, old, and sclerotic dentin. Oper Dent 22:41-47
31. Ryge G (1980) Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 30:347-358
32. Toledano M, Osorio E, Osorio R, Garcia-Godoy F (1999) Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations. J Prosthet Dent 81:610-615
33. Tyas MJ (1998) Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer). Oper Dent 23:77-80
34. Tyas MJ (2000) Three-year clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract). Oper Dent 25:152-154
35. Van Dijken JWV (1996) 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glassionomer and a resin composite in class III restorations. Am J Dent 9:195-198
36. Van Dijken JWV (1999) Longevity of new hybrid restorative materials in class III cavities. Eur J Oral Sci 107:215-219
37. Van Dijken JWV (2000) Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions. Dent Mater 16:285-291
38. Van Dijken JWV (2003) A 6-year clinical evaluation of class I poly-acid modified resin composite/resin composite laminate restorations cured with a two-step curing technique. Dent Mater 19:423-428
39. van Dijken JWV (2005) Retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. A 6-year follow-up. J Dent 33:541-547
40. Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Celis JP, Roos JR, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (1993) Assessment by nano-identation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J Dent Res 72:1434-1442