The relationship between scholarly communication and science and technology studies (STS)

Journal of Scholarly Publishing

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 257-273

  Park, Ji Hong ^a  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Scholarly communication; Science and technology studies; STS

Indexed keywords

EID: 42949161609     PISSN: 11989742     EISSN: 17101166     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3138/jsp.39.3.257     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. C.L. Borgman and J. Furner, 'Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics,' Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 36 (2002): 3-72, 3-4
2. See, e.g., R. Kling, L.B. Spector, and J. Fortuna, 'The Real Stakes of Virtual Publishing: The Transformation of E-Biomed into PubMed Central,' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 55, 2 (15 January 2004): 127-48;
3. R. Kling, G. McKim, and A. King, 'A Bit More to IT: Scholarly Communication Forums as Socio-Technical Interaction Networks,' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54, 1 (1 January 2003): 47-67;
4. R. Kling and L. Covi, 'Electronic Journals and Legitimate Media in the Systems of Scholarly Communication,' The Information Society 11, 4 (1995): 261-71.
5. R. Kling, 'What Is Social Informatics and Why Does It Matter?' D-Lib Magazine 5, 1, available at http://vvww.dlib.org/dlib/januaiy99/ kling/01kling.html
6. D. Beagle, 'The Sociotechnical Networks of Scholarly Communication,' Portal: Libraries and the Academy 1, 4 (October 2001): 421-43
7. Such studies include Beagle, ibid.;
8. A.P. Bishop and S.L. Star, 'Social Informatics of Digital library Use and Infrastructure,' Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 31 (1996): 301-40 1;
9. Kling et al., 'The Real Stakes'; R. Kling, L. Spector, and G. McKim, 'Locally Controlled Scholarly Publishing via the Internet: The Guild Model,' Journal of Electronic Publishing 8, 1 (August 2002), available at http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3336451.0008.101.
10. C.L. Borgman, 'Editor's Introduction,' in C.L. Borgman, ed., Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics (Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications 1990): 10-27, 13-4;
11. C.L. Borgman, 'Digital Libraries and the Continuum of Scholarly Communication,' Journal of Documentation 56, 4 (July 2000): 412-30, 414
12. L.A. Lievrouw, 'Reconciling Structure and Process in the Study of Scholarly Communication,' in C.L. Borgman, ed., Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics (Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications 1990): 59-69.
13. The notion of the 'invisible college' originated in D. Crane, Invisible Colleges. Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1972).
14. Borgman, 'Digital Libraries'; W. Garvey and B. Griffith, 'Scientific Communication: Its Role in the Conduct of Research and Creation of Knowledge,' in B.C. Griffith, ed., Key Papers in Information Science (White Plains, NY: 'Knowledge Industry Publications 1980): 211-38; Lievrouw, 'Reconciling Structure and Process'
15. Garvey and Griffith, ibid.
16. Borgman and Furner, 'Scholarly Communication'
17. Ibid., 3-4
18. R. Kling and E. Callahan, 'Electronic Journals, the Internet, and Scholarly Communication,' Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 37 (2003): 127-77, 131
19. Kling and Covi, 'Electronic Journals'
20. R. Kling and G. McKim, 'Scholarly Communication and the Continuum of Electronic Publishing,' Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50, 10 (August 1999): 890-906
21. Kling et al., 'Real. Stakes'
22. A.P. Bishop, L.J. Neumann, S.L. Star, C. Merkel, E. Ignacio and R.J. Sandusky, 'Digital Libraries: Situating Use in Changing Information Infrastructure,' Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51, 4 R March 2000): 394-413
23. C.A. Barry, 'Critical Issues in Evaluating the Impact of IT on Information Activity in Academic Research: Developing a Qualitative Research Solution,' Library and Information Science Research 17, 2 (Spring 1995): 107-34
24. D.J. de S. Price, Little Science, Big Science ... and Beyond (New York: Columbia University Press 1986)
25. Crane, Invisible Colleges
26. H.G. Small, 'A Passage through, Science: Crossing Disciplinary Boundaries,' Library Trends 48, 1 (Summer 1999): 72-108
27. H.D. White and K.W. McCain, 'Visualizing a Discipline: An Author Co-citation Analysis of Information Science, 1972-1995,' Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49, 4 (1 April 1998): 327-55
28. E. Garfield, 'What Citations Tell Us about Canadian Research,' Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science 18,4 (1993): 14-35, available at http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/pEipers/ canadianjinfolibscil8(4)p14y1993.html
29. D.R. Swanson and N.R. Smalheiser, 'Implicit Text Linkages between Medline Records: Using Arrowsmith as an Aid to Scientific Discovery,' Library Trends 48, 1 (Summer 1999): 48-59
30. Hess, ibid.
31. Ibid., 83
32. Ibid.;
33. S. Sismondo, Actor-Network Theory. An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies (Oxford: Blackwell 2004)
34. M. Callon and J. Law, 'After the Individual in Society: Lessons on Collectivity from Science, Technology and Society,' Canadian Journal of Sociology 22, 2 (Spring 1997), 165-82
35. Sismondo, Actor-Network Theory
36. O. Hanseth, M. Aanestad, and M. Berg, 'Guest Editors' Introduction: Actor-Network Theory and Information Systems: What's So Specia?' Information Technology and People 17, 2 (2004): 116-23
37. Ibid.
38. Callon and Law, 'After the Individual'
39. Hanseth et al., 'Actor-Network Theory'
40. L. Winner, 'Upon Opening the Black Box and Finding It Empty: Social Constructivisin and the Philosophy of Technology,' Science, Technology, and Human Values 18, 3 (Summer 1993): 362-78
41. This term was originated by Harry Collins, who viewed scientific controversies as a phase during which scientists and other actors try to. make major changes in what is taken for granted. Hess, Science Studies. Collins used the phrase 'core set,' which has the same meaning as 'relevant social group.'
42. T.F. Pinch and W.E. Bijker, 'The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other,' in W. Bijker, T.P. Hughes, and T.F. Pinch, eds., The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1989): 17-50
43. Ibid.
44. Ibid.;
45. W.E. Bijker, Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1995)
46. Bijker, ibid.
47. B. Latour and S. Woolgar, Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 1986), 77-9
48. See, e.g., Bishop et al., 'Digital Libraries'; Kling and Covi, 'Electronic Journals'; Kling and McKim, 'Scholarly Communication'; Kling et al., 'A Bit More To IT'; Kling et al., 'The Real Stakes'; D.M. Levy, 'Documents and Libraries: A Sociotechnical Perspective,' in A.P. Bishop, N.A. Van House, and B.P. Buttenfield, eds., Digital Library Use (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 2003): 25-42;
49. N.A. Van House, A.P. Bishop, and B.P. Buttenfield, 'Introduction: Digital Libraries as Sociotechnical Systems,' In A.P. Bishop, N.A. Van House, and B.P. Buttenfield, eds., Digital Library Use (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press 2003): 1-21.
50. J. Lave and E. Wenger, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (New York: Cambridge University Press 1991);
51. E. Wenger, Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning, and Identity (New York: Cambridge University Press 1998)
52. Latour and Woolgar, Laboratory Life
53. Hess, Science Studies