Incumbency as a source of spillover effects in mixed electoral systems: Evidence from a regression-discontinuity design

Electoral Studies

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 213-227

  Hainmueller, Jens ^a   Kern, Holger Lutz ^b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Causal inference; Contamination; Incumbency; Mixed electoral systems; Regression discontinuity design

Indexed keywords

ELECTORAL GEOGRAPHY; ELECTORAL SYSTEM; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; VOTING BEHAVIOR;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; GERMANY;

EID: 43049101064     PISSN: 02613794     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2007.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Angrist J., and Krueger A. Handbook of Labour Economics vol. 3 (1999), Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (Chapter Empirical Strategies in Labor Economics)
2. Ansolabehere S., and Snyder J.M. Using term limits to estimate incumbency advantages when officeholders retire strategically. Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 4 (2004) 487-515
3. Ansolabehere S., Snyder J.M., and Stewart C. Old voters, new voters, and the personal vote: using redistricting to measure the incumbency advantage. American Journal of Political Science 44 1 (2000) 17-34
4. von Alemann U. Das Parteiensystem der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. third ed. (2003), Leske, Opladen
5. Bawn K. The logic of institutional preferences: German electoral law as a social choice outcome. American Journal of Political Science 37 4 (1993) 965-989
6. Bawn K. Voter responses to electoral complexity: ticket splitting, rational voters and representation in the federal republic of Germany. British Journal of Political Science 28 (1999) 487-505
7. Bawn K., and Thies M. A comparative theory of electoral incentives: representing the unorganized under PR, plurality, and mixed-member electoral systems. Journal of Theoretical Politics 15 1 (2003) 5-32
8. Butler D.M., and Butler M.J. Splitting the difference? Causal inference and theories of split-party delegations. Political Analysis 14 4 (2007) 439-455
9. Cain B.E., Ferejohn J.A., and Fiorina M.P. The constituency service basis of the personal vote for U.S. representatives and British members of parliament. American Political Science Review 78 1 (1984) 110-125
10. Caramani D. Elections in Western Europe since 1815: Electoral Results by Constituencies (2000), Macmillan, London
11. Cox G.W. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the Worlds Electoral Systems (1997), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
12. Cox G.W., and Katz J.N. Elbridge Gerry's Salamander (2002), Cambridge University Press
13. Cox K.E., and Schoppa L.J. Interaction effects in mixed-member electoral systems. Comparative Political Studies 35 9 (2002) 1027-1053
14. Duverger M. Political Parties, their Organization and Activity in the Modern State (1954), Wiley, New York
15. Duverger M. Electoral Laws and their Political Consequences (1986), Agathon, New York (Chapter Duverger's Law: Forty Years Later), pp. 69-84
16. Falter J., Gabriel O.W., and Rattinger H. Wirklich ein Volk?: Die Politischen Orientierungen von Ost- und Westdeutschen im Vergleich (2000), Leske, Opladen
17. Ferrara F., Herron E.S., and Nishikawa M. Mixed Electoral Systems: Contamination and its Consequences (2005), Palgrave Macmillan, New York
18. Gaines B.J. The impersonal vote? Constituency service and incumbency advantage in British elections, 1950-92. Legislative Studies Quarterly 23 2 (1998) 167-195
19. Gelman A., and King G. Estimating incumbency advantage without bias. American Journal of Political Science 34 4 (1990) 1142-1164
20. Gschwend T. Ticket-splitting and strategic voting under mixed electoral rules: evidence from Germany. European Journal of Political Research 46 1 (2006) 1-23
21. Gschwend T., Johnston R., and Pattie C. Split-ticket patterns in mixed-member proportional election systems: estimates and analyses of their spatial variation at the German federal election, 1998. British Journal of Political Science 33 1 (2003) 109-127
22. Hahn J., Todd P., and van der Klaauw W. Identification and estimation of treatment effects with a regression-discontinuity design. Econometrica 69 1 (2000) 201-209
23. Herron E.S., and Nishikawa M. Contamination effects and the number of parties in mixed-superposition electoral systems. Electoral Studies 20 1 (2001) 63-86
24. Herzog D., Rebensdorf H., Werner C., and Wessels B. Abgeordnete und Buerger (1990), Westdeutscher Verlag
25. Holland P.W. Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81 396 (1986) 945-960
26. Hough D., and Jeffery C. Landtagswahlen: Bundestestwahlen oder Regionalwahlen?. Zeitschrift fuer Parlamentsfragen 34 1 (2003) 79-94
27. Jacobson G.C. The marginals never vanished: incumbency and competition in elections to the U.S. house of representatives, 1952-82. American Journal of Political Science 31 1 (1987) 126-141
28. Jacobson G.C., and Dimock M.A. Checking out: the effects of bank overdrafts on the 1992 house elections. American Journal of Political Science 38 3 (1994) 601-624
29. Jeffery C., and Hough D. The electoral cycle and multi-level voting in Germany. German Politics 10 1 (2001) 73-98
30. Jesse E. Split-voting in the federal republic of Germany: an analysis of the federal elections from 1953 to 1987. Electoral Studies 8 2 (1988) 109-124
31. King G., and Gelman A. Systemic consequences of incumbency advantage in U.S. house elections. American Journal of Political Science 35 1 (1991) 110-138
32. Klingemann H.-D., and Wessels B. Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: the Best of Both Worlds? (2001), Oxford University Press (Chapter The Political Consequences of Germany's Mixed-Member System: Personalization at the Grass Roots?), pp. 279-297
33. Knack S. Does rain help the republicans? Theory and evidence on turnout and the vote. Public Choice 79 1-2 (1994) 187-209
34. Lancaster T.D. Stability and Change in German Elections: How Electorates Merge, Converge, or Collide (1998), Praeger (Chapter Candidate Characteristics and Electoral Performance: A Long-Term Analysis of the German Bundestag), pp. 281-300
35. Lancaster T., and Patterson W.D. Comparative pork barrel politics: perceptions from the West German Bundestag. Comparative Political Studies 22 4 (1990) 458-477
36. Lee D.S. Randomized experiments from non-random selection in U.S. house elections. Journal of Econometrics 142 2 (2008) 675-697
37. Levitt S.D., and Wolfram C.D. Decomposing the sources of incumbency advantage in the U.S. house. Legislative Studies Quarterly 22 1 (1997) 45-60
38. Massicotte L., and Blais A. Mixed electoral systems: a conceptual and empirical survey. Electoral Studies 18 3 (1999) 341-366
39. Matsusaka J.G., and Palda F. Voter turnout: how much can we explain?. Public Choice 98 3-4 (1999) 431-446
40. Moser R.G. Electoral systems and the number of parties in post-communist states. World Politics 51 3 (1999) 359-384
41. Moser R.G., and Scheiner E. Strategic ticket splitting and the personal vote in mixed-member electoral systems. Journal of Legislative Studies 30 2 (2005) 259-276
42. Newey W.K., and West K.D. A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55 3 (1987) 703-708
43. Newey W.K., and West K.D. Automatic lag selection in covariance matrix estimation. Review of Economic Studies 61 4 (1994) 631-653
44. Pappi F.U., and Mnich P. Electoral Change: Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Western Countries (1992), Cambridge University Press, New York (Chapter Germany), pp. 179-204
45. Patzelt W.J. Abgeordnete und Repraesentation: Amtsverstaendnis und Wahlkreisarbeit (1993), Wissenschaftsverlag Rothe, Passau
46. Porter, S.R., 1995. Political Representation in Germany: the Effects of the Candidate Selection Committees, PhD thesis, University of Rochester.
47. Rosenbaum P.R. Observational Studies. second ed. (2002), Springer-Verlag, New York
48. Rubin D.B. Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology 66 (1974) 688-701
49. Rubin D.B. Assignment to treatment group on the basis of a covariate. Journal of Educational Statistics 2 1 (1977) 1-26
50. Rubin D.B. Bayesian inference for causal effects: the role of randomization. Annals of Statistics 6 1 (1978) 34-58
51. Rubin D.B. Comment: Neyman (1923) and causal inference in experiments and observational studies. Statistical Science 5 4 (1990) 472-480
52. Shadish W.R., Cook T.D., and Campbell D.T. Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference (2002), Houghton-Mifflin, Boston
53. Shugart M.S. Electoral efficiency and the move to mixed-member systems. Electoral Studies 20 2 (2001) 173-193
54. Shugart M.S., and Wattenberg M.P. Mixed-member Electoral Systems: the Best of Both Worlds? (2001), Oxford University Press, Oxford
55. Statistisches Bundesamt (various years). Die Wahlbewerber fuer die Wahl zum Deutschen Bundestag, Stuttgart: Verlag W. Kohlhammer.
56. Stratmann T., and Baur M. Plurality rule, proportional representation, and the German Bundestag: how incentives to pork-barrel differ across electoral systems. American Journal of Political Science 46 3 (2002) 506-514
57. Thistlethwaite D., and Campbell D. Regression-discontinuity analysis: an alternative to the ex post facto experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology 51 6 (1960) 309-317
58. Zeuner B. Kandidatenaufstellung zur Bundestagswahl 1965 (1970), Martinus Nijhoff, Den Haag